The Role of Institutions and Culture in Shaping Law and Morality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis.v2i4.790Keywords:
Law And Morality, Legal Pluralism, Institutional Reform, Legal Ethics, Customary Law, Human Rights, Legal LegitimacyAbstract
This narrative review explores the dynamic interplay between legal positivism and natural law within contemporary legal systems, emphasizing their convergence in contexts of legal pluralism. The study aims to analyze how law and morality intersect and influence regulatory effectiveness across various jurisdictions. Drawing from academic databases including JSTOR, Scopus, and Web of Science, the review applies qualitative content analysis of peer-reviewed literature, focusing on legal frameworks, institutional roles, and sociocultural factors. Findings indicate significant regional differences in how legal systems balance statutory authority with ethical norms. European Union nations often implement value-driven regulations grounded in human rights and democratic accountability, while authoritarian regimes and postcolonial states face challenges due to institutional fragility and legal dualism. Institutions play a critical role in norm-setting and public trust, with successful cases demonstrating that moral legitimacy enhances legal compliance. Sociocultural factors further mediate the public’s response to laws, revealing tensions where formal law diverges from local values. Interventions such as EU compliance mechanisms and participatory justice reforms show promise in bridging the law-morality divide. The review underscores the urgency for systemic reform, advocating inclusive policy frameworks that integrate moral reasoning and community-based legal practices. These insights offer a roadmap for future research and policy interventions aimed at creating more just, culturally responsive legal systems.
References
Brownlee, K. & Child, R. (2017). Can the law help us to be moral? Jurisprudence, 9(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2017.1352317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2017.1352317
Campbell, T. (2015). Law and morality: an analytical perspective, 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.63044-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63044-1
Clark, D. (2015). Legal systems, classification of, 800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86078-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86078-X
Gutiérrez, C. (2022). The Mexican Supreme Court and its contributions to democratic transition. An approach from legal philosophy. Problema Anuario De Filosofía Y Teoría Del Derecho, 193–227. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2022.16.17043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2022.16.17043
Hadziselimovic, A. (2019). Social justice and artificial intelligence by Dr. Adnan Hadzi (University of Malta). Body Space & Technology, 18(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.318
Lavis, S. (2018). The distorted jurisprudential discourse of Nazi law: Uncovering the ‘rupture thesis’ in the Anglo-American legal academy. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique, 31(4), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-017-9538-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-017-9538-5
Mattos, D. (2021). Seria Hobbes um jusnaturalista? Revista De Filosofia Aurora, 33(60). https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.33.060.ao01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/1980-5934.33.060.AO01
Petersmann, E. (2016). Methodology problems in international economic law and adjudication. Jindal Global Law Review, 7(2), 279–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-016-0033-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-016-0033-8
Pino, G. (2021). Sources of law, 58–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848871.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848871.003.0003
Thompson, J. (2019). Law’s autonomy and moral reason. Laws, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws8010006
Waltermann, A. (2018). Sovereignty and validity: On the relation between the concepts and the role of acceptance, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_11
Wendel, W. (2014). Ethics and law. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107337114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114
Abe, O. (2022). Implementing Business and Human Rights Norms in Africa: Law and Policy Interventions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003290124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003290124
Gurinskaya, A., Nalla, M. K., & Paek, S. Y. (2024). Exploring the Determinants of Citizens’ Compliance with COVID-19 Regulations: Legitimacy Versus Fear. Criminal Justice Review, 49(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231190471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168231190471
Madden, S., & Alt, R. A. (2021). More Than a “Bad Apple”: Applying an Ethics of Care Perspective to a Collective Crisis. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 5(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v5.i1.p24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v5.i1.p24
Malko, A. V, Gur’ev, V. V, Zatonsky, V. A., & Krotkova, N. V. (2021). Legal culture, legal policy and human rights (Review materials of scientific-practical conference). Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2021(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520013680-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S102694520013680-9
Nonet, P. (2017). Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203787540
Shapira, R. (2016). Reputation through litigation: How the legal system shapes behavior by producing information. Washington Law Review, 91(3), 1193–1252. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84992323167&partnerID=40&md5=4c78f763adfe19f8585a587fc194df85
Veresha, R. (2018). Corruption-related offences: Articulation of pervasive prevention mechanisms. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21(4), 1–12. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061115106&partnerID=40&md5=7616e31e360d3351a105a30c58ce80bd
Yimer, G. (2024). The Nexus Between Legal Pluralism and Inclusive Finance: Insights from Ethiopia and South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71653-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71653-9
