Analysis of Prospective Teacher Students Errors in Making Math Test Instruments Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Revised
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.131Keywords:
math test, evaluation, Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised, HOTSAbstract
This study aims to describe the errors of prospective teacher students in making math test instruments based on cognitive levels from the Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised (BTR). BTR consists of LOTS (C1-C3) and HOTS (C4-C6) levels. This research included descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 19 prospective teacher students, namely the mathematics education department in the Mathematics Learning Evaluation course. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that prospective teacher students made mistakes at both levels but more at the HOTS level. At the LOTS level, it is on the error level C3; at the HOTS level, it is spread at all levels, namely C4-C6. An indication of error that often arises is that prospective teacher students cannot compile questions according to their level of cognition. The questions made are often still below the level they should be. The level of the questions made is still below the level that it should be.
References
Asri, A., Sukmawati, S., Wahyuddin, W., 2022. PENGEMBANGAN TES SUBJEKTIF BERBASIS HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL (HOTS) PADA MATERI POLA BILANGAN. SIGMA: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA 14. https://doi.org/10.26618/sigma.v14i2.9323
Badjeber, R., 2022. ANALISIS PROCEDURAL FLUENCY MATEMATIS MAHASISWA PADA MATERI BILANGAN. Koordinat Jurnal MIPA 3. https://doi.org/10.24239/koordinat.v3i2.47
Bodger, O., 2023. Statistics Without Maths: Using Random Sampling to Teach Hypothesis Testing, in: Teaching Biostatistics in Medicine and Allied Health Sciences. pp. 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26010-0_7
Caemmerer, J.M., Reynolds, M.R., Keith, T.Z., 2023. Beyond individual tests: Youth’s cognitive abilities on their math and writing skills. Learn Individ Differ 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102271
Destiniar, D., Mulbasari, A.S., Fuadiah, N.F., Octaria, D., Ningsih, Y.L., Retta, A.M., Isroqmi, A., 2020. Pelatihan Penyusunan Soal HOTS untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pedagogik Guru. J-ABDIPAMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) 4. https://doi.org/10.30734/j-abdipamas.v4i1.585
Ersozlu, Z., Blake, D., Usak, M., Hawken, S., 2022. Addressing Preservice Teacher’s Reasons for Mathematics and Test Anxiety. European Journal of Educational Research 11, 1715–1728. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1715
Evendi, E., Verawati, N.N.S.P., 2021. Evaluation of Student Learning Outcomes in Problem-Based Learning: Study of Its Implementation and Reflection of Successful Factors. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA 7. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1099
Febrilia, B.R.A., 2019. Profil Kemampuan Guru dalam Merancang Soal/Permasalahan Matematika Ditinjau dari Taksonomi Bloom. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia) 4. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i2.859
Gliksman, Y., Berebbi, S., Hershman, R., Henik, A., 2022. BGU-MF: Ben-Gurion University Math Fluency test. Appl Cogn Psychol 36, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3918
Hadiati, S., Sukadi, E., Pramuda, A., 2021. Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment Refer the Theory of Bloom in Laboratory Work. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan 13. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1075
Hadzhikolev, E., Hadzhikoleva, S., Yotov, K., Borisova, M., 2022. Automated Assessment of Lower and Higher-Order Thinking Skills Using Artificial Intelligence Methods, in: Communications in Computer and Information Science. pp. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04206-5_2
Harianda, B., Junedi, B., 2021. Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran missouri mathematic project. Journal of Didactic Mathematics 2. https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v2i1.616
Kang, K., 2023. Comparison of Achievement Standards in Physic of 2015 and 2022 Revised Curriculum - Based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New Physics: Sae Mulli 73, 941–948. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.73.941
Kilicoglu, E., Kaplan, A., 2022. Predicting the Mathematical Abstraction Processes Using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: Secondary School 7th Graders. Athens Journal of Education 9, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.30958/AJE.9-2-4
Krathwohl, D.R., 2002. A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Larsen, T.M., Endo, B.H., Yee, A.T., Do, T., Lo, S.M., 2022. Probing Internal Assumptions of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. CBE Life Sci Educ 21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0170-CORRECTION
Lely Fitriyanti Pratiwi, 2022. ANALISIS SOAL TIPE HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) PADA MATERI FPB KELAS IV. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris 2. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v2i2.280
Listiani, W., Sulistyorini, Y., 2020. Penyusunan Tes Matematika Berbasis High Order Thinking Skills. Prosiding Seminar Nasional IKIP Budi Utomo 1. https://doi.org/10.33503/prosiding.v1i01.1106
Marhayati, M., Huda, N., 2020. Mendeteksi Pemahaman Konsep Perkalian Mahasiswa Calon Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Melalui Problem Posing. Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar 12. https://doi.org/10.18860/mad.v12i1.7864
McDonald, S., Fotakopoulou, O., 2023. Narrowing the Digital Divide in Early Maths: How Different Modes of Assessment Influence Young Children’s Mathematical Test Scores. Early Educ Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2260683
Mellawaty, M., Tamurih, T., Mufidah, Z., 2022. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Materi Fungsi Komposisi dan Invers Berbantuan Youtube di Masa Tatap Muka Terbatas. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education 7. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.5557
Mervis, J., 2022. Math professor’s trial next test of China Initiative. Science (1979) 376, 447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq7233
Muji, A.P., Gistituati, N., Bentri, A., Falma, F.O., 2021. Evaluation of the implementation of the sekolah penggerak curriculum using the context, input, process and product evaluation model in high schools. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) 7. https://doi.org/10.29210/020211231
Musdalifah, M., Syamsudduha, St., Nursalam, N., 2020. ANALISIS KUALITAS SOAL BUATAN GURU BIOLOGI DALAM KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI SISWA. Jurnal Biotek 8. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v8i1.10471
Mutmainah, M.-, 2021. Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Materi Kubus Dan Balok Siswa MTsN 1 Makassar. SUPERMAT (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika) 5. https://doi.org/10.33627/sm.v5i1.580
Novita, R., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., Putra, M., Fitra, R., 2022. Analisis Pengetahuan Konseptual dan Prosedural Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Pada Bilangan Rasional. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika) 6. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i2.7056
Pertiwi, R.I., 2020. Beban kognitif intrinsik siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal trigonometri ditinjau dari kecemasan. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika) 6. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v6i1.1739
Pratikno, Y., Hermawan, E., Arifin, A.L., 2022. Human Resource ‘Kurikulum Merdeka’ from Design to Implementation in the School: What Worked and What not in Indonesian Education. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan 7. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i1.1708
Purwasih, J.H.G., 2020. Kendala Calon Pendidik Dalam Membuat Soal Pilihan Ganda Higher Order Thinking (Hot). Jurnal Sosial Humaniora 13. https://doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v13i1.6746
Puspa, R.D., As’ari, A.R., Sukoriyanto, S., 2020. Beban Kognitif Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Berorientasi Pada Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan 5. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i12.14325
Santi, D.P.D., Praja, E.S., Setiyani, S., 2021. Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru : Membuat Soal HOTS dan Pengecoh Tipe Multiple Choice. ABDIMASKU : JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT 4. https://doi.org/10.33633/ja.v4i2.212
Silvia, N., Firman, F., Desyandri, D., 2021. Model Means Ends Analysis Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika di Kelas IV SDI Al-Azhar 32 Padang. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran 7. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202171.164
Siu, L.S., Tiong, O.C., Ismail, N., 2022. Invoking Higher Order Thinking Skills of Lower Achievers in First Derivatives with Polmind Method, in: Proceedings - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2022. pp. 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00048
Sujadi, I., Budiyono, B., Kurniawati, I., Wulandari, A.N., Andriatna, R., 2021. Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Guru Matematika Kota Surakarta dalam Menyusun Soal PISA-like. Publikasi Pendidikan 11. https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v11i2.16356
Sukardi, Wildan, Subhani, A., 2022. Experiential Learning in Entrepreneurship Teaching: An Evaluation Based on Importance Performance Analysis. International Journal of Instruction 15. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15425a
Sulaeman, A.A., 2019. STRATEGI DIKLAT PROBLEM BASED LEARNING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KREATIVITAS GURU BIOLOGI DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN ALAT PERAGA. EDUSAINS 11. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i1.8731
Sumanik, N.B., Nurvitasari, E., Siregar, L.F., 2021. ANALISIS PROFIL KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SAINS MAHASISWA CALON GURU PENDIDIKAN KIMIA. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains 12. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i1.10215
Widiana, I.W., Triyono, S., Sudirtha, I.G., Adijaya, M.A., Wulandari, I.G.A.A.M., 2023. Bloom’s revised taxonomy-oriented learning activity to improve reading interest and creative thinking skills. Cogent Education 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2221482
Wuryandani, W., Herwin, 2021. The effect of the think–pair–share model on learning outcomes of civics in elementary school students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 16. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V16I2.5640
Yilmaz, M., Jagannadha, P.K.D., Narayanun, K., Sarangi, S., Da Silva, F., Sarmiento, J., 2023. NVIDIA MATHS: Mechanism to Access Test-Data Over High-Speed Links, in: IEEE Design and Test. pp. 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MDAT.2023.3269391
