Cultural Pragmatics in the Classroom: The Role of Local Markers in Indonesian EFL Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/lingua.v3i3.1008Keywords:
Pragmatic Markers, Classroom Discourse, Indonesian EFL, Bilingual Interaction, Discourse Functions, Interactional CompetenceAbstract
This study investigates the interactional functions of local pragmatic markers (PMs) in Indonesian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. While pragmatic markers such as okay and so are widely documented in global academic discourse, local markers like kan, dong, and sih remain underexplored. The objective of this research is to analyze how these culturally embedded markers support pedagogical interaction and contribute to classroom discourse management. Data were taken from transcripts of six Indonesian EFL classes. A corpus-based approach was applied using the IRF (Initiation–Response–Feedback) model and function-based coding. Marker frequency was normalized per 1,000 words and categorized by speaker role, turn position, and discourse function. To provide comparison, data from the MICASE and ELFA corpora were also analyzed. Results show that local PMs serve both textual and interpersonal functions. Teachers used kan to affirm responses, dong to encourage participation, and nah to mark procedural shifts. These markers enhanced Classroom Interactional Competence by facilitating smoother transitions, reducing student anxiety, and promoting learner engagement. Compared to MICASE and ELFA, which lack these markers, the Indonesian classrooms demonstrated a discourse style shaped by cultural values such as consensus and relational harmony. The findings highlight the pedagogical significance of integrating local pragmatic norms into EFL instruction. Recognizing and leveraging these markers can enhance communicative effectiveness and cultural inclusivity in language education. This study contributes to expanding models of pragmatic competence and affirms the importance of localized discourse analysis in multilingual educational contexts.
References
Alenazi, M. H. (2022). The Effectiveness of Using Advertisements to Enhance Pragmatic Language Skills Among EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 13(4), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.33
Cancino, M., & Diaz, G. P. (2020). Exploring the Code-Switching Behaviours of Chilean EFL High School Teachers: A Function-Focused Approach. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 22(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.81152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.81152
Chen, X., & Ren, W. (2023). Functions, Sociocultural Explanations and Conversational Influence of Discourse Markers: Focus on zenme Shuo Ne in L2 Chinese. Iral - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 1649–1677. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0230
Chou, I., Li, W., & Liu, K. (2023). Representation of Interactional Metadiscourse in Translated and Native English: A Corpus-Assisted Study. Plos One, 18(7), e0284849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284849
Fatah, Y. S., & Ibrahim, N. M. B. (2020). The Importance of Utilizing Pragmatics in EFL/ESL Context. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-22375/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-22375/v1
Gil, N. N. (2018). Reflexive Metadiscourse in a Corpus of Spanish Bachelor Dissertations in EFL. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.06.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.06.04
Ginting, S. A., & Dewi, N. R. (2023). Interactional Patterns in ESP Online Teaching Mode at the Fifth Semester of English Education Study Program of Universitas Negeri Medan. Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (Ashrej), 4(2), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.37698/ashrej.v4i2.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37698/ashrej.v4i2.174
Gómez‐Laich, M. P. (2016). Second Language Learners’ Divergence From Target Language Pragmatic Norms. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.4
Jones, C., Simpson, P., Byrne, S., Tomlinson, B., Jones, C., Iida, A., Yan, Z., McIlroy, T., Shelton-Strong, S. J., & Fogal, G. G. (2019). Literature, Spoken Language and Speaking Skills in Second Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641692
Kaderli, A., & Razı, Ö. (2023). English Preparatory School Learners’ Pragmatic Motivation in a StudyAbroad Setting. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231220010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231220010
Kessler, M., Solheim, I., & Zhao, M. (2020). Can Task‐based Language Teaching Be “Authentic” in Foreign Language Contexts? Exploring the Case of China. Tesol Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.534
Li, Y., Wang, X., & Xu, P. (2018). Chinese Text Classification Model Based on Deep Learning. Future Internet, 10(11), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10110113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10110113
Ogi, N. (2017). Involvement and Attitude in Japanese Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.272
Pranoto, B. E., & Suprayogi, S. (2021). Insights From Students’ Perspective of 9GAG Humorous Memes Used in EFL Classroom. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.011
Putri, E., Vianty, M., & Silvhiany, S. (2021). Analyzing the Initiation- Response and Feedback Patterns and Its Impact on the Interaction Between Teacher and Students in English Classroom. Indonesian Research Journal in Education |Irje|, 5(2), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i2.14631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i2.14631
Rahman, F., Yuzar, E., & Zhou, W. (2023). Developing an Online Test Battery for Testing EFL Pragmatic Competence: What Can It Tell Us? Scope Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.17418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.17418
Rustandi, A. (2017). An Analysis of Irf (Initiation-Response-Feedback) on Classroom Interaction in Efl Speaking Class. Edulite Journal of English Education Literature and Culture, 2(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.2.1.239-250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/e.2.1.239-250
Sharif, M., Yarmohammadi, L., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2017). Teaching Pragmatics in the Efl Classroom: Challenges, Lacunas, and Suggestions. Advanced Education, 4(8), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.108300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.108300
Shleykina, G. (2019). The Interlanguage Pragmatics of Greetings. Beyond Words, 7(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v7i1.1848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v7i1.1848
Soleimani, N., & Mohammadkhah, E. (2020). Meta-Discourse Markers in the Book Reviews Published in ISI and Non-Isi Journals of Applied Linguistics. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 7(1), 1807677. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1807677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1807677
Soler, E. A. (2017). Pragmatic Development During Study Abroad: An Analysis of Spanish Teenagers’ Request Strategies in English Emails. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190517000125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000125
Talebzadeh, H., & Khazraie, M. (2021). ‘Ignoring the Elephant in the Room’: (Under-)Representation of Impoliteness Phenomenon in Popular ELT Textbooks. Language Teaching Research, 28(4), 1311–1343. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211029028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211029028
Tanjung, P. A., & Ashadi, A. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Accommodating Individual Differences of Efl Students. Celtic a Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature and Linguistics, 6(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.22219/celticumm.vol6.no2.63-72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/CELTICUMM.Vol6.No2.63-72
Tseng, C.-T. H. (2016). E-Politeness: An Analysis of Taiwanese Efl Learners’ Email Discourse on Request Strategies. International Journal for 21st Century Education, 3(Special), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.21071/ij21ce.v3ispecial.5707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/ij21ce.v3iSpecial.5707
Unuabonah, F. O., & Oladipupo, R. (2020). Bilingual Pragmatic Markers in Nigerian English. World Englishes, 40(3), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12453
Vickov, G., & Jakupčević, E. (2017). Discourse Markers in Non-Native EFL Teacher Talk. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.4.5
Wolk, C., Götz, S., & Jäschke, K. (2020). Possibilities and Drawbacks of Using an Online Application for Semi-Automatic Corpus Analysis to Investigate Discourse Markers and Alternative Fluency Variables. Corpus Pragmatics, 5(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00072-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00072-x
Yu, Y., & Zeng, G. (2023). Lesser Relevance Markers in Chinese Academic Spoken English Corpus: A Cross-Disciplinary Study on Pragmatic Features. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297038
