Visual Semiotics of Mural Art in Yogyakarta: Negotiating Cultural Identity in Urban Spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/harmonia.v2i1.669Keywords:
Mural Art, Local Identity, Yogyakarta, Visual Semiotics, Urban Community, Cultural Resistance, Hybrid AestheticsAbstract
This research investigates how local identity is represented in mural artworks created by urban communities in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Using a qualitative case study methodology, the study examines murals from three locations Kampung Code, Jl. Tirtodipuran, and Sayidan employing visual semiotics and thematic analysis. Findings reveal that these murals utilize traditional symbols such as wayang, batik patterns, and agrarian motifs to assert cultural continuity and communal values. The murals in Kampung Code emphasize resistance through traditional iconography, while those in Jl. Tirtodipuran depict everyday rural life, reinforcing social bonds. In Sayidan, a hybrid aesthetic emerges as young artists integrate traditional elements with contemporary street art, expressing fluid and pluralistic urban identities. The research illustrates that murals in Yogyakarta are not merely decorative but serve as powerful mediums for cultural negotiation, identity formation, and community engagement. Through public art, communities assert their presence and preserve their heritage in the face of urban change. The study contributes to interdisciplinary discussions in urban studies, visual culture, and cultural geography by offering empirical evidence on how community-based murals articulate identity, resist gentrification, and sustain cultural heritage in Yogyakarta’s evolving urban landscape.
References
Gesare D. The Role of Public Art in Community Identity and Urban Development. Ijars. 2024;3(4):14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2068
Gaha IS, Zorgati IBY, Lafhaj Z. Integrating Dynamic Culture and Participatory Design in Urban Spaces for Sustainable Futures. J Contemp Urban Aff. 2024;8(1):212–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n1-12
Napawan NC, Snyder B. #FOGWASTE: Urbanismo Participativo Para Uma Melhor Compreensão Do Contexto. Strateg Des Res J. 2016;9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.02
Chinedu E. The Influence of Public Art on Urban Revitalization. Ijars. 2024;3(4):1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2067
Delgado B, Escortell R, Martínez-Monteagudo MC, Ferrer AF, Sanmartín R. Cyberbullying, Self-Concept and Academic Goals in Childhood. Span J Psychol. 2019;22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.46
García SBR, Reyes-Schade E. A Los Ojos De Santa Lucía: Arte Urbano Y Organización Comunitaria en El Centro Histórico De San Salvador . Arquit Sur. 2023;41(63):70–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22320/07196466.2023.41.063.04
Polci V, Pierantoni I. Innovating the Local Plan Through Co-Creation and the Public Sociology Approach Toward Urban Regeneration: An Italian Case Study. Sustainability. 2024;16(8):3160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083160
Sarbu MA, Tomiuc A, Iliescu AA. The Museum as a Catalyst of Community. Case Study: The Exhibition Imagining Futures: Urban Comics From Artivistory Collective at the Art Museum in Cluj-Napoca. Stud Univ Babeș-Bolyai Hist Artium. 2023;115–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/subbhistart.2023.05
Xu J, Ker M, Mashair Sir El Khatim Mustafa. Endowed With Positive Values and Fatal Weaknesses: Public Art Practices in Post-Industrial Landscape --- A Systematic Review. Environ Soc Psychol. 2024;9(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i10.3092
Barthes R. Image–Music–Text. New York: Hill and Wang; 1977.
Hall S. The Work of Representation. In: Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. London: Sage; 1997. p. 13–58.
Lefebvre H. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991.
Geekiyanage D, Fernando T, Keraminiyage K. Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168992
Malchykova D. Participatory Budgeting Practices and Civic Activism for Urban Space Renovation: the Case of Kherson. Ekon Ta Sotsialna Geogr. 2021;(85):38–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-7154/2021.85.38-48
Batu B. Core Topics of Visual Culture Studies and Utilizing Semiotic Method. Idil J Art Lang. 2016;5(21):297–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7816/idil-05-21-02
Chen X. Exploring Just Spaces: How to Achieve the Fair Distribution of Urban Social Spaces Through Participatory Urban Planning. Ijesd. 2024;1(3):12–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/fj089r57
Andri K, Arifin RS, Ahmad O. Preservation of Local Culture Through Community Service Programs in Bukit Sangkal Village. Pengabdi J Abdimas. 2025;3(2):54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70177/abdimas.v2i4.2225
Boston D, Ross B, Weglarz P. Playful Thursday Project: Community/University Partners and Lessons Learned in a Longitudinal Study. J Community Engagem Scholarsh. 2017;10(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54656/JAES9363
Fan JR. An Exploration of a Third Participatory Museology Approach in the Interaction With Local Business and Tradition at the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Art Museums. Collect Curation. 2023;42(4):111–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-06-2022-0027
Huang P, Gao J, Cai W, Gu F. Do Professionals Really Matter? Top Executive Legal Expertise and Firm Lawsuits. Chin Manag Stud. 2023;18(4):1232–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2022-0215
Ali IZ. Public Art as a Tool for Urban Resilience Through Accelerated Social Capital; A Meta Analysis on Lyari and Madrid. 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.47472/eyW84EUD
Baek M. Revitalising Suzhou’s Water Canal Heritage: A Community-Centred Approach for Cultural Preservation and Social Sustainability. 2025;223–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4749-1_26
Güngör A. Collaboration and Visibility: Changing Relations Between Socially Engaged Art, Anthropology and Urban Sphere in Turkey. Estud Rev Cent Estud Arquit Cid E Territ Universidade Autónoma Lisb. 2019;(Quinze [Verão 2019]). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26619/2182-4339/15.3
Wallerstein N, Almeida PS d., Dickson E, Belone L, Adsul P, Jacquez B, et al. Urban Health, Social Participation, and Praxis. Arq Urb. 2023;(38):87–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37916/arq.urb.vi38.684
Carpenter J. Picture This: Exploring Photovoice as a Method to Understand Lived Experiences in Marginal Neighbourhoods. Urban Plan. 2022;7(3):351–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5451
Spencer CM, Foster A, Nguyen Q. Health literacy and behavior change: A theoretical review. Health Promot Int. 2024;39(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae130
Rich MA, Tsitsos W. Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2016;40(4):736–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12376
SUN B. Community Art as an Egalitarian Participatory Practice. 2025;
Mehan A, Dominguez N. Interdisciplinary Urban Interventions: Fostering Social Justice Through Collaborative Research-Led Design in Architectural Education. Architecture. 2024;4(4):1136–58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4040059
Bland, M., & Cho, E. (2020). The effect of physical movement on observers’ perception of musical quality in a choral performance. Psychology of Music, 49(6), 1449–1461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620959424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620959424
Bishop, L., Høffding, S., Lartillot, O., & Laeng, B. (2023). Mental effort and expressive interaction in expert and student string quartet performance. Music & Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043231208000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043231208000
Chowdhury, S., & Widmer, G. (2021). Towards explaining expressive qualities in piano recordings: Transfer of explanatory features via acoustic domain adaptation (pp. 561–565). ICASSP 2021 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9413638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9413638
Czajkowski, A., Greasley, A., & Allis, M. (2020). Mindfulness for musicians: A mixed methods study investigating the effects of 8-week mindfulness courses on music students at a leading conservatoire. Musicae Scientiae, 26(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864920941570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864920941570
Czajkowski, A., Greasley, A., & Allis, M. (2021). Mindfulness for singers: A mixed methods replication study. Music & Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043211044816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043211044816
D’Amario, S., Goebl, W., & Bishop, L. (2022). Judgment of togetherness in performances by musical duos. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 997752. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997752
Kegelaers, J., Bakker, F., Kouwenhoven, J., & Oudejans, R. (2022). “Don’t forget Shakespeare”: A qualitative pilot study into the performance evaluations of orchestra audition panelists. Psychology of Music, 51(1), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221087443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221087443
Landry, S., & Jeon, M. (2020). Interactive sonification strategies for the motion and emotion of dance performances. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 14(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-020-00321-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-020-00321-3
Meissner, H. (2021). Theoretical framework for facilitating young musicians’ learning of expressive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 584171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584171
