Legal Implications and Urgency Of Changing Ordinary Delicates Into Complaint Delicates In Copyright Law Number 28 Year 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis.v2i2.206Keywords:
Copyright, Complaint offense, Legal implications, Ordinary offenseAbstract
The change of the ordinary offense to a complaint offense in Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014 has significant legal implications and emphasizes the importance of adjusting the law to protect copyright. This change reflects the need to adapt the law to current realities and demonstrates a commitment to international standards and the interests of copyright holders. However, effective enforcement of these changes faces challenges in identifying and dealing with copyright infringement, which requires collaborative efforts and continuous legal updates. This research aims to analyze the legal implications and urgency of the change from ordinary offense to complaint offense related to Copyright Law (UUHC) Number 28 of 2014. The results show that treating copyright infringement as a complaint offense (klach delict) can lead to difficulties in law enforcement and an increase in copyright infringement in Indonesia. This is because the authorities cannot take direct action unless there is a complaint first from the injured party, as a result it can have a negative impact on the creative industry and make creators less motivated. This can have a negative impact on the creative industry and make creators less motivated to create original works. In addition, the consequence could be a decrease in tax revenue received by the government.
References
Abdulkadir, M. (2013). Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Anggara, D. Y. (n.d.). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Dalam Pembuatan Karya Tulis. Fatwa Hukum, 4(4).
Aulia, & Heryanto, A. (2020). Perbandingan Delik Biasa dan Delik Aduan dalam Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta di Indonesia”.
Aulia, M. Z. (2017). Perlindungan Ekspresi Kreatif Manusia: Telaah terhadap Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisiona. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 14(3), 362–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss3.art8
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Fiantika, F. R., Wasil, M., Jumiyati, S., Honesti, L., Wahyuni, S., Mouw, E., Jonata, Mashudi, I., Hasanah, N., Maharani, A., Ambarwati, K., Noflidaputri, R., Nuryami, & Waris, L. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Yuliatri Novita, Ed.; 1st ed.). PT. GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI.
Ginarti, S. (2013). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Batik Perspektif Fiqih Muamalah. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/2475/10/09220007_Bab_3.pdf
Hidayah, K. (2017). Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Setara Press.
Hieriej, E. O. S. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Jamba, P. (2015). Analisis Penerapan Delik Aduan Dalam UU Hak Cipta Untuk Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Hak Cipta di Indonesia. Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, 2(1), 46–47.
Kelsen, H. (2018). Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara (R. Muttaqien, Ed.). Nusa Media.
Khoirunnisa, A., & Jawa, E. R. (2018). Kebijakan Pemerintah Indonesia Terhadap Membanjirnya Produk China Di Indonesia Periode Sby-Jk. Global Insight Journal, 3(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.52447/gij.v3i1.1671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52447/gij.v3i1.1671
Khoirunnisa, K., & Jubaidi, D. (2023). Exploring the Meaning of Faith and Kufr: Perspectives of Islamic Theological Schools. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.104.510
Lestari, S. N. (n.d.). Perlindungan Hak Moral Pencipta di Era Digital di Indonesia. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 4(3), 1–11.
Lutfi, M. F. R., & Sardjono, A. (2023). Kajian Hukum Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Terkait Perlindungan Hak Cipta Ceramah Agama. Technology and Economics Law Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/telj/vol2/iss2/6/%0Ahttps://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1046&context=telj
Prasetyo, T. (2014). Hukum Pidana. Raja Grafindo.
Pratiwi Rasyid, F. (2020). Kajian Relevansi Delik Aduan Pada Implementasi Undang-Undang. . . Mimbar Hukum, 32(mor 2), 216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.51060
Purba, A. Z. U. (2016). Perjanjian dan Beberapa Isu Strategis (2nd ed.). Alumni).
Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahman, A. (2021). Konfigurasi Politik dan karakter Hukum.
RI, K. S. N. (2014). UU No. 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.
Riswandi, B. A. (2009). Permasalahan Pelanggaran Dan Langkah Hukum Hak Cipta Atas Musik Dan Lagu Yang Dituangkan Dalam Bentuk Vcd Dan Dvd. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(4), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss4.art8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss4.art8
Roisah, K. (2015). Konsep Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI. Setara Press.
Salim, d E. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada penelitian Tesis dan Disertasiakarta: PT Raja Graindo Persada. PT Raja Graindo Persada.
Shidarta. (2019). Mengungkit Kembali Konsep Dasar “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” https://bussiness-law.binus.
Tanu Atmadja, H. (2013). Hak Cipta-Musik atau Lagu. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Usman, R. (2013). Hukum Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia. Alumni.
Widyaningrum, T., & Islamiati, D. (2020). Perlindungan Terhadap Konsumen Dari Peredaran Obat Palsu Yang diedarkan Secara Online. Jurnal Hukum Unissula Jurnal, 36(48), 59–72. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/11391/4439-indonesia/
Yahya, A. (2023). Pendekatan Restoratif Justice Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Juristic, 4(01), 29. https://doi.org/10.56444/jrs.v4i1.3904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56444/jrs.v4i1.3904
