Digital Innovation, Indigenous Knowledge, and Sustainable Cultural Policy

Authors

  • M. Arief Nazaruddin Universitas Brawijaya
  • Wuri Cahya Handaru Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/harmonia.v2i3.901

Keywords:

Arts Management, Cultural Policy, Sustainability, Cultural Governance, Digital Innovation, Indigenous Knowledge, Creative Industries

Abstract

This study explores sustainability in arts management and cultural policy through a comprehensive narrative review of interdisciplinary literature. The objective was to examine how sustainability is conceptualized and operationalized across global contexts, with particular attention to governance structures, institutional practices, digital innovation, and indigenous knowledge. Methodologically, the review employed targeted searches in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using key terms such as “cultural policy,” “arts management,” “sustainability,” and “cultural governance.” Inclusion criteria prioritized peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025 that engaged directly with sustainability in cultural sectors. Selected works were analyzed through narrative synthesis to identify recurring themes and divergent findings. The results reveal four key dimensions of sustainability in cultural policy. First, global trends show that sustainability principles are increasingly embedded in cultural strategies, though implementation varies between developed and developing countries. Second, institutional practices highlight the importance of autonomy, adaptability, and innovative funding models such as crowdfunding. Third, digital transformation emerges as a powerful tool for enhancing access, participation, and heritage preservation. Fourth, indigenous and local knowledge provide culturally grounded frameworks that enrich policy inclusivity and effectiveness. These findings indicate that sustainable cultural governance requires balancing economic viability with cultural authenticity and social justice. The implications emphasize the need for adaptive policies, interdisciplinary approaches, and expanded geographical research. Strengthening political commitment, fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration, and recognizing cultural diversity are essential strategies to overcome systemic barriers. This review contributes to advancing the global dialogue on sustainable cultural governance and highlights pathways for research and practice to ensure the resilience of arts and cultural sectors.

References

Abdullah, A., Khadaroo, I., & Napier, C. (2018). Managing the performance of arts organisations: Pursuing heterogeneous objectives in an era of austerity. The British Accounting Review, 50(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.10.001

Alexander, V. (2017). Heteronomy in the arts field: State funding and British arts organizations. British Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12283

Bo, Z., Tian, S., & Wang, C. (2021). Improving the sustainability effectiveness of traditional arts and crafts using supply–demand and ordered logistic regression techniques in Taiyuan, China. Sustainability, 13(21), 11725. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111725

Chiware, T., Vermeulen, N., Blondeel, K., Farquharson, R., Kiarie, J., Lundin, K., … & Toskin, I. (2020). IVF and other ART in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic landscape analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 27(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa047

Conte, K., & Davidson, S. (2020). Using a ‘rich picture’ to facilitate systems thinking in research coproduction. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0514-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0514-2

Dastgerdi, A., Luca, G., & Francini, C. (2020). Reforming housing policies for the sustainability of historic cities in the post-COVID time: Insights from the Atlas World Heritage. Sustainability, 13(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010174

Djuwendah, E., Karyani, T., Wulandari, E., & Pradono, P. (2023). Community-based agro-ecotourism sustainability in West Java, Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(13), 10432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310432

Donelli, C., Mozzoni, I., Badia, F., & Fanelli, S. (2022). Financing sustainability in the arts sector: The case of the Art Bonus public crowdfunding campaign in Italy. Sustainability, 14(3), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031641

Elmahdy, Y., Orams, M., Flucke, G., & Schänzel, H. (2025). Indigenous communities and marine mammal tourism management: Incorporating the perspectives of the indigenous Māori people of Aotearoa/New Zealand. Frontiers in Sustainable Tourism, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsut.2025.1510025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsut.2025.1510025

Folorunso, C. (2021). Globalization, cultural heritage management and the sustainable development goals in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Nigeria. Heritage, 4(3), 1703–1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030094 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030094

Haigh, M. (2020). Cultural tourism policy in developing regions: The case of Sarawak, Malaysia. Tourism Management, 81, 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104166

Horrillo, M., & Navarrete, L. (2020). Evaluation model of the roles of festivals in the internationalization of performing arts: Evidence from flamenco festivals. Sustainability, 12(24), 10405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410405

Luca, G., Dastgerdi, A., Francini, C., & Liberatore, G. (2020). Sustainable cultural heritage planning and management of overtourism in art cities: Lessons from Atlas World Heritage. Sustainability, 12(9), 3929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093929

Magio, K., Aranda, L., González, L., & Alpuche, C. (2021). Analysis and identification of sustainable public policy for management of cultural and natural heritage in the Maya region in line with the sustainable development goals. Heritage, 4(4), 4172–4183. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040229

Palumbo, R., Manna, R., & Cavallone, M. (2021). The managerialization of museums and art institutions: Perspectives from an empirical analysis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(6), 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2020-2438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-10-2020-2438

Prieto, A., Macías-Bernal, J., Silva, A., & Ortiz, P. (2019). Fuzzy decision-support system for safeguarding tangible and intangible cultural heritage. Sustainability, 11(14), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143953

Rius-Ulldemolins, J., & Klein, R. (2020). From artistic direction to cultural management: Governance and management of Barcelona's artistic institutions in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-03-2020-0082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2020-0082

Wyszomirski, M., & Chang, W. (2017). Professional self-structuration in the arts: Sustaining creative careers in the 21st century. Sustainability, 9(6), 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061035

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Nazaruddin, M. A., & Handaru, W. C. (2024). Digital Innovation, Indigenous Knowledge, and Sustainable Cultural Policy. Harmonia : Journal of Music and Arts, 2(3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.61978/harmonia.v2i3.901

Issue

Section

Articles