Improving Science Learning Outcomes Through the Implementation of the Inquiry Learning Model During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Class IX-A Students of SMP Negeri 1 Bendungan for the 2021/2022 Academic Year

Authors

  • Edy Elly Susanto SMP Negeri 2 Bendungan, Indonesia
  • Amer Shebl Zaya Al-Mustansiriya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v1i1.24

Keywords:

Learning outcomes, inquiry learning, model

Abstract

This type of research is Classroom Action Research (CAR). The purpose of this classroom action research (CAR) is to find out how far the improvement of student learning outcomes in science subjects in Fermentation material by applying the Inquiry Learning model. In this classroom action research (CAR), it is carried out in 2 cycles, from the results of the actions taken it is proven to be able to improve student learning outcomes by achieving the classical mastery that is set at 85%. Classical completeness 73.3% obtained in the first cycle, can be increased in the second cycle to 87%. In terms of student activity, there was also an increase, namely in the first cycle, the moderately active category increased to an active category. The results of this action research show that the implementation of the Covid-19 Learning Period Inquiry Learning Model can improve student learning outcomes in science lessons on electrical. Material with completeness reaching 87 % At the end of cycle II.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi et al. 2017.Classroom action research. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy. Daryanto and Karim, Syaiful. 2017.21st Century Learning.Yogyakarta: Gava Media

Ministry of Education. 2003.Republic of Indonesia Law No. 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System. Jakarta

Ministry of National Education. 2007.National Education System Law Amendments to the 1945 Constitution.

Ministry of Education and Culture.Learning Models.Educational and Cultural Human Resources Development Agency and Education Quality Assurance.

N.W. Anggraeni, et al. 2013. "Implementation of Inquiry Learning Strategies on the Implementation of Inquiry Learning Strategies on Critical Thinking Abilities and Understanding of Science Concepts for Middle School Students." Singaraja: Ganesha Education University Postgraduate Program e-Journal. Volume 3.

Nasution, S. 2001.Metode Research (Scientific research). Jakarta: Bina Literacy.

GO Learning Guidance Center. 2016.Revolution Learning Basic Concepts & The King.Bandung Rustaman, N, 2005. "Development of Deep Inquiry-Based Learning Research

Science Education”. FPMIPA UPI

Rustaman, N. 2002.Questioning Skills in Science Learning.Democratic Teaching Training Materials for Middle School Science Teachers in Bandung City. Ministry of Education.

Sudjana, Nana. 2004.Basics of the Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensido Offset.

Sugiyono. 2009.Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta

Valiant Lukad Perdana Sutrisno and Budi Tri Siswanto. 2016. "Factors that influence student learning outcomes in vocational school automotive electrical practical learning in Yogyakarta City." Yogyakarta: Journal of Vocational Education. Volume 6, No 1, February 2016 (111-120).

Wahyudi, Eko. 2015.Science Lantern Journal.Volume 5 Volume I May 2015.

Widiasworo, Erwin. 2017.Strategies & Methods for Teaching Students Outside the Classroom (Outdoor Learning) Actively, Creatively, Inspirationally and Communicatively.Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Aksa, F. I. (2022). Inquiry-based learning: A pedagogical tool to improving understanding of natural hazards. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/JAMBA.V14I1.1323

Clark, N., & Hsu, J. L. (2023). Insight from Biology Program Learning Outcomes: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. CBE Life Sciences Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-09-0177

Davis, K. A., & Knight, D. B. (2023). Assessing learning processes rather than outcomes: using critical incidents to explore student learning abroad. Higher Education, 85(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00836-6

Haider, M. Q., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2022). Examining Learning Outcomes of Inquiry-Oriented Instruction in Introductory Linear Algebra Classes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2096

Han, F. (2023). Level of consistency between students’ self-reported and observed study approaches in flipped classroom courses: How does it influence students’ academic learning outcomes? PLoS ONE, 18(6 JUNE). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286549

Khanittanuphong, P., Iamthanaporn, K., & Bvonpanttarananon, J. (2022). The impact of the transition from flipped classroom to online lectures on learning outcomes and student satisfaction in a rehabilitation medicine clerkship during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03959-7

Nikou, S., & Maslov, I. (2023). Finnish university students’ satisfaction with e-learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2022-0166

Plaat, A., Kosters, W., & Preuss, M. (2023). High-accuracy model-based reinforcement learning, a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(9), 9541–9573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10335-w

Prihadi, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of SIHyL (Spatial Inquiry Hybrid Learning) Model in Improving Students’ Spatial Citizenship in Geographic Learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(4), 634–642. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.4.1847

Putu Verawati, N. N. S., Harjono, A., & Gummah, S. (2022). Inquiry-Creative Learning Integrated with Ethnoscience: Efforts to Encourage Prospective Science Teachers’ Critical Thinking in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.13

Ribeiro, J. G., Rodrigues, G., Sardinha, A., & Melo, F. S. (2023). TEAMSTER: Model-based reinforcement learning for ad hoc teamwork. Artificial Intelligence, 324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104013

Sutton, R. S., Machado, M. C., Holland, G. Z., Szepesvari, D., Timbers, F., Tanner, B., & White, A. (2023). Reward-respecting subtasks for model-based reinforcement learning. Artificial Intelligence, 324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.104001

Zhao, L., Zhu, R., Cai, X., & Zhang, J. (2023). Improving Sustainability of Learning Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Medical Students’ Autonomous Learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075668

Downloads

Published

2023-10-11

How to Cite

Susanto, E. E., & Zaya, A. S. (2023). Improving Science Learning Outcomes Through the Implementation of the Inquiry Learning Model During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Class IX-A Students of SMP Negeri 1 Bendungan for the 2021/2022 Academic Year. Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight, 1(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v1i1.24