Overcoming Barriers to Electric Freight Vehicle Adoption: A Narrative Review of Global Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/logistica.v2i4.1066Keywords:
Electric Freight Vehicles, Sustainable Urban Logistics, Charging Infrastructure, Policy Incentives, Global Adoption Strategies, Low Emission ZonesAbstract
The rapid growth of urban logistics has intensified concerns about sustainability, making Electric Freight Vehicles (EFVs) a critical innovation for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving urban air quality. This study aims to provide a narrative review of the factors influencing EFV adoption, with a focus on technological, economic, infrastructural, and policy dimensions. Literature was systematically retrieved from major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, using targeted keywords related to EFVs, sustainable logistics, charging infrastructure, and adoption policies. Inclusion criteria emphasized empirical studies, case analyses, and decision-making frameworks relevant to urban freight logistics. Findings reveal that technological barriers, particularly limited battery range and insufficient charging networks, remain significant impediments to EFV adoption. Economic considerations, such as high initial investment and retrofitting costs, continue to deter smaller logistics firms, although long-term savings in energy and maintenance strengthen the economic rationale. Policy measures, including subsidies, tax incentives, and Low Emission Zones, have proven effective in accelerating adoption, particularly when aligned with infrastructure development. Cross-country comparisons demonstrate uneven progress, with Norway, the Netherlands, and China leading, while many developing regions lag due to systemic and financial constraints. The discussion emphasizes the need for holistic strategies that integrate policy, infrastructure, and technological innovations. Future research should explore longitudinal policy impacts, innovative charging solutions, and behavioral aspects of adoption to inform more effective pathways toward sustainable urban logistics.
References
Accardo, A., Dotelli, G., Musa, M., & Spessa, E. (2021). Life cycle assessment of an nmc battery for application to electric light-duty commercial vehicles and comparison with a sodium-nickel-chloride battery. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1160. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031160
Ahani, P., Arantes, A., Garmanjani, R., & Melo, S. (2023). Optimizing vehicle replacement in sustainable urban freight transportation subject to presence of regulatory measures. Sustainability, 15(16), 12266. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612266
Al–Rubaye, S., Tsourdos, A., & Namuduri, K. (2023). Advanced air mobility operation and infrastructure for sustainable connected evtol vehicle. Drones, 7(5), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7050319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7050319
Amodeo, L., Lamari, D., Musolino, G., Placido, V., Polimeni, A., Praticò, M., … & Vitetta, A. (2015). An ex-ante evaluation of last-mile freight distribution services for city logistics. https://doi.org/10.2495/ut150231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/UT150231
Andaloro, L., Napoli, G., Sergi, F., Micari, S., Agnello, G., & Antonucci, V. (2015). Development of a new concept electric vehicle for last mile transportations. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 7(3), 342-348. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj7030342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj7030342
Bastida-Molina, P., Ribó-Pérez, D., Gómez‐Navarro, T., & Hurtado-Pérez, E. (2022). What is the problem? the obstacles to the electrification of urban mobility in mediterranean cities. Case study of Valencia, Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112649
Castillo, O., & Álvarez, R. (2023). Electrification of last-mile delivery: a fleet management approach with a sustainability perspective. Sustainability, 15(24), 16909. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416909
Chakravarthy, S., Kishore, A., S.P., S., & Venkadavarahan, M. (2025). Assessing urban freight tours: a machine learning and life cycle sustainability assessment approach for logistics management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 2897-2916. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4114
Deja, A., Ślączka, W., Kaup, M., Szołtysek, J., Dzhuguryan, L., & Dzhuguryan, T. (2024). Supply chain management in smart city manufacturing clusters: an alternative approach to urban freight mobility with electric vehicles. Energies, 17(21), 5284. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215284
Dimitriou, P., Nikolopoulou, A., & Gkiotsalitis, K. (2025). An exact approach for the charging station location selection problem in urban freight transport. Operational Research, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-025-00900-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-025-00900-w
Golińska-Dawson, P., & Sethanan, K. (2023). Sustainable urban freight for energy-efficient smart cities—systematic literature review. Energies, 16(6), 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062617
Goulianou, P., Regan, A., & Goodchild, A. (2024). Long-term planning for a mixed urban freight fleet with EVs and ICEVs in the USA. Sustainability, 16(8), 3144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083144
Gruber, J., Plener, M., Damer, L., & Dubernet, I. (2024). Car or cargo bike? determinants for the use of a small vehicle type in urban logistics: a stated preference survey among commercial transport operators. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2678(11), 1548-1561. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241245676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241245676
Hassouna, F. (2022). Urban freight transport electrification in Westbank, Palestine: environmental and economic benefits. Energies, 15(11), 4058. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114058
Hu, X., Chen, N., Wu, N., & Yin, B. (2021). The potential impacts of electric vehicles on urban air quality in Shanghai City. Sustainability, 13(2), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020496
Iwan, S., Nürnberg, M., Bejger, A., Kijewska, K., & Małecki, K. (2021). Unloading bays as charging stations for EFV-based urban freight delivery system—example of Szczecin. Energies, 14(18), 5677. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185677
Jurburg, D., López, A., Carli, I., Chong, M., Oliveira, L., Dablanc, L., … & Sousa, P. (2023). Understanding the challenges facing decarbonization in the e-commerce logistics sector in Latin America. Sustainability, 15(22), 15718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215718
Kin, B., Hopman, M., & Quak, H. (2021). Different charging strategies for electric vehicle fleets in urban freight transport. Sustainability, 13(23), 13080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313080
Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., Mierlo, J., & Maes, G. (2013). Implementing electric vehicles in urban distribution: a discrete event simulation. https://doi.org/10.1109/evs.2013.6914770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EVS.2013.6914770
Macharis, C., Lebeau, P., Mierlo, J., & Lebeau, K. (2013). Electric versus conventional vehicles for logistics: a total cost of ownership. https://doi.org/10.1109/evs.2013.6914980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EVS.2013.6914980
Morganti, E., & Browne, M. (2018). Technical and operational obstacles to the adoption of electric vans in France and the UK: an operator perspective. Transport Policy, 63, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.010
Murareţu, I., & Bădică, C. (2024). Optimal agent-based pickup and delivery with time windows and electric vehicles. Applied Sciences, 14(17), 7528. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177528
Nicolaides, D., Cebon, D., & Miles, J. (2019). An urban charging infrastructure for electric road freight operations: a case study for Cambridge UK. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(2), 2057-2068. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsyst.2018.2864693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2018.2864693
Paddeu, D., Parkhurst, G., Fancello, G., Fadda, P., & Ricci, M. (2018). Multi-stakeholder collaboration in urban freight consolidation schemes: drivers and barriers to implementation. Transport, 33(4), 913-929. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6593
Pelletier, S., Jabali, O., & Laporte, G. (2018). Charge scheduling for electric freight vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 115, 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.07.010
Pietrzak, K., Pietrzak, O., & Montwiłł, A. (2021). Effects of incorporating rail transport into a zero-emission urban deliveries system: application of light freight railway (LFR) electric trains. Energies, 14(20), 6809. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206809 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206809
Pilati, F., Zennaro, I., Battini, D., & Persona, A. (2020). The sustainable parcel delivery (SPD) problem: economic and environmental considerations for 3PLs. IEEE Access, 8, 71880-71892. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2987380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987380
Qiao, Y., & Raufer, R. (2022). Electric truck deployment in Chinese cities: promotion policies and implications for future policymaking. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.433
Saxena, A., & Yadav, A. (2023). Adopting a multi-criteria decision-making approach to identify barriers to electrification of urban freight in India. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2678(2), 816-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231176812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231176812
Sayarshad, H., Mahmoodian, V., & Bojović, N. (2021). Dynamic inventory routing and pricing problem with a mixed fleet of electric and conventional urban freight vehicles. Sustainability, 13(12), 6703. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126703
Settey, T., Gnap, J., Beňová, D., Pavličko, M., & Blažeková, O. (2021). The growth of e-commerce due to COVID-19 and the need for urban logistics centers using electric vehicles: Bratislava case study. Sustainability, 13(10), 5357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105357
Torbatian, S., Saleh, M., Xu, J., Minet, L., Gamage, S., Yazgi, D., … & Hatzopoulou, M. (2024). Societal co-benefits of zero-emission vehicles in the freight industry. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(18), 7814-7825. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c08867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c08867
Wątróbski, J., Małecki, K., Kijewska, K., Iwan, S., Karczmarczyk, A., & Thompson, R. (2017). Multi-criteria analysis of electric vans for city logistics. Sustainability, 9(8), 1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081453
Winkler, J., Grahle, A., Syré, A., Martins-Turner, K., & Göhlich, D. (2022). Fuel cell drive for urban freight transport in comparison to diesel and battery electric drives: a case study of the food retailing industry in Berlin. European Transport Research Review, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00525-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00525-6
