Barriers and Opportunities in Fostering Pragmatic Competence in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v2i4.1044Keywords:
Pragmatic Competence, Digital Communication, Intercultural Learning, Computer-Mediated Communication, Adaptive Learning, Virtual Reality, Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
This study reviews the development of pragmatic competence within digital communication platforms, aiming to synthesize evidence from recent literature and assess both opportunities and challenges. The review employs a systematic methodology, drawing from databases including JSTOR, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Wiley Online Library, and applying inclusion criteria covering studies published between 2015 and 2024. The findings highlight five central themes: authenticity and context, intercultural diversity, personalization and adaptivity, technological barriers and access gaps, and the potential of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, gaming, and virtual reality. Evidence shows that authentic digital contexts and intercultural exchanges foster pragmatic awareness, while adaptive learning technologies enhance individualized instruction. However, significant barriers persist, including infrastructural inequalities, socio-economic disparities, and digital literacy gaps that constrain equitable access to pragmatic learning. Comparative studies suggest that learners in technologically advanced regions benefit more readily from these innovations than those in developing contexts. The discussion links these findings to pragmatic theory, emphasizing the role of systemic factors such as policy and infrastructure, and identifies the need for inclusive strategies to ensure equal opportunities. Recommendations include the development of longitudinal and cross-cultural research, as well as practical integration of advanced technologies into mainstream education. Overall, the study underscores the urgent need for combined strategies that integrate authenticity, intercultural awareness, personalization, and technological innovation to enhance pragmatic competence in digital communication.
References
Alsalem, N. (2024). Request strategies in saudi esl learners’ email communication: a pragmatic analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 540-546. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.22
Beko, L., & Mićović, D. (2022). Theory of practice and a brief overview of task design in university clil teaching – an example of geomythology. Филолог – Часопис За Језик Књижевност И Културу, 13(25), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2225203b DOI: https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2225203b
Beltrán‐Palanques, V., & Querol-Julián, M. (2018). English language learners’ spoken interaction: what a multimodal perspective reveals about pragmatic competence. System, 77, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.01.008
Benabdelkader, A. (2019). Expert–novice negotiation within learning opportunities in online intercultural interactions. Languages, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4010014
Biran, M., Ben‐David, N., & Icht, M. (2025). Coffee talks: positive effects of a friendly visitor program on pragmatic competence and language production skills in adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251327702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295251327702
Cruz, M. (2018). Pragmatic competence injustice. Social Epistemology, 32(3), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2018.1458351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2018.1458351
Frolli, A., Savarese, G., Carmine, F., Bosco, A., Saviano, E., Rega, A., … & Ricci, M. (2022). Children on the autism spectrum and the use of virtual reality for supporting social skills. Children, 9(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020181
González‐Lloret, M. (2019). Technology and l2 pragmatics learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190519000047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000047
González‐Lloret, M. (2024). Technology-enhanced pragmatic instruction. Applied Pragmatics, 6(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00023.gon DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00023.gon
Hlavač, J., Xu, Z., & Xiong, Y. (2015). Intercultural pragmatics at work: (self-)perceptions of intercultural behavior of chinese and english speakers and interpreters in healthcare interactions. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0004
Klimczak-Pawlak, A. (2019). English for european communication and tourism: focus on pragmatic competence. Research in Language, 17(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.17.3.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.17.3.06
Law, J., Tamayo, N., McKean, C., & Rush, R. (2021). The role of social and emotional adjustment in mediating the relationship between early experiences and different language outcomes. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.654213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.654213
Liu, S., & Kinginger, C. (2021). The sociocultural ontogenesis of international students’ use of pragmatic strategies in elf academic communication: two contrasting case studies. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.022
Mseideen, A., Yunus, K., & Almahasees, Z. (2025). The impact of online learning on the pragmatic competence of refusal speech acts: perspectives of jordanian instructors. Forum for Linguistic Studies. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8632
Núñez-Román, F., Camacho, A., Fernández-Juliá, O., & Quintero-Rodríguez, I. (2024). English code-mixings in whatsapp interactions among spanish adolescents and their orthographic competence. International Journal of Bilingualism, 29(3), 534-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241229397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241229397
Padilla-Carmona, M., Suárez-Ortega, M., & Sánchez-García, M. (2016). Inclusión digital de los estudiantes adultos que acceden a la universidad: análisis de sus actitudes y competencias digitales. Revista Complutense De Educación, 27(3), 1229-1246. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_rced.2016.v27.n3.47669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2016.v27.n3.47669
Pan, Z. (2023). The use of english pragmatic markers by learners of english in interlanguage communication. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2652-2662. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.24
Qi, X., & Chen, Z. (2025). A systematic review of technology integration in developing l2 pragmatic competence. Education Sciences, 15(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020172
Rafiq, R., & Yavuz, M. (2024). Advancing english as second language communication: the effectiveness of online pragmatic training on essential speech acts. Heliyon, 10(11), e31763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31763
Sánchez‐Hernández, A., & Martínez‐Flor, A. (2021). Teaching the pragmatics of english as an international language: a focus on pragmatic markers. Language Teaching Research, 26(2), 256-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064933
Sydorenko, T., Daurio, P., & Thorne, S. (2017). Refining pragmatically-appropriate oral communication via computer-simulated conversations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1-2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1394326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1394326
Zhang, Y. (2022). A mixed-methods study of computer-mediated communication paired with instruction on efl learners' pragmatic competence. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.291113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.291113
