Author Guidelines

Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language · Manuscript Preparation & Submission

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

Please read these guidelines carefully before submitting your manuscript. Authors are responsible for ensuring that the manuscript complies with the scientific, methodological, ethical, language, data, copyright, and formatting requirements of Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language.

Journal Quick Facts

3032-3304
Online ISSN
Quarterly
Mar · Jun · Sep · Dec
Double-Blind
Minimum 2 Reviewers
SINTA 3
Accreditation

Quick Submission Requirements

4,000–8,000
Manuscript Words
≤16
Title Words
4
Keywords
≥30
References

✓ Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors must confirm that their submission satisfies the journal's scientific, methodological, ethical, language, technical, and formatting requirements. Manuscripts that do not comply may be returned before external peer review.

✓ Originality
The manuscript is original, has not been previously published, and is not under consideration or simultaneously submitted to another journal. All listed authors have approved the submitted version.
✓ Manuscript Length
The full manuscript contains approximately 4,000–8,000 words. Manuscripts outside this range may be returned for technical revision before review.
✓ Abstract
The abstract is written in English, presented as a single paragraph, and follows the journal template by communicating the Introduction/Background, Novelty, Methods, Results, and Conclusion/Implications. References, figures, tables, and undefined abbreviations are not included.
✓ Official Template
The manuscript has been prepared using the official Lingua submission template. Preset margins, spacing, font, font size, and automatic line numbering have not been modified.
✓ Similarity Check
The manuscript has been checked using Turnitin or equivalent software. Lingua requires a report showing less than 20% similarity for manuscripts to proceed, with all borrowed material correctly cited and paraphrased.
✓ Rights and Permissions
Authors have obtained permission, where required, for copyrighted figures, photographs, screenshots, maps, test instruments, corpus materials, transcriptions, reproduced texts, or other third-party content included in the manuscript or supplementary files.
✓ Ethical and Transparency Statements
Applicable statements concerning author contributions, funding, conflicts of interest, AI use, ethics approval/informed consent, and data availability are complete and accurate.
✓ Online Submission
The manuscript is submitted through the official Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language online submission system using an active author account.

1. General Author Guidelines

  1. All contributors submitting to Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language must comply with these Author Guidelines and the official manuscript template.
  2. The journal welcomes original research articles, theoretical papers, conceptual works, reviews, and case studies in linguistics, language studies, and related interdisciplinary fields.
  3. Relevant areas include linguistic theory; phonology and phonotactics; morphology and syntax; semantics and pragmatics; sociolinguistics and dialectology; psycholinguistics and neurolinguistics; applied linguistics; language teaching and second-language acquisition; discourse and text analysis; translation studies; multilingualism and language contact; corpus linguistics; computational linguistics; language documentation and preservation; and language policy and planning.
  4. All manuscripts undergo initial editorial screening. Eligible submissions proceed to a double-blind peer-review process involving a minimum of two independent expert reviewers.
  5. Reviewers assess originality, methodological rigor, theoretical framework, significance to the field, clarity of presentation, ethical compliance, and contribution to linguistics and language studies. The final publication decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
  6. The manuscript must be written in English. The default language style is American English. Authors are responsible for grammar, terminology, consistency, academic readability, and accurate use of discipline-specific language.
  7. Plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, manipulated results, inappropriate authorship, invented citations, unethical reuse of texts or datasets, and other breaches of publication ethics may result in rejection, correction, retraction, or further editorial action.
  8. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, scholarly integrity, analysis, interpretation, citations, copyright permissions, and conclusions of the manuscript, including any content assisted by AI tools.
  9. Authors should ensure that participants, speakers, communities, linguistic groups, multilingual populations, and culturally sensitive language data are represented accurately, respectfully, and ethically, particularly where vulnerable groups, indigenous communities, endangered languages, or identifiable speech data are involved.
  10. Submissions outside the journal's Focus and Scope or those that materially depart from the official template may be returned or declined without external review.

2. Manuscript Format

Authors must prepare manuscripts directly using the official Lingua submission template. Preset template formatting takes precedence over manually applied formatting.

Language English; consistent American English spelling, terminology, and punctuation
Template Official journal template is mandatory
Preset Formatting Do not alter margins, spacing, font type, font size, or other preset template settings
Line Numbering Automatic line numbering on the left margin must be retained for review and revision tracking
Main Sections Introduction; Method; Result and Discussion; Conclusion
Tables & Figures Must be clear, numbered, captioned, cited in the text, and presented according to the official template
Linguistic / Language Materials Linguistic examples, glosses, phonetic/phonological notation, corpus excerpts, transcriptions, screenshots, and other language materials must be legible, consistently formatted, properly credited, and cleared for publication where required
References APA 7th edition; reference-management software is strongly recommended
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines

3. Structure of the Manuscript

The manuscript should demonstrate a clear relationship between the linguistic or language-related problem, novelty, theoretical or conceptual framework, method, data or textual evidence, findings, interpretation, conclusion, and contribution to linguistics and language scholarship.

3.1 Title

The title must be concise, informative, and accurately reflect the principal linguistic phenomenon, language context, population, method, or scholarly contribution of the manuscript.

  • Maximum length: 16 words.
  • Do not include the year of the research.
  • Avoid unnecessary terms, uncommon abbreviations, unexplained symbols, and overly broad wording.
  • Where possible, make the central linguistic, multilingual, educational, cultural, cognitive, or technological focus immediately identifiable.
  • The title should support discoverability by readers and indexing systems.

3.2 Author Names and Affiliations

  • Write each author's full name without academic or professional titles.
  • List authors in the order agreed upon by all contributors.
  • Provide complete institutional affiliation, including faculty/department where applicable, institution, city/region, and country.
  • Use superscript numbers to connect authors with affiliations when required by the template.
  • Designate one corresponding author using an asterisk (*).
  • Provide a valid and actively monitored email address and correspondence details required by the template.
  • Authors are strongly encouraged to provide ORCID iDs and maintain consistent author-name metadata.

3.3 Abstract

Required Format: English • Single paragraph • IMRAD-oriented flow • No references • No figures/tables • No undefined abbreviations

The abstract must provide a concise and self-contained summary of the manuscript and follow the structure established in the journal template.

The abstract should communicate the following elements in a coherent sequence:

1 Introduction / Background: topic, essential context, importance, problem or phenomenon, and research question.
2 Novelty: what distinguishes the study from previous linguistic or language research and why the research question remains insufficiently addressed.
3 Methods: research design, context, participants or corpus, data sources, and principal analytical method.
4 Results: the principal empirical, analytical, interpretive, or conceptual findings, with a brief discussion where appropriate.
5 Conclusion / Implications: the principal conclusion, contribution, and relevant theoretical, methodological, educational, cultural, technological, or policy implication.
Important: References, figures, tables, and undefined abbreviations must not be included in the abstract.

3.4 Keywords

Provide exactly four (4) keywords immediately after the abstract. Separate keywords using semicolons as required by the journal template.

Format: KEYWORDS: Keyword1; Keyword2; Keyword3; Keyword4
  • Select specific terms representing the main linguistic phenomenon, language, population, theoretical concept, method, corpus, or educational context examined.
  • Prefer established disciplinary terminology that supports indexing and discoverability.
  • Avoid unnecessarily broad words that add little retrieval value.

3.5 Introduction

The Introduction should establish the scholarly context of the study and clearly explain why the linguistic or language-related research is necessary.

The Introduction should normally address:

  1. the linguistic, educational, sociocultural, cognitive, technological, or practical problem and its significance;
  2. relevant theoretical, historical, empirical, sociolinguistic, cognitive, or pedagogical context;
  3. the current state of scholarship or practice and key previous studies;
  4. the unresolved theoretical, empirical, methodological, pedagogical, or contextual research gap;
  5. the novelty or distinctive contribution of the study;
  6. the research question(s), hypothesis(es), or proposition(s) where relevant; and
  7. clear research objectives.
Novelty Expectation
Novelty should be stated explicitly rather than implied. Authors should explain how the manuscript extends, challenges, refines, documents, or contributes new linguistic evidence, theoretical interpretation, methodological insight, multilingual perspective, pedagogical knowledge, or computational analysis beyond relevant previous studies.

3.6 Method

The Method section must provide sufficient transparency for readers and reviewers to understand, assess, and where appropriate reproduce or critically evaluate the research process.

Because Lingua publishes diverse linguistics and language studies scholarship, the Method section should be adapted to the design. It may include:

  • Research Design — qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, experimental, quasi-experimental, ethnographic, conversation-analytic, discourse-analytic, corpus-based, computational, psycholinguistic, sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, case study, literature review, systematic review, or another appropriate design.
  • Research Context / Site — language community, classroom, institution, speech community, digital platform, archive, corpus source, laboratory, or geographic and sociocultural context where relevant.
  • Participants, Informants, Corpus, Texts, or Language Materials — sampling or selection criteria, inclusion/exclusion criteria, language background, demographic information where relevant, corpus size, and material characteristics.
  • Data Sources — interviews, observations, elicitation tasks, speech recordings, corpora, written texts, classroom interaction, surveys, experiments, archival documents, social-media discourse, digital traces, or secondary literature.
  • Instruments and Documentation — interview protocols, observation guides, questionnaires, tests, elicitation instruments, recording equipment, transcription conventions, annotation schemes, coding frameworks, corpus tools, or analytical software.
  • Procedure — recruitment or sampling, elicitation, recording, transcription, annotation, corpus compilation, classroom observation, experimental procedure, coding, digitization, or review procedure.
  • Analytical Strategy — thematic analysis, content analysis, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, critical discourse analysis, phonetic/acoustic analysis, syntactic or semantic analysis, corpus statistics, computational modeling, inferential statistics, comparative analysis, or another justified method.
  • Validity / Trustworthiness / Reflexivity — reliability, triangulation, member checking, inter-coder procedures, researcher positionality, reflexive documentation, or other quality-assurance measures where relevant.
  • Ethics, Consent, and Data Protection — ethics approval, informed consent, permission to record or reproduce language data, anonymization, privacy protection, and community permissions where applicable.
For corpus, computational, or experimental studies: report corpus construction or dataset selection, preprocessing/annotation procedures, software or models used, relevant parameters, validation procedures, and statistical or computational criteria in enough detail to support reproducibility.

3.7 Result and Discussion

Lingua uses a combined Result and Discussion section. Authors should present evidence clearly and then interpret its meaning in relation to the research questions, linguistic theory, previous scholarship, language use, pedagogy, or the broader disciplinary context.

Organize findings according to research questions, hypotheses, linguistic levels, analytical themes, corpus categories, experimental conditions, cases, or conceptual categories.
Use appropriate evidence such as linguistic examples, quotations, transcriptions, corpus excerpts, concordance data, acoustic measurements, tables, figures, statistical results, coding results, or qualitative extracts.
Move beyond description by explaining the theoretical, linguistic, sociocultural, cognitive, pedagogical, technological, or practical significance of the findings.
Compare findings with relevant previous studies and theories, and explain agreements, differences, extensions, contradictions, or context-specific patterns.
Clarify the manuscript's theoretical, methodological, empirical, educational, sociocultural, computational, or practical contribution.
Avoid duplicating identical information in narrative text, tables, figures, linguistic examples, corpus displays, and supplementary materials.

3.8 Conclusion

The Conclusion must answer the research objective or research question directly and synthesize the principal contribution without merely repeating the Result and Discussion section.

  • state the main conclusion in relation to the research objective or question;
  • summarize the most important linguistic, empirical, analytical, or conceptual findings;
  • explain the academic contribution to linguistics or language studies;
  • state relevant implications for linguistic theory, language education, multilingual practice, language policy, translation, technology, documentation, or community language work;
  • acknowledge relevant limitations; and
  • identify appropriate directions for future research.
Academic Contribution
The conclusion should make explicit how the study advances linguistics or language scholarship—for example by refining theory, documenting underrepresented languages or varieties, contributing new empirical evidence, introducing a methodological or computational approach, improving language pedagogy, or clarifying implications for multilingualism, translation, language policy, documentation, or technology.
Important: Do not introduce new data, new literature, or entirely new arguments in the Conclusion.

3.9 Acknowledgments

Authors may acknowledge individuals, language communities, research assistants, transcribers, annotators, institutions, archives, laboratories, schools, organizations, funders, or other parties that supported the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Permission should be obtained where acknowledgment could identify private individuals or sensitive communities.

3.10 Declarations and Research Transparency

Authors must provide applicable declarations to support transparency, accountability, and research integrity.

Author Contributions

Describe each author's contribution clearly. The CRediT taxonomy may be used where appropriate, including conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. For linguistics research, relevant roles may also include corpus compilation, transcription, annotation, language-data curation, software development, statistical analysis, or fieldwork.

Funding

Identify all financial support, grant numbers, sponsoring institutions, fellowships, project funding, or other material support relevant to the research. If no external funding was received, state this explicitly.

Conflict of Interest

Disclose financial, institutional, personal, professional, academic, or other interests that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the work. When no conflict exists, use: “The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

Generative Artificial Intelligence Use Statement

Any permitted use of AI tools must be disclosed transparently, identifying the tool, purpose, and manuscript section(s) assisted. Authors remain fully responsible for all content. AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

For studies involving human participants, students, speakers, language communities, interviews, identifiable recordings, personal data, or other activities requiring ethical oversight, state the approving institution/committee and approval number where applicable. Confirm informed consent when required. If not applicable, state this clearly.

Data Availability Statement

Every submitted manuscript must include a Data Availability Statement indicating whether research data or supporting materials are available, where they can be accessed, and under what conditions. Restrictions relating to privacy, cultural sensitivity, participant consent, copyright, community data governance, archival rules, or third-party rights must be explained.

3.11 References

References must demonstrate a strong command of relevant, credible, and up-to-date scholarship. Every in-text citation must correspond to an entry in the reference list, and every listed reference must be cited in the manuscript.

Reference Style APA 7th Edition
Minimum References At least 30 references
Journal Articles At least 80% should consist of journal articles from reputable academic journals
Recency The majority should preferably come from the past 10 years, while seminal or foundational works may be retained when academically necessary
Reference Manager Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote, or equivalent software is strongly recommended
Reference Quality: Prioritize primary peer-reviewed scholarship. Blogs, commercial websites, anonymous sources, or non-academic materials should be avoided unless they constitute necessary primary objects of analysis. Excessive self-citation and irrelevant citation padding should be avoided.

4. Tables, Figures, Linguistic Examples, and Language Data

Tables
Tables should present processed and summarized information rather than raw software output. Number tables consecutively, provide clear titles, define abbreviations and units, identify sources, and refer to every table in the text.
Figures and Visualizations
Figures, diagrams, plots, spectrograms, maps, screenshots, corpus visualizations, and other visual materials must be clear, relevant, publication-ready, captioned, and cited in the text. Authors are responsible for permissions where copyright is held by third parties.
Linguistic Examples and Interlinear Glossing
Number linguistic examples consistently. Clearly distinguish object-language data from translations and commentary. Where interlinear glossed text is used, apply a recognized and consistent glossing convention, explain non-standard abbreviations, and identify the source of examples.
Transcriptions and Phonetic Data
Use consistent transcription conventions. IPA symbols, phonological notation, discourse transcription, conversation-analysis symbols, and annotation conventions should be explained where necessary and remain readable at publication size.
Corpus, Textual, and Community Language Materials
Corpus excerpts, quotations, social-media data, classroom discourse, archival language materials, and community-owned language data must be cited, anonymized where appropriate, and used in accordance with copyright, consent, platform, ethical, and community-governance requirements.

5. Generative Artificial Intelligence and AI-Assisted Technologies

Lingua permits limited, transparent, and responsible use of AI-based tools only where they support communication quality without replacing the authors' intellectual or scholarly contribution.

Permitted Support
Language editing, grammar and spelling correction, improving sentence clarity and readability without changing the scientific or scholarly meaning, and assisting with outline organization or the logical flow of an initial draft.
Prohibited Uses
Generating substantial portions or full sections of the manuscript; generating analyses, interpretations, or conclusions; fabricating or manipulating data, results, figures, images, or tables; inventing citations or references; or submitting AI-generated content without human verification and disclosure.
Disclosure: Any AI use must identify the tool, purpose, and section(s) assisted, normally in the Acknowledgments or Methods section. Authors remain fully responsible for accuracy, originality, copyright compliance, citations, analysis, interpretation, and conclusions. AI tools cannot be authors or co-authors.

6. Data, Corpora, Language Materials, and Research Accessibility

All submitted manuscripts must include a Data Availability Statement. Authors should state whether supporting data or research materials are included in the article, deposited in a repository, available from the corresponding author, or subject to legitimate restrictions.

  • Research materials may include datasets, corpora, coding frameworks, field notes, interview materials, transcripts, audio recordings, annotations, elicitation materials, analytical files, scripts, lexicons, or other documentation where sharing is ethically and legally appropriate.
  • Recognized repositories such as Zenodo, Figshare, Harvard Dataverse, Dryad, Open Science Framework, or suitable institutional/disciplinary repositories are encouraged where appropriate.
  • Shared files should include sufficient metadata and documentation to support scholarly verification, reuse, or secondary analysis where possible.
  • Restrictions arising from participant privacy, speaker consent, community protocols, archival conditions, copyright, community data governance, intellectual property, or contractual obligations must be explained clearly.
  • De-identified or aggregated data should be used where appropriate to protect participants.
  • Publicly deposited datasets or materials should be cited using a persistent identifier where available.
Open Science and Language-Data Responsibility: Transparency and reproducibility are encouraged, but data openness must not override ethical duties, copyright, participant consent, privacy, cultural sensitivity, indigenous/community rights, or legitimate restrictions on language data.

7. Appendices and Supplementary Materials

Appendices or supplementary materials may include interview protocols, questionnaires, elicitation instruments, extended coding frameworks, additional analytical tables, transcription conventions, glossing rules, corpus metadata, word lists, annotation guidelines, supplementary examples, audio files, scripts, code, or other materials that support the manuscript without interrupting the main narrative. All supplementary materials must be clearly labeled and referenced in the manuscript.

8. Peer Review and Revision

Initial Screening Scope, submission requirements, template compliance, originality, methodological quality, ethical suitability, and editorial relevance
Review Type Double-blind / double-anonymous
Reviewers Minimum two independent subject-matter experts in linguistics, language studies, or the relevant interdisciplinary field
Typical Review Duration Approximately 3–4 weeks for reviewer evaluation
Possible Decisions Acceptance, minor revision, major revision, rejection, or resubmission as a new submission after substantial changes
Revision Window Authors are normally given approximately three weeks to address reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript
Revision Response Authors should respond carefully to reviewer comments and clearly identify substantive changes in the revised manuscript
Final Decision Rests with the Editor-in-Chief after considering the handling editor's recommendation, reviewer reports, originality, scope relevance, quality, and ethical compliance

9. Similarity and Plagiarism Screening

Lingua uses Turnitin to evaluate manuscript similarity. A numerical similarity percentage does not replace editorial judgment; editors may examine the nature and source of overlap, citation practice, quotation, and paraphrasing.

Above 40% May lead to direct rejection because of substantial similarity, poor paraphrasing, or inappropriate quotation.
10%–40% May be returned for correction, improved citation, and appropriate paraphrasing depending on the nature of the overlap.
Required for Processing The manuscript should provide a Turnitin report showing less than 20% similarity, while ensuring all reused or quoted material is properly cited.

10. Open Access, Copyright, and Publication Charges

Lingua is an open-access journal. Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright while granting the journal a non-exclusive right to publish and disseminate the work.

Third-Party Materials: The CC BY license does not automatically remove restrictions attached to copyrighted third-party texts, figures, photographs, screenshots, test instruments, datasets, corpus materials, or other protected content. Authors must obtain necessary permissions and provide appropriate credit.
Article Processing Charge: For accepted articles, Lingua currently states an APC of USD 25 for international authors and Rp 350,000 for Indonesian authors (effective for accepted articles from August 2024). There is no article submission charge. Waiver and reviewer-discount provisions are described in the Journal Business Model and should be checked for current eligibility before submission.
Before You Submit

Final Manuscript Quality Check

The title contains no more than 16 words and clearly reflects the manuscript's focus.
Author names, affiliations, correspondence information, and metadata are complete and consistent.
The abstract is a single paragraph and clearly communicates background, novelty, method, findings, and conclusion/implications.
Exactly four keywords are provided and separated by semicolons.
The official template and automatic line numbering have been retained.
The manuscript follows Introduction – Method – Result and Discussion – Conclusion.
The Method section is transparent and appropriate to the linguistic or language-research design.
Linguistic examples, glosses, transcriptions, figures, corpus displays, and language data are clear, consistently formatted, credited, anonymized, and permission-cleared where required.
The Result and Discussion section interprets findings critically rather than merely describing them.
Applicable author contribution, funding, conflict of interest, AI, ethics/consent, and data availability statements are included.
At least 30 references are included, at least 80% are journal articles, and APA 7th edition is used consistently.
The manuscript has been proofread and a Turnitin report below 20% has been prepared.

Important Points to Remember

Aa
Clear Contribution
The linguistic or language-study contribution must be explicit.
Ethical Representation
Respect participants, speakers, language communities, privacy, and linguistic rights.
Template Discipline
Retain preset formatting and line numbering.
Quality Scholarship
Use current, relevant, peer-reviewed references.

Related Journal Policies

Authors should consult the current journal website for the complete and most recent versions of all editorial policies:

Author Guidelines journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/aguid
Focus and Scope journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/focus
Peer Review Process journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/prp
AI Usage Policy journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/ai
Plagiarism Policy journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/pp
Data Sharing Policy journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/datasharing
Conflict of Interest journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/conflictofinterest
Journal Business Model / APC journal.idscipub.com/index.php/lingua/jbm

Before Final Submission

Authors should carefully review the manuscript, official template, permissions for language data and third-party materials, publication ethics, similarity report, declarations, supporting data, submission metadata, and the journal's current policies before completing submission. Compliance with these requirements will assist the Editorial Team in conducting an efficient initial screening and peer-review process.