Institutional and Market Forces in Wage Inequality: A Narrative Review

Authors

  • Hedi Cupiadi Universitas Garut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/moneta.v3i1.891

Keywords:

Wage Inequality, Labor Market Policy, Informal Employment, Gender Bias, Education and Skills, Migration and Wages, Institutional Reform

Abstract

This study conducts a narrative review to investigate the interplay of institutional and market forces shaping wage inequality in contemporary labor markets. The primary objective is to assess how educational background, gender, informal employment, migration, and labor market regulations contribute to wage disparities across different socioeconomic contexts. A comprehensive literature analysis was employed, reviewing peer-reviewed articles, cross-national studies, and policy documents sourced from major academic databases. The review identifies formal education as a fundamental determinant of upward wage mobility, while acknowledging the growing relevance of non-formal skills in bridging employment gaps. Gender bias continues to influence wage distribution, sustained by institutional inertia and underdeveloped enforcement mechanisms. Informal sector employment and migrant labor status remain critical barriers to equitable wages, largely due to the absence of legal safeguards and systemic exclusion from labor protections. Labor market policies—particularly minimum wage enforcement and social protection mechanisms—have shown varying degrees of effectiveness. Their success is highly contingent on implementation quality and institutional robustness. Interactions between market dynamics and institutional frameworks are pivotal in shaping labor outcomes. The review highlights the need for integrated policy approaches that combine education reform, labor protections, and inclusive economic planning to address the structural roots of wage inequality. Further interdisciplinary research is necessary to inform context-sensitive, long-term solutions.

References

Bai, Z. and Wallbaum, K. (2020). Optimizing pension outcomes using target‐driven investment strategies: evidence from three asian countries with the highest old‐age dependency ratio*. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 49(4), 652-682. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12310

Balcılar, M., Demirer, R., Hammoudeh, S., & Nguyen, D. (2016). Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk. Energy Economics, 54, 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.003

Bruzgė, R., Černevičienė, J., Šapkauskienė, A., Mačerinskienė, A., Masteika, S., & Driaunys, K. (2023). Stylized facts, volatility dynamics and risk measures of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 24(3), 527-550. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2023.19118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2023.19118

Chaiyarit, Y. and Phuensane, P. (2024). Comparative analysis of cryptocurrency portfolio strategies integrating esg criteria across market conditions and time periods. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(9), e07336. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n9-112

Friederich, F., Meyer, J., Matute, J., & Palau‐Saumell, R. (2023). Crypto‐mania: how fear‐of‐missing‐out drives consumers’ (risky) investment decisions. Psychology and Marketing, 41(1), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21906

Jackson, C. (2013). Diversification of portfolio risk: reconciling theory and observed weightings. Journal of Property Research, 30(4), 266-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2013.813578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2013.813578

Kang, J. and Leung, T. (2017). Asynchronous adrs: overnight vs intraday returns and trading strategies. Studies in Economics and Finance, 34(4), 580-596. https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-10-2016-0254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-10-2016-0254

Li, A. and Bastos, G. (2020). Stock market forecasting using deep learning and technical analysis: a systematic review. IEEE Access, 8, 185232-185242. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3030226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030226

Li, Y., Jiang, S., Li, X., & Wang, S. (2022). Hybrid data decomposition-based deep learning for bitcoin prediction and algorithm trading. Financial Innovation, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00336-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00336-7

Lu, R., Hoang, V., & Wong, W. (2020). Do lump-sum investing strategies really outperform dollar-cost averaging strategies?. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(3), 675-691. https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-04-2018-0107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-04-2018-0107

Mekkaoui, N. and Bravo, J. (2021). Drawing down retirement financial savings: a welfare analysis using french data. ACM International Conference Proceedings, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3466029.3466041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3466029.3466041

Mobin, M., Hassan, M., Khalid, A., & Abdul‐Rahim, R. (2022). Covid-19 pandemic and risk dynamics of financial markets in g7 countries. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 461-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-09-2021-0358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2021-0358

Ofori‐Boateng, K., Ohemeng, W., Agyapong, E., & Bribinti, B. (2021). The impact of covid-19 on stock returns of listed firms on the stock market: ghana's experience. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(1), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajems-02-2021-0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-02-2021-0074

Popescu, M. and Xu, Z. (2023). Liquidity management by mutual funds. Managerial Finance, 49(12), 1886-1898. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-07-2022-0311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2022-0311

Rodionova, M., Skhvediani, A., & Kudryavtseva, T. (2022). ESG as a booster for logistics stock returns—evidence from the US stock market. Sustainability, 14(19), 12356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912356

Sahu, S., Vázquez, J., Ramírez, A., & Kim, J. (2024). Analyzing portfolio optimization in cryptocurrency markets: a comparative study of short-term investment strategies using hourly data approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030125

Stolfi, P., Bernardi, M., & Vergni, D. (2022). Robust estimation of time-dependent precision matrix with application to the cryptocurrency market. Financial Innovation, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00355-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00355-4

Suda, D. and Spiteri, L. (2019). Analysis and comparison of bitcoin and s and p 500 market features using hmms and hsmms †. Information, 10(10), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100322

Taranto, A. and Khan, S. (2020). Gambler’s ruin problem and bi-directional grid constrained trading and investment strategies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(3), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(3).2020.05

Thorsøe, M., Noe, E., Maye, D., Vigani, M., Kirwan, J., Chiswell, H., … & Loveluck, W. (2020). Responding to change: farming system resilience in a liberalized and volatile European dairy market. Land Use Policy, 99, 105029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105029

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Cupiadi, H. (2025). Institutional and Market Forces in Wage Inequality: A Narrative Review. Moneta : Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.61978/moneta.v3i1.891