Digital Constitutionalism and the Future of Human Rights: A Comparative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis.v3i1.791Keywords:
Constitutionalism, Human Rights, Rule Of Law, Judicial Independence, Digital Rights, Comparative Constitutional Law, Transnational Legal FrameworksAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive narrative review of the evolving relationship between constitutionalism and the protection of human rights in various global contexts. The primary aim is to explore how constitutional frameworks adapt to contemporary challenges and uphold human rights amid increasing political complexity and technological transformation. A rigorous literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar with keywords including "constitutionalism," "human rights evolution," "rule of law," "limited government," and "comparative constitutional law." The review synthesized findings from comparative legal studies, case law analysis, and theoretical literature. The results indicate a growing reliance on constitutional courts to safeguard fundamental rights, especially in jurisdictions like Germany, Poland, and Colombia. However, systemic barriers such as weak institutions and political interference continue to challenge effective constitutional implementation. Regional differences further complicate the picture, with the EU promoting supranational human rights standards, while Latin America advances progressive constitutional reforms, and parts of the Islamic world grapple with integrating Sharia principles. The emergence of digital constitutionalism adds a new dimension to this discourse, calling for regulatory frameworks that protect digital rights. Civil society’s role is increasingly significant in shaping these legal evolutions. In conclusion, reinforcing judicial independence, integrating global legal norms, and fostering public awareness are critical to strengthening constitutionalism. Future research should prioritize the impact of digital governance and transnational jurisprudence on human rights.
References
Baer, S. (2023). The evolution and gestalt of the German constitution, 163–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.003.0004
Kravets, I. (2023). Dignitatis humanae and human rights in philosophical and legal existence and in contemporary constitutionalism: Division and reunification. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.304
Marino, T., Carvalho, L., & Nascimento, J. (2021). A corte interamericana de direitos humanos e a proteção dos direitos LGBTI: Construindo um ius constitutionale commune baseado na diversidade. Revista Brasileira De Políticas Públicas, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v11i2.7382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v11i2.7382
Neto, J., Fabel, L., & Gomes, M. (2022). Constitucionalismo ou governança global? O pragmatismo na busca por um desenvolvimento sustentável. Opinión Jurídica, 20(43), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v20n43a20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v20n43a20
Ooms, G., & Hammonds, R. (2016). Global constitutionalism, applied to global health governance: Uncovering legitimacy deficits and suggesting remedies. Globalization and Health, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0216-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0216-2
Petersmann, E. (2021). Neo-liberal, state-capitalist and ordo-liberal conceptions of world trade: The rise and fall of the WTO dispute settlement system, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501638_002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501638_002
Porras‐Gómez, A. (2020). The new Arab bills of rights: A study on the constitutions of Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 9(1), 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-00901003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00901003
Souza-Fernandes, L., & Fernandes, A. (2024). Pioneirismo legislativo no cenário brasileiro: Aquífero carbogasoso de Cambuquira - MG com status de ‘sujeito de direito’. Derbyana, 45. https://doi.org/10.69469/derb.v45.822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69469/derb.v45.822
Szwast, M., Szwed, M., & Starski, P. (2023). The evolution and gestalt of the Polish constitution, 431–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.003.0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.003.0009
Teixeira, A., & Bragato, F. (2021). Direitos humanos, constitucionalismo transnacional e redução das desigualdades raciais: Desafios pós-pandemia de COVID-19. Revista De Investigações Constitucionais, 8(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v8i1.74326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v8i1.74326
Tebar, W., & Alves, F. (2021). Justiciabilidade direta dos direitos sociais na Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos: Mais uma peça no quebra-cabeça do ius constitutionale commune latino-americano? Revista Brasileira De Políticas Públicas, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v11i2.7772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v11i2.7772
Tusseau, G. (2023). The evolution and gestalt of the French constitution, 109–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.003.0003
Yáñez, K., & Maldonado, F. (2021). Construcción de espacios transnacionales: El nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano. Foro Revista De Derecho. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2021.35.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2021.35.8
Yilma, K. (2025). Reimagining digital constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381725100014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381725100014
The Doctrine of Limited Government in the Legal Positions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (2025). Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 8(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-8.1-a000107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-8.1-a000107
The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726425.001.0001
Malko, A. V, Gur’ev, V. V, Zatonsky, V. A., & Krotkova, N. V. (2021). Legal culture, legal policy and human rights (Review materials of scientific-practical conference). Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2021(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520013680-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520013680-9
McClennen, S. A. (2010). The humanities, human rights, and the: Comparative imagination (pp. 36–57). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84896196941&partnerID=40&md5=eb3957e30c38188a4d8bc9da908a2411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq6sb.5
Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an Internet Bill of Rights. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757121
Saputra, R., Zaid, M., & Emovwodo, S. O. (2022). The Court Online Content Moderation: A Constitutional Framework. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(3), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.54
