Transitional Justice and Sustainable Peace: Comparative Insights and Policy Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis.v3i4.796Keywords:
Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Societies, Truth Commissions, Community-Based Justice, Gender And Reconciliation, Economic Reparations, Sustainable PeaceAbstract
Transitional justice plays a pivotal role in restoring peace and accountability in societies emerging from conflict. This narrative review explores the mechanisms employed across various post-conflict settings, aiming to understand their effectiveness and contextual relevance. Using systematic literature search methods across databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, the review analyzed peer-reviewed articles, research reports, and gray literature published within the last decade. Boolean search strategies and specific inclusion criteria were applied to identify studies focused on formal legal structures, community-based practices, gendered experiences, economic reparations, environmental considerations, and cross-national comparisons. The findings reveal that while international tribunals contribute to legal precedent, their detachment from local realities often limits community impact. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRCs) have helped articulate historical grievances, but their effectiveness depends heavily on political will and institutional support. Informal mechanisms rooted in local culture offer promising pathways for healing and legitimacy, especially when integrated with civil society participation. Gender-sensitive approaches enhance justice outcomes by addressing violence against women and ensuring female representation. Furthermore, economic and environmental justice are increasingly recognized as integral to sustainable post-conflict recovery. Comparative cases from Timor Leste, Guatemala, and Bosnia highlight the importance of local engagement and context-specific adaptation of global frameworks. This study emphasizes the urgency of systemic reforms, inclusive policy-making, and long-term investments in justice mechanisms. It advocates for further research to overcome methodological challenges and supports multi-level strategies that center on community empowerment and resilience.
References
Avi-Guy, O. (2021). Transformation – overcoming the limits of liberal peace and transitional justice in deeply divided societies: reconciliation in liberal peace theory. Israel Law Review, 54(3), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223721000169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223721000169
Besmel, P. and Alvarez, A. (2018). Transitional justice and the legacy of Nuremberg: the promise and problems of confronting atrocity in post-conflict societies. Genocide Studies International, 11(2), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.3138/gsi.11.2.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/gsi.11.2.03
Binningsbø, H., Drange, B., & Loyle, C. (2023). Justice now and later: how measures taken to address wrongdoings during armed conflict affect postconflict justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 17(2), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijad015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijad015
Brucato, G. (2019). Children of societies transitioning to peace: an instance for moral recognition. Journal of Global Ethics, 15(3), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1695650 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1695650
Destrooper, T. and Parmentier, S. (2017). Gender-aware and place-based transitional justice in Guatemala. Social & Legal Studies, 27(3), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917718050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917718050
Dudai, R. (2017). Transitional justice as social control: political transitions, human rights norms and the reclassification of the past. British Journal of Sociology, 69(3), 691-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12300
Duić, D. (2021). Impact of the new pact on migration and asylum on child refugees and unaccompanied minors. Balkan Social Science Review, 17, 117-142. https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr21170117d DOI: https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR21170117d
Fang, F. and Yu, X. (2023). Violence, responsibility and best interests: children rights in Elizabeth Harrower’s A Few Days in the Country and Other Stories. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 8(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2013
Ferguson, L. (2013). Not merely rights for children but children’s rights: the theory gap and the assumption of the importance of children’s rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21(2), 177-208. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-55680015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-55680015
Finlay, W., Cattier, J., Donois, K., Goodings, L., Kaminskiy, E., Owen, C., … & Swami, V. (2024). Norms concerning the recognition of victimhood in postconflict societies: an analysis of “whatabouteries” in online sectarian arguments. Political Psychology, 46(1), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12988
Friedman, R. (2017). Competing memories. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316874950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316874950
Garayová, L. (2025). Legal protections for children in refugee and migrant crises in Central and Eastern Europe. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1585607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1585607
Gómez, C. (2021). Social solidarity as a dimension of transitional justice: the case of cartography and identification of mass graves in post-conflict Colombia. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(1), 50-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1895763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1895763
Lang, C. (2022). Building the rule of law in post-conflict states: international v. mixed model of transitional justice. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 25(1), 61-90. https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-25010003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-25010003
Margaletić, A. and Šimović, I. (2024). Child representation in cases before the European Court of Human Rights. Pravni Vjesnik, 40(4), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/32050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/32050
McAuliffe, E. and Mitchel, Y. (2024). Offering protection to immigrant youths in America: is asylum or special immigrant juvenile status truly in the best interest of the child?. International Social Science Journal, 74(254), 1675-1690. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12528
Muvingi, I. (2016). Donor-driven transitional justice and peacebuilding. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 11(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2016.1146566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2016.1146566
Nigam, S. (2024). Guardianship law in India: examining the principle of ‘best interests’ of minors and the rights of single mothers as sole guardians. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 31(3), 308-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/09715215241262137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09715215241262137
Pham, P., Balthazard, M., Gibbons, N., & Vinck, P. (2019). Perspectives on memory, forgiveness and reconciliation in Cambodia's post-Khmer Rouge society. International Review of the Red Cross, 101(910), 125-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383119000213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383119000213
Redwood, H. and Wedderburn, A. (2019). A cat-and-maus game: the politics of truth and reconciliation in post-conflict comics. Review of International Studies, 45(4), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210519000147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210519000147
Rukooko, A. and Silverman, J. (2019). The International Criminal Court and Africa: a fractious relationship assessed. African Human Rights Law Journal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a5
Santamaría, Á., Acosta, M., & Fernandez, M. (2020). Transitional justice and indigenous jurisdictions processes in Colombia. pp. 686–710. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0423-9.ch035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0423-9.ch035
Sarkin, J. and Bhandari, R. (2020). Why political appointments to truth commissions cause difficulties for these institutions: using the crisis in the transitional justice process in Nepal to understand how matters of legitimacy and credibility undermine such commissions. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(2), 444-470. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa001
Schultz, J. and Vedsted-Hansen, J. (2025). Article 8 ECHR and the ‘temporary turn’ in European asylum policies. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x251338505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X251338505
Sehmi, A. (2024). Legacies of colonial violence in contemporary transitional justice: memories of Mau Mau, the ‘Kapenguria Six’ and the ‘Ocampo Six’ in Kenya. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 18(1), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijae005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijae005
Stojanowska, W. and Kosek, M. (2019). Zagrożenie dobra dziecka przez nieprofesjonalne próby tworzenia nowego kodeksu rodzinnego. Krytyka Prawa, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.347
Thomson, M. (2021). A capabilities approach to best interests assessments. Legal Studies, 41(2), 276-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2020.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2020.47
Yakinthou, C. and Croeser, S. (2016). Transforming Tunisia: transitional justice and internet governance in a post-revolutionary society. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(2), 230-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijw004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijw004
