The Role of Justice Law Enforcement By Judges In Handling Criminal Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis.v3i2.515Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Judges, Criminal CasesAbstract
Law enforcement is a process of making efforts to reinforce the existing legal norms. One of the parties that plays a role in law enforcement is the judge. The role of judges in law enforcement, especially criminal law, is very urgent in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This is because the judge is the one who decides a case through his decision which will always be the concern of justice seekers. Therefore, in handling cases, the judge is impartial and may not be influenced by any party, so that his decision can realize a sense of justice in society. The research method used in this writing is the normative legal research method using secondary data obtained through literature studies. The focus of this research is the role of judges in law enforcement, especially in handling criminal cases through their just decisions.
References
Arief, I. S. (2020). Optimalisasi Peran Hakim Dalam Upaya Perdamaian di Persidangan. Badilag Mahkamah Agung.
Aripin, R. et al. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Terdakwa dalam Proses Hukum ditinjau dari Prinsip Hukum “In Dubio Pro Reo.” Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(1).
Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam distem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i2.789
Asikin, Z. (2020). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Kaidah. Rajawali Press.
Dewi, E. (2010). Peranan Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. PRANATA HUKUM, 5(2).
Erickson, D. J. et al. (2015). Enforcement of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Laws in the United States: A National Survey of State and Local Agencies. Traffic Injury Prevention, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.995789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.995789
Fadillah, S. et al. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i5.433
Harahap, I. P. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Bagi Hakim Dalam Menetapkan Putusan Dalam Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan Negeri Padangsidimpua. Jurnal Justitia, 1(4).
Harahap, M. Y. (1985). Pembahasan Permasalahan Penerapan KUHAP. Pustaka Kartini.
Hariri, W. U. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Pustaka Setia.
Lubis, S. K. (2002). Etika Profesi Hakim. Sinar Grafika.
Manullang, H. (2022). Sumber-Sumber Hukum. SADA, Kurnia Pustaka.
Mochtar Eddy O.S, Z. A. and H. (2023). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Nuraeny, H. (2016). Tindak Pidana Perdangangan Orang Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Nurhalimah, S. (2017). Integritas Hakim Indonesia. Buletin Hukum Dan Keadilan ADALAH, 1(2c). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v1i2.8205
Oktafiani Syaiful, S. and M. (2024). Analisis Putusan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Suap oleh Hakim Sudrajad Dimyati. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(5).
Purwoleksono, D. E. (2014). Hukum Pidana. Airlangga University Press (AUP).
Rahardjo, S. (2020). Ilmu Hukum. CitraAditya Bakti.
Ridlwan, Z. (2012). Negara Hukum Indonesia Kebalikan Nachtwachterstaat. Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v5no2.56
Rosadi, E. (2016). Putusan Hakim yang Berkeadilan. Badamai Law Journal, 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v1i2.1850
Santoso Eva Achjani, T. and Z. (2016). Kriminologi. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Siahaan, M. (2020). Menghukum Koruptor dan Pencucian Uang Tanpa Unsur Kesalahan. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Sujana I Wayan, I. G. and K. (2024). Indikator Lemahnya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.60153/ijolares.v2i2.67
Unas, S. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Bentuk Putusan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Et Societatis, 7(4).
Wantu, F. M. (2013). Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan Di Peradilan Perdata. MIMBAR HUKUM, 25(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16092
