Digital Tools, Sectoral Dynamics, and Learning Intensity: An Empirical Analysis of KM Adoption Across Industries

Authors

  • Widaningsih Universitas Garut
  • Putri Ayu Lestari Universitas Sahid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/commercium.v2i1.985

Keywords:

Knowledge Management Systems, Organizational Learning, Learning Management Systems, Digital Collaboration, EPSS, Sectoral Analysis, Learning Intensity

Abstract

 This study examines how the adoption of knowledge management (KM) systems influences organizational learning (OL) outcomes across sectors. In the era of digital transformation, platforms such as Learning Management Systems (LMS), Electronic Performance Support Systems (EPSS), and collaboration tools like Microsoft Teams play a pivotal role in knowledge strategies. The study aims to assess whether the use of these systems is associated with learning intensity, measured by training hours and per-employee spending. A cross sectional analysis was conducted using secondary data from LinkedIn Learning, ATD, Microsoft, and international databases such as OECD and the European Commission. Independent variables included LMS and EPSS/KMS adoption rates, and Microsoft Teams’ user metrics. Dependent variables captured organizational learning outcomes across sectors, including healthcare, manufacturing, and services. Results indicate a positive association between the adoption of LMS and collaboration tools with increased learning intensity. Organizations with high LMS usage and digital collaboration capabilities reported greater training hours and learning investments. EPSS/KMS usage remains limited but represents untapped potential for performance aligned learning. Sectoral differences were notable, with manufacturing leading in training hours, while healthcare focused on compliance learning. Organizational size also influenced outcomes, with larger firms better equipped to support structured learning systems. The findings contribute to understanding how KM systems influence organizational learning performance and highlight the need for context specific KM strategies. Despite some limitations in data scope and causality, the study emphasizes the strategic importance of aligning KM tools with learning goals to foster adaptive, knowledge driven organizations.

References

Aviv, I., Hadar, I., & Levy, M. (2021). Knowledge Management Infrastructure Framework for Enhancing Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes. Sustainability, 13(20), 11387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011387

Bettoni, M., & Obeng, E. (2020). Alive by Meeting: A Solution to the Paradox of Meetings Based on the Pyramid of New Collaboration. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.18.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.02.006

Budrytė, M., & Vainauskienė, V. (2023). Virtual Communities of Practice as a Knowledge Sharing Tool: Recommendations for International Business. Management of Organizations Systematic Research, 89(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.2478/mosr-2023-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mosr-2023-0002

Burlea, A. Ş., & Mihai, L. (2019). An Integrated Framework on the Sustainability of SMEs. Sustainability, 11(21), 6026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216026

Chedid, M., Ana Maria de Andrade Caldeira, Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2019). Knowledge-Sharing and Collaborative Behaviour: An Empirical Study on a Portuguese Higher Education Institution. Journal of Information Science, 46(5), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519860464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519860464

Chhetri, P., Gekara, V., Manzoni, A., & Montague, A. (2018). Productivity Benefits of Employer-Sponsored Training. Education + Training, 60(9), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-02-2017-0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2017-0029

Csizmadia, T., Obermayer, N., Bogdány, E., Purnhauser, P., & Banász, Z. (2023). Examining Industry 4.0 Through the Lens of Human Resource and Knowledge Management: Implications for SMEs. Management & Marketing, 18(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0001

Deng, H., Duan, S. X., & Wibowo, S. (2022). Digital Technology Driven Knowledge Sharing for Job Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0637

Eltorki, Y., Abdallah, O., Riaz, S., Mahmoud, S., Saad, M., Ez-Eldeen, N., Ashraf, A., Al-Hamoud, E., Al‐Khuzaei, N., & Ghuloum, S. (2022). Burnout Among Pharmacy Professionals in Qatar: A Cross-Sectional Study. Plos One, 17(5), e0267438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267438

Erlangga, D., Powell‐Jackson, T., Balabanova, D., & Hanson, K. (2023). Determinants of Government Spending on Primary Healthcare: A Global Data Analysis. BMJ Global Health, 8(11), e012562. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012562

Ferreira, A. I., & Esteves, J. D. (2016). Perceptions of Time at Work. Personnel Review, 45(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2014-0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2014-0033

Ganguli, I., Rivara, F. P., & Inouye, S. K. (2022). Gender Differences in Electronic Health Record Work—Amplifying the Gender Pay and Time Gap in Medicine. Jama Network Open, 5(3), e223940. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3940

Gupta, C., Fernández-Crehuet, J. M., & Gupta, V. (2022). Measuring Impact of Cloud Computing and Knowledge Management in Software Development and Innovation. Systems, 10(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050151

Heimerl, P., Haid, M., Benedikt, L., & Scholl‐Grissemann, U. (2020). Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in Hospitality Industry. Sage Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982998

Khumalo, S., & Mearns, M. (2019). SharePoint as Enabler for Collaboration and Efficient Project Knowledge Sharing. Sa Journal of Information Management, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.1044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v21i1.1044

Kim, E., & Park, S. (2020). Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Climate and Learning: An Empirical Study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-12-2018-0455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2018-0455

Leeuwen, L. M. v., Goderie, T., Wier, M. F. v., Lissenberg‐Witte, B. I., Lemke, U., & Kramer, S. E. (2021). Uptake of Hearing Aids and Hearing Assistive Technology in a Working Population: Longitudinal Analyses of the Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing. Ear & Hearing, 42(4), 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000983

Madhavan, V., Venugopalan, M., Gupta, B., & Sisodia, G. S. (2023). Addressing Agency Problem in Employee Training: The Role of Goal Congruence. Sustainability, 15(4), 3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043745

Martins, L., Paiva, J. R., Alexandre Coutinho Teixeira de Freitas, Miguel, L. B., & Maia, F. C. (2018). Prevalence of Pain and Psychological Distress in High‐Performance Swimmers: Job Stress and Associated Factors – A Cross-Sectional Study. Revista De Educação Física / Journal of Physical Education, 87(4). https://doi.org/10.37310/ref.v87i4.809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37310/ref.v87i4.809

Mattson, J. W. (2021). Relationships Between Density and Per Capita Municipal Spending in the United States. Urban Science, 5(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5030069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5030069

Nakash, M., & Bouhnik, D. (2021). Can Return on Investment in Knowledge Management Initiatives in Organizations Be Measured? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 74(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-09-2021-0268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2021-0268

Osterman, P. (2021). How American Adults Obtain Work Skills: Results of a New National Survey. Ilr Review, 75(3), 578–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211018191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211018191

S. M. F. D. Syed Mustapha, Evangelista, E., & Marir, F. (2023). Towards Designing a Knowledge Sharing System for Higher Learning Institutions in the UAE Based on the Social Feature Framework. Sustainability, 15(22), 15990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215990

Saini, M., Arif, M., & Kulonda, D. J. (2019). Challenges to Transferring and Sharing of Tacit Knowledge Within a Construction Supply Chain. Construction Innovation, 19(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-03-2018-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2018-0015

Staff, J., Freelin, B. N., & Mortimer, J. T. (2023). Consequences of Adolescent Employment for Young Adult Development. 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000298-018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000298-018

Suryadi, N., Anggraeni, R., Ariyanto, D., & Islam, M. F. (2022). The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Consumer Behaviors: A Study on Gen-Z in Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 10(8), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i8.1490

Tabassum, S., Alam, S., Akter, Most. S., & Ahmad, S. (2023). Factors Influencing Employee Satisfaction in Workplace. Ijeast, 8(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2023.v07i12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33564/IJEAST.2023.v07i12.010

Torre, C., Tommasetti, A., & Maione, G. (2020). Technology Usage, Intellectual Capital, Firm Performance and Employee Satisfaction: The Accountants’ Idea. The TQM Journal, 33(3), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-04-2020-0070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0070

Tsai, J. C., & Hung, S. (2016). Determinants of Knowledge Management System Adoption in Health Care. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(3), 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2016.1194062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2016.1194062

TSIMBA, J. C. (2017). Human Resource Factors Influencing Competence of Education Workforce in Public Institutions in Kinango Sub County. Strategicjournals.Com, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v4i3.529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v4i3.529

Wahl, L., & Kitchel, A. (2016). Internet Based Collaboration Tools. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 12(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2016010103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2016010103

Yang, H., Chen, W., Li, X., Yang, M., Luan, L., & Zhang, X. (2023). Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Severity of Suicidal Ideation Among Chinese Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3239115/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3239115/v1

Yuan, X., Olfman, L., & Yi, J. (2016). How Do Institution-Based Trust and Interpersonal Trust Affect Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing? Information Resources Management Journal, 29(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2016010102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.2016010102

Zapata-Cantú, L., Ibarra, G., & Blancher, P.-H. (2023). Engaging New Ways of Work: The relevance of Flexibility and Digital Tools in a Post-Covid-19 Era. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-04-2022-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-04-2022-0079

Zhang, X. (2017). Knowledge Management System Use and Job Performance: A Multilevel Contingency Model. Mis Quarterly, 41(3), 811–840. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.3.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.3.07

Zolg, S., Heiden, B., & Herbig, B. (2021). Digitally Connected Work and Its Consequences for Strain – A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Widaningsih, & Lestari, P. A. (2024). Digital Tools, Sectoral Dynamics, and Learning Intensity: An Empirical Analysis of KM Adoption Across Industries. Commercium : Journal of Business and Management, 2(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.61978/commercium.v2i1.985