Understanding Moral Psychology in Context: Emotions, Reasoning, and Social Norms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/psychosocia.v2i4.785Keywords:
Moral Psychology, Prosocial Behavior, Empathy and Emotion, Moral Reasoning, Cultural Context, Social Norms, Moral EducationAbstract
This narrative review explores the psychological foundations of moral decision-making and prosocial behavior by examining the roles of emotion, reasoning, and contextual factors. The objective is to synthesize recent empirical findings to understand how these dimensions interact to influence moral actions. A systematic literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, with keywords including "moral psychology," "prosocial behavior," and "emotional influences on moral reasoning." Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles that utilized quantitative, qualitative, or review methodologies and addressed diverse populations across cultures. The results revealed that emotions, particularly empathy and compassion, significantly drive prosocial tendencies, and can be enhanced through interventions like loving-kindness meditation. Moral reasoning is shaped by developmental stages, cultural background, and educational exposure, with deontological and utilitarian frameworks often guiding decisions. Social context, including group identity and societal norms, further modulates moral choices, especially during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings align with established theories, including Kohlberg’s moral development stages and contextualist moral models, and highlight the systemic role of education and policy in shaping moral behavior. The review concludes by emphasizing the importance of integrating moral education, promoting emotional development, and implementing inclusive policies to foster prosocial behavior. Future research should prioritize longitudinal and cross-cultural studies to bridge current gaps in understanding the dynamics of moral psychology.
References
Arfer, K., Bixter, M., & Luhmann, C. (2015). Reputational concerns, not altruism, motivate restraint when gambling with other people's money. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00848
Bankard, J. (2015). Training emotion cultivates morality: how loving-kindness meditation hones compassion and increases prosocial behavior. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(6), 2324-2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9999-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9999-8
Barisnikov, K., & Lejeune, F. (2018). Social knowledge and social reasoning abilities in a neurotypical population and in children with down syndrome. Plos One, 13(7), e0200932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200932
Brown, M., & Sacco, D. (2017). Is pulling the lever sexy? Deontology as a downstream cue to long-term mate quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517749331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517749331
Buss, M., & Kearney, E. (2024). For the greater good: when visionary leadership fosters follower moral elevation and unethical prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 55(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13074
Clark, C., Luguri, J., Ditto, P., Knobe, J., Shariff, A., & Baumeister, R. (2014). Free to punish: a motivated account of free will belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035880
Decety, J. (2021). Why empathy is not a reliable source of information in moral decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(5), 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211031943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211031943
Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Sulik, M., & Liew, J. (2014). The development of prosocial moral reasoning and a prosocial orientation in young adulthood: concurrent and longitudinal correlates. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032990
Heyman, G., Barner, D., Heumann, J., & Schenck, L. (2013). Children's sensitivity to ulterior motives when evaluating prosocial behavior. Cognitive Science, 38(4), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12089
Holvoet, C., Scola, C., Arciszewski, T., & Picard, D. (2016). Infants’ preference for prosocial behaviors: a literature review. Infant Behavior and Development, 45, 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.10.008
Krettenauer, T., & Jia, F. (2013). Investigating the actor effect in moral emotion expectancies across cultures: a comparison of Chinese and Canadian adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12012
Niemi, L., Kniffin, K., & Doris, J. (2021). It's not the flu: popular perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 in the U.S. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668518
Perera, P., Canic, E., & Ludvig, E. (2015). Cruel to be kind but not cruel for cash: harm aversion in the dictator game. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 893-898. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0959-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0959-4
Sommerville, J., & Enright, E. (2018). The origins of infants’ fairness concerns and links to prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 117-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.005
Yao, Z., & Yu, R. (2016). The spreading of social energy: how exposure to positive and negative social news affects behavior. Plos One, 11(6), e0156062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156062
