The ACDAL Framework for Parents’ Customer Journey in School Choice through Social Media Content
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/commercium.v4i1.1093Keywords:
ACDAL Framework, Customer Journey, Parental Engagement, School Choice, Social Media ContentAbstract
The growing role of digital platforms in educational marketing has transformed how parents engage with schools before making enrollment decisions. Previous studies have examined social media as a tool for branding and communication, yet few have explored its function as structured touchpoints within the customer journey of parents. This study introduces the ACDAL framework (Awareness, Consideration, Decision, Action, and Loyalty) to map parental engagement across different stages of school choice. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected from seven parents and documentation of Facebook and Instagram content published by a private junior high school in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia. Data were analyzed through content analysis to identify patterns of interaction between parents and school-generated content. The findings suggest that awareness is primarily stimulated by academic achievements and visually appealing content; consideration emerges through testimonials and program highlights; decision-making is influenced by responsive communication and transparent information; action is reflected in online and offline enrollment; and loyalty is strengthened by continuous publication of student activities and achievements. These results indicate that social media content functions as critical digital touchpoints along the parental customer journey. The study contributes to the literature by extending the customer journey model to educational settings using ACDAL and offers practical insights for schools seeking to design effective social media strategies to attract and retain parental trust.
References
APPJII. (2022). Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association (APJII. APJII.
Bosetti, L. (2004). Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227465
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
Constantinides, E., & Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573593
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.).
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529622737
Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Liu-Thompkins, Y., & Wiertz, C. (2013). Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.004
Haywood, J., & Macleod, H. (2014). Social media and student decision making. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 2(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v2i2.113
Heinonen, K., & Medberg, G. (2018). Netnography as a tool for understanding customers. Qualitative Market Research, 21(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-09-2016-0092
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2020). The motivation to work. Routledge.
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2015). University choice: What do we know, what don’t we know, and what do we still need to find out? International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2013-0150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2013-0150
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001430-2
Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management (4th ed.). Pearson.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research, 8(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592454
Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment, and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610683711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610683711
Maringe, F., & Gibbs, P. (2009). Marketing higher education: Theory and practice. McGraw-Hill Education.
Ministry of Education and Culture Indonesia. (2021). Annual report on education statistics. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Naidoo, R., & Wu, T. (2021). Digital transformation and educational marketing: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5827–5852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-1
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
Lim, C., & Richardson, J. (2020). Digital trust and parental decision-making in school choice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1638–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12965
Nierenberg, B., Alexakis, G., & Preziosi, R. C. (2017). Workplace happiness: An empirical study on well-being and its relationship with organizational culture, leadership, and job satisfaction. International Leadership Journal, 9(3), 2–23.
OECD. (2020). Education in the digital age: Healthy and happy children. OECD Publishing.
Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., & Priester, J. R. (2006). Beyond attitudes: Attachment and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_2
Pintea, M. O., & Băcilă, M. F. (2020). Social media marketing strategies for educational services. Management & Marketing, 15(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0005
Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002133
Statista. (2023). Social media penetration rate in Indonesia. https://www.statista.com/statistics/
Tuten, T. L., & Solomon, M. R. (2021). Social media marketing (4th ed.).
UNESCO. (2019). Global education monitoring report 2019: Migration, displacement and education. UNESCO Publishing.
Voorveld, H. A. M., Noort, G., Muntinga, D. G., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754
Wei, X., Zhou, J., & Wang, D. (2022). Parental involvement and student outcomes: A systematic review. Educational Review, 74(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1726080
Witte, J. F. (2000). The market approach to education: An analysis of America’s first voucher program. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823314
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
