“Bring” Without a Dedicated Verb: Deictic Motion Constructions in Shupamem

Authors

  • Ernest Njifon Ngoupayou Université de Dschang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v4i2.1449

Keywords:

shupamem, grass fields bantu languages, verb, to bring

Abstract

There is not a counterpart of the verb “to bring” in Shupamem i.e. in this language, there is not a specific verb that means “to bring”. In this vein, this paper looks at the various strategies that are used to denote the action “of bringing” in Shupamem. Building on Shupamem data provided by nine informants through the elicitation namely questionnaires, interviews and documents, it is revealed that there is not a one-to-one correspondence of “to bring” in Shupamem, as it is the case in languages like French and English for instance. Fundamentally, Shupamem realizes “bring” meaning through deictic motion verbs rather than a dedicated transfer verb. In this language, there are three verbs that are used when one is asking someone to bring something or somebody. These three verbs are twó (to come), já (to come) and lú (go). In Shupamem, “bring” arises via deictic motion verbs plus an object NP, with imperative-specific constraints for já and interchangeability conditions for twó/lú. More specifically, when twó (to come) and lú (go) are followed by an NP it means “to bring”. Whereas in imperative sentences, when já (to come) is followed by an NP it means “to bring”. It is shown that já (to come) is only used in imperative structures. Finally, it is revealed that only twó (to come) and lú (go) are interchangeable and this is in both monoclausal and embedded structures.

References

Botne, R. (2006). Motion, time, and tense: On the grammaticalization of come and go to future markers in Bantu. Studies in African Linguistics, 35(2), 127–188. https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v35i2.107307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v35i2.107307

Bussmann, H. (1996). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. Routledge.

Chen, S. (2025). Encoding Chinese metaphorical motion: a typological perspective. Linguistics Vanguard, 11(1), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0029

Crane, T., Mabena, N., & Mabena, M. P. (2019). Time, Space, Modality, and (Inter)subjectivity: Futures in Ndebele and other Nguni Languages. South African Journal of African Languages, 39(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2019.1672333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2019.1672333

Dieu, M., & Renaud, P. (1983). Atlas Linguistique de l’Afrique Centrale (ALCAM): Situation linguistique en Afrique centrale, inventaire préliminaire, le Cameroun. ACCT, CERDOTOLA, DGRST.

Ganesha, H. R., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). How to Choose an Appropriate Research Data Collection Method and Method Choice Among Various Research Data Collection Methods and Method Choices During Ph.D. Program in India? International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 7(2), 455–489. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0233

Helmie, J., Kurniawati, N., & Waroka, T. S. (2022). Analysis of English clause patterns: (a qualitative analytical on clause pattern in novel). Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching, 10(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v10i2.2562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v10i2.2562

Holmatova, M. O. K. (2022). English motion verbs and their semantic features. Scientific Progress, 3(6), 71–73.

Matateyou, E. (2002). Parlons Bamoun. L’Harmattan.

Mazhar, S. A., Anjum, R., Anwar, A. I., & Khan, A. A. (2021). Methods of Data Collection: A Fundamental Tool of Research. J Integ Comm Health, 10(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.24321/2319.9113.202101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2319.9113.202101

Menete, S. N., & Guiying, J. (2024). Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion. Folia Linguistica, 58(2), 401–439. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2024-2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2024-2016

Misago, M.-J. (2018). Les verbes de mouvement et l’expression du lieu en Kirundi (bantou, JD62): Une étude linguistique basée sur un corpus. Ghent University.

Njifon Ngoupayou, E. (2017). La Structure de la Phrase Interrogative en Shupamem. Université de Yaoundé I.

Njifon Ngoupayou, E. (2023a). The reinforcer in Shupamem. In G. Dieu & C. Kuankem (Eds.), A Multidimensional Study of Reinforcers in African Languages (pp. 75–88). Lincom Europa.

Njifon Ngoupayou, E. (2023b). The Verb Phrase in Shupamem. Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(4), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2023.v06i04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2023.v06i04.004

Octasary, M., Pratiwi, N., & Lestari, S. A. B. (2024). Dependent or Independent? A Deep Dive into Students’ Clause Identification. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 7(4), 532–537. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v7i4.41700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v7i4.41700

Othman, W. (2025). Metaphorical motion in modern Arabic fiction (1970–2022): analysing the use of motion verbs and manner. Cognitive Linguistics, 36(4), 673–706. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2024-0087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2024-0087

Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2009). On the acquisition of motion verbs cross-linguistically. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 351–365.

Podolsăk, M. (2025). Motion Metaphors in Swedish Political Speeches. Stockholm University, Department of Swedish Language and Multilingualism.

Rodríguez-Navarro, L. Q. (2004). Verb Phrases and Noun Phrases in English: A Parallel Approach. University of Granada.

Saady, D. S. (2020). Reduced clauses in English and Kurdish. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 27(5), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.27.5.2020.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.27.5.2020.24

Sani, L. I. (2013). Data collection techniques: a guide for researchers in humanities and education. International Research Journal of Computer Science and Information Systems, 2(3), 40–44.

Sarda, L. (2019). French motion verbs: Insights into the status of locative PPs. In M. Aurnague & D. Stosic (Eds.), Human Cognitive Processing: The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French: Descriptive, Experimental and Formal Studies on Motion Expression (Vol. 66, pp. 68–107). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.02sar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.66.02sar

Shen, L. (2025). Constrained communication of motion events: Exploring shared cognitive constraints in Chinese-French translation tasks. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00218.she DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00218.she

Sitoe, B. (2001). Verbs of motion in Changana.

Soroli, E., & Verkerk, A. (2017). Motion events in Greek: Methodological and typological issues. Cogni Texte: Revue de l’Association Française de Linguistique Cognitive. https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.889

Stapleton, A. (2017). Deixis in Modern Linguistics. Essex Student Journal, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5526/esj23

Sukmawati, Sudarmin, & Salmia. (2023). Development of quality instruments and data collection techniques. Jurnal Pendidikan & Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v6i1.7527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v6i1.7527

Tenny, C. (1995). How motion verbs are special: The interaction of semantic and pragmatic information in aspectual verb meanings. Pragmatics & Cognition, 3(1), 31–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.3.1.06ten DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.3.1.06ten

Tusun, A., & Hendriks, H. (2022). Caused motion events in Modern Uyghur: a typological perspective. Linguistics, 60(5), 1663–1705. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0098

Wang, C. (2018). Deictic Verbs in Modern Linguistics. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 283, 481–487. https://doi.org/10.2991/cesses-18.2018.108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/cesses-18.2018.108

Wang, Y., & Wei, L. (2021). Cognitive restructuring in the multilingual mind: language-specific effects on processing efficiency of caused motion events in Cantonese-English-Japanese speakers. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 24(4), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000018

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ngoupayou, E. N. (2026). “Bring” Without a Dedicated Verb: Deictic Motion Constructions in Shupamem. Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language, 4(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v4i2.1449

Issue

Section

Articles