Author Guidelines

Harmonia : Journal of Music and Arts · Manuscript Preparation & Submission

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

Please read these guidelines carefully before submitting your manuscript. Authors are responsible for ensuring that the manuscript complies with the scientific, artistic, methodological, ethical, language, copyright, and formatting requirements of Harmonia : Journal of Music and Arts.

Journal Quick Facts

3032-4076
Online ISSN
Quarterly
Feb · May · Aug · Nov
Double-Blind
Minimum 2 Reviewers
CC BY 4.0
Open Access

Quick Submission Requirements

4,000–8,000
Manuscript Words
≤16
Title Words
4
Keywords
≥30
References

✓ Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors must confirm that their submission satisfies the journal's scientific, artistic, ethical, technical, and formatting requirements. Manuscripts that do not comply may be returned before external peer review.

✓ Originality
The manuscript is original, has not been previously published, and is not under consideration or simultaneously submitted to another journal. All listed authors have approved the submitted version.
✓ Manuscript Length
The full manuscript contains approximately 4,000–8,000 words. Manuscripts outside this range may be returned for technical revision before review.
✓ Abstract
The abstract is written in English, presented as a single paragraph, and follows the journal template by communicating the Introduction/Background, Novelty, Methods, Results, and Conclusion/Implications. References, figures, tables, and undefined abbreviations are not included.
✓ Official Template
The manuscript has been prepared using the official Harmonia submission template. Preset margins, spacing, font, font size, and automatic line numbering have not been modified.
✓ Similarity Check
The manuscript has been checked using Turnitin or equivalent software. Harmonia requires a report showing less than 20% similarity for manuscripts to proceed, with all borrowed material correctly cited and paraphrased.
✓ Rights and Permissions
Authors have obtained permission, where required, for copyrighted musical scores, photographs, artworks, illustrations, archival materials, recordings, lyrics, or other third-party content included in the manuscript or supplementary files.
✓ Ethical and Transparency Statements
Applicable statements concerning author contributions, funding, conflicts of interest, AI use, ethics approval/informed consent, and data availability are complete and accurate.
✓ Online Submission
The manuscript is submitted through the official Harmonia : Journal of Music and Arts online submission system using an active author account.

1. General Author Guidelines

  1. All contributors submitting to Harmonia : Journal of Music and Arts must comply with these Author Guidelines and the official manuscript template.
  2. The journal welcomes original research articles, critical analyses, creative works, artistic research, and case studies addressing music, visual arts, performing arts, arts education, technology, culture, heritage, management, policy, and related interdisciplinary fields.
  3. Relevant areas include music theory and composition; music performance and interpretation; music education and pedagogy; ethnomusicology and cultural studies; visual arts and design; performing arts; arts criticism and analysis; music technology and production; cultural heritage and preservation; creative practice and artistic research; history and aesthetics; arts management and policy; digital media; community engagement; and contemporary interdisciplinary arts practices.
  4. All manuscripts undergo initial editorial screening. Eligible submissions proceed to a double-blind peer-review process involving a minimum of two independent expert reviewers.
  5. Reviewers assess originality and significance, methodological or artistic rigor, relevance to the journal's scope, clarity of presentation, ethical compliance, and contribution to the field of music and arts. The final publication decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief.
  6. The manuscript must be written in English. The default language style is American English. Authors are responsible for grammar, terminology, consistency, academic readability, and accurate use of discipline-specific language.
  7. Plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, manipulated images or results, inappropriate authorship, invented citations, unauthorized reuse of artistic materials, and other breaches of publication ethics may result in rejection, correction, retraction, or further editorial action.
  8. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, scholarly integrity, interpretation, artistic documentation, citations, copyright permissions, and conclusions of the manuscript, including any content assisted by AI tools.
  9. Authors should ensure that artworks, performances, communities, cultural expressions, and participants are represented accurately, respectfully, and ethically, particularly where indigenous, traditional, sacred, vulnerable, or community-owned cultural materials are involved.
  10. Submissions outside the journal's Focus and Scope or those that materially depart from the official template may be returned or declined without external review.

2. Manuscript Format

Authors must prepare manuscripts directly using the official Harmonia submission template. Preset template formatting takes precedence over manually applied formatting.

Language English; consistent American English spelling, terminology, and punctuation
Template Official journal template is mandatory
Preset Formatting Do not alter margins, spacing, font type, font size, or other preset template settings
Line Numbering Automatic line numbering on the left margin must be retained for review and revision tracking
Main Sections Introduction; Method; Result and Discussion; Conclusion
Tables & Figures Must be clear, numbered, captioned, cited in the text, and presented according to the official template
Musical / Artistic Materials Scores, notated excerpts, artworks, photographs, screenshots, or performance documentation must be legible, properly credited, and cleared for publication where required
References APA 7th edition; reference-management software is strongly recommended
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines

3. Structure of the Manuscript

The manuscript should demonstrate a clear relationship between the research or artistic problem, novelty, theoretical or conceptual framework, method, evidence or creative material, findings, interpretation, conclusion, and contribution to music and arts scholarship or practice.

3.1 Title

The title must be concise, informative, and accurately reflect the principal focus, artistic phenomenon, context, or contribution of the manuscript.

  • Maximum length: 16 words.
  • Do not include the year of the research.
  • Avoid unnecessary terms, uncommon abbreviations, unexplained symbols, and overly broad wording.
  • Where possible, make the central musical, artistic, cultural, educational, technological, or creative focus immediately identifiable.
  • The title should support discoverability by readers and indexing systems.

3.2 Author Names and Affiliations

  • Write each author's full name without academic or professional titles.
  • List authors in the order agreed upon by all contributors.
  • Provide complete institutional affiliation, including faculty/department where applicable, institution, city/region, and country.
  • Use superscript numbers to connect authors with affiliations when required by the template.
  • Designate one corresponding author using an asterisk (*).
  • Provide a valid and actively monitored email address and correspondence details required by the template.
  • Authors are strongly encouraged to provide ORCID iDs and maintain consistent author-name metadata.

3.3 Abstract

Required Format: English • Single paragraph • IMRAD-oriented flow • No references • No figures/tables • No undefined abbreviations

The abstract must provide a concise and self-contained summary of the manuscript and follow the structure established in the journal template.

The abstract should communicate the following elements in a coherent sequence:

1 Introduction / Background: topic, essential context, importance, problem or phenomenon, and research question.
2 Novelty: what distinguishes the study or artistic inquiry from previous work and why the question remains insufficiently addressed.
3 Methods: research design, context, participants/materials, data or artistic sources, and principal analytical or creative method.
4 Results: the principal empirical, analytical, interpretive, artistic, or conceptual findings, with a brief discussion where appropriate.
5 Conclusion / Implications: the principal conclusion, contribution, and relevant scholarly, artistic, educational, cultural, technological, or policy implication.
Important: References, figures, tables, and undefined abbreviations must not be included in the abstract.

3.4 Keywords

Provide exactly four (4) keywords immediately after the abstract. Separate keywords using semicolons as required by the journal template.

Format: KEYWORDS: Keyword1; Keyword2; Keyword3; Keyword4
  • Select specific terms representing the main artistic form, concept, community, tradition, method, technology, or theoretical issue examined.
  • Prefer established disciplinary terminology that supports indexing and discoverability.
  • Avoid unnecessarily broad words that add little retrieval value.

3.5 Introduction

The Introduction should establish the scholarly or artistic context of the study and clearly explain why the research or creative inquiry is necessary.

The Introduction should normally address:

  1. the musical, artistic, cultural, educational, technological, historical, aesthetic, or practical problem and its significance;
  2. relevant theoretical, historical, empirical, or artistic context;
  3. the current state of scholarship or practice and key previous studies;
  4. the unresolved research, interpretive, methodological, or artistic gap;
  5. the novelty or distinctive contribution of the study;
  6. the research question(s), proposition(s), or artistic inquiry where relevant; and
  7. clear research objectives.
Novelty Expectation
Novelty should be stated explicitly rather than implied. Authors should explain how the manuscript extends, challenges, reframes, documents, or contributes new evidence, interpretation, artistic practice, methodological insight, or cultural understanding beyond relevant previous studies.

3.6 Method

The Method section must provide sufficient transparency for readers and reviewers to understand, assess, and where appropriate reproduce or critically evaluate the research or artistic process.

Because Harmonia publishes diverse music and arts scholarship, the Method section should be adapted to the design. It may include:

  • Research / Artistic Design — qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, ethnographic, ethnomusicological, historical, musicological, analytical, experimental, case study, practice-based/artistic research, visual analysis, performance research, digital methods, literature review, systematic review, or other appropriate design.
  • Research Context / Site — institution, community, performance setting, archive, studio, classroom, cultural environment, digital platform, or geographic context where relevant.
  • Participants, Informants, Corpus, Repertoire, Artworks, or Materials — sampling or selection criteria, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and relevant characteristics.
  • Data / Artistic Sources — interviews, observations, field recordings, performances, musical scores, compositions, visual works, archival documents, media objects, surveys, experiments, digital traces, or secondary literature.
  • Instruments and Documentation — interview protocols, observation guides, questionnaires, analytical rubrics, recording equipment, software, coding frameworks, notation systems, or production tools.
  • Procedure — data collection, fieldwork, rehearsal/performance process, compositional process, studio procedure, visual production, digitization, or review procedure.
  • Analytical / Interpretive Strategy — thematic analysis, content analysis, discourse analysis, semiotics, musical analysis, score analysis, acoustic analysis, statistical analysis, visual analysis, comparative interpretation, practice-based reflection, or another justified method.
  • Validity / Trustworthiness / Reflexivity — reliability, triangulation, member checking, inter-coder procedures, researcher positionality, reflexive documentation, or other quality-assurance measures where relevant.
  • Ethics, Consent, and Cultural Permissions — ethics approval, informed consent, permissions to record or reproduce artistic/cultural materials, and protection of participants or communities where applicable.
For artistic or practice-based research: clearly distinguish the creative process from the analytical argument and explain how artistic decisions, documentation, reflection, and outputs function as evidence within the research design.

3.7 Result and Discussion

Harmonia uses a combined Result and Discussion section. Authors should present evidence clearly and then interpret its meaning in relation to the research questions, previous scholarship, artistic practice, and broader disciplinary context.

Organize findings according to research questions, analytical themes, artistic processes, repertoire, cases, or conceptual categories.
Use appropriate evidence such as quotations, observations, musical analysis, score excerpts, performance documentation, visual materials, tables, figures, statistical results, or reflective artistic documentation.
Move beyond description by explaining the aesthetic, cultural, pedagogical, historical, technological, social, or artistic significance of the findings.
Compare findings with relevant previous studies, theories, artistic practices, or traditions and explain agreements, differences, extensions, or contradictions.
Clarify the manuscript's theoretical, methodological, empirical, artistic, educational, cultural, technological, or practical contribution.
Avoid duplicating identical information in narrative text, tables, figures, musical examples, and supplementary materials.

3.8 Conclusion

The Conclusion must answer the research objective or artistic inquiry directly and synthesize the principal contribution without merely repeating the Results and Discussion.

  • state the main conclusion in relation to the research objective or question;
  • summarize the most important findings or artistic insights;
  • explain the academic and/or artistic contribution;
  • state relevant implications for scholarship, artistic practice, education, cultural preservation, technology, policy, or community engagement;
  • acknowledge relevant limitations; and
  • identify appropriate directions for future research or creative inquiry.
Academic / Artistic Contribution
The conclusion should make explicit how the study advances knowledge or practice in music and arts—for example by extending interpretation, documenting underrepresented practices, refining theory, introducing a methodological approach, producing new artistic knowledge, or demonstrating implications for education, culture, heritage, technology, or creative practice.
Important: Do not introduce new data, new literature, or entirely new arguments in the Conclusion.

3.9 Acknowledgments

Authors may acknowledge individuals, communities, artists, performers, cultural custodians, institutions, archives, technical staff, studios, organizations, funders, or other parties that supported the research or creative process but do not meet the criteria for authorship. Permission should be obtained where acknowledgment could identify private individuals or sensitive communities.

3.10 Declarations and Research Transparency

Authors must provide applicable declarations to support transparency, accountability, and research integrity.

Author Contributions

Describe each author's contribution clearly. The CRediT taxonomy may be used where appropriate, including conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. For artistic research, relevant roles may also include composition, performance, artistic direction, production, documentation, or curatorial work.

Funding

Identify all financial support, grant numbers, sponsoring institutions, commissions, residencies, production funding, or other material support relevant to the research or creative work. If no external funding was received, state this explicitly.

Conflict of Interest

Disclose financial, institutional, personal, professional, academic, artistic, or other interests that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the work. When no conflict exists, use: “The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

Generative Artificial Intelligence Use Statement

Any permitted use of AI tools must be disclosed transparently, identifying the tool, purpose, and manuscript section(s) assisted. Authors remain fully responsible for all content. AI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

For studies involving human participants, students, performers, communities, interviews, identifiable recordings, personal data, or other activities requiring ethical oversight, state the approving institution/committee and approval number where applicable. Confirm informed consent when required. If not applicable, state this clearly.

Data Availability Statement

Every submitted manuscript must include a Data Availability Statement indicating whether research data or supporting materials are available, where they can be accessed, and under what conditions. Restrictions relating to privacy, cultural sensitivity, participant consent, copyright, community ownership, archival rules, or third-party rights must be explained.

3.11 References

References must demonstrate a strong command of relevant, credible, and up-to-date scholarship. Every in-text citation must correspond to an entry in the reference list, and every listed reference must be cited in the manuscript.

Reference Style APA 7th Edition
Minimum References At least 30 references
Journal Articles At least 80% should consist of journal articles from reputable academic journals
Recency The majority should preferably come from the past 10 years, while seminal or foundational works may be retained when academically necessary
Reference Manager Mendeley, Zotero, EndNote, or equivalent software is strongly recommended
Reference Quality: Prioritize primary peer-reviewed scholarship. Blogs, commercial websites, anonymous sources, or non-academic materials should be avoided unless they constitute necessary primary objects of analysis. Excessive self-citation and irrelevant citation padding should be avoided.

4. Tables, Figures, Musical Examples, Images, and Audiovisual Materials

Tables
Tables should present processed and summarized information rather than raw software output. Number tables consecutively, provide clear titles, define abbreviations and units, identify sources, and refer to every table in the text.
Figures and Visual Materials
Figures, photographs, artworks, diagrams, screenshots, maps, and other visual materials must be clear, relevant, publication-ready, and accompanied by appropriate captions and credits. Authors are responsible for securing reproduction permission where copyright is not owned by the authors.
Musical Examples and Scores
Musical notation must be legible at publication size. Identify work/title, composer or source, measure numbers or excerpt location where relevant, and provide copyright or edition information. Reproduction of copyrighted scores or lyrics requires permission unless legally exempt.
Audio, Video, and Performance Documentation
When audiovisual files materially support the argument, provide stable supplementary files or repository links where permitted. Clearly identify creator/performer, date, location, format, ownership, consent, and access restrictions where applicable.
Cultural and Community Materials
Materials involving indigenous, traditional, sacred, community-owned, or culturally sensitive knowledge must be handled with appropriate consent, attribution, contextualization, and respect for applicable cultural protocols and rights.

5. Generative Artificial Intelligence and AI-Assisted Technologies

Harmonia permits limited, transparent, and responsible use of AI-based tools only where they support communication quality without replacing the authors' intellectual, scholarly, or artistic contribution.

Permitted Support
Language editing, grammar and spelling correction, improving sentence clarity and readability without changing the scientific or artistic meaning, and assisting with outline organization or the logical flow of an initial draft.
Prohibited Uses
Generating substantial portions or full sections of the manuscript; generating analyses, interpretations, or conclusions; fabricating or manipulating data, results, figures, images, or tables; inventing citations or references; or submitting AI-generated content without human verification and disclosure.
Disclosure: Any AI use must identify the tool, purpose, and section(s) assisted, normally in the Acknowledgments or Methods section. Authors remain fully responsible for accuracy, originality, copyright compliance, citations, analysis, interpretation, and conclusions. AI tools cannot be authors or co-authors.

6. Data, Creative Materials, and Research Accessibility

All submitted manuscripts must include a Data Availability Statement. Authors should state whether supporting data or research materials are included in the article, deposited in a repository, available from the corresponding author, or subject to legitimate restrictions.

  • Research materials may include datasets, coding frameworks, field notes, interview materials, analytical files, scores, recordings, photographs, digital outputs, or other documentation where sharing is ethically and legally appropriate.
  • Recognized repositories such as Zenodo, Figshare, Harvard Dataverse, Dryad, Open Science Framework, or suitable institutional/disciplinary repositories are encouraged where appropriate.
  • Shared files should include sufficient metadata and documentation to support scholarly verification, reuse, or secondary analysis where possible.
  • Restrictions arising from participant privacy, performer consent, community protocols, archival conditions, copyright, cultural ownership, intellectual property, or contractual obligations must be explained clearly.
  • De-identified or aggregated data should be used where appropriate to protect participants.
  • Publicly deposited datasets or materials should be cited using a persistent identifier where available.
Open Science and Cultural Responsibility: Transparency and reproducibility are encouraged, but data openness must not override ethical duties, copyright, participant consent, cultural sensitivity, indigenous/community rights, or legitimate restrictions on artistic materials.

7. Appendices and Supplementary Materials

Appendices or supplementary materials may include interview protocols, questionnaires, extended coding frameworks, additional analytical tables, musical examples, complete repertoire lists, transcription conventions, photographs, image sets, performance documentation, audio/video files, creative-process documentation, or other materials that support the manuscript without interrupting the main narrative. All supplementary materials must be clearly labeled and referenced in the manuscript.

8. Peer Review and Revision

Initial Screening Scope, submission requirements, template compliance, originality, methodological/artistic quality, ethical suitability, and editorial relevance
Review Type Double-blind / double-anonymous
Reviewers Minimum two independent expert reviewers in music, arts, or the relevant interdisciplinary field
Typical Review Duration Approximately 3–4 weeks for reviewer evaluation
Possible Decisions Acceptance, minor revision, major revision, rejection, or resubmission as a new submission after substantial changes
Minor Revision Usually expected within approximately 3 weeks
Major Revision Usually allowed approximately 6–8 weeks
Revision Response Authors should respond carefully to reviewer comments and clearly identify substantive changes in the revised manuscript
Final Decision Rests with the Editor-in-Chief after considering the handling editor's recommendation, reviewer reports, originality, scope relevance, quality, and ethical compliance

9. Similarity and Plagiarism Screening

Harmonia uses Turnitin to evaluate manuscript similarity. A numerical similarity percentage does not replace editorial judgment; editors may examine the nature and source of overlap, citation practice, quotation, and paraphrasing.

Above 40% May lead to direct rejection because of substantial similarity, poor paraphrasing, or inappropriate quotation.
10%–40% May be returned for correction, improved citation, and appropriate paraphrasing depending on the nature of the overlap.
Required for Processing The manuscript should provide a Turnitin report showing less than 20% similarity, while ensuring all reused or quoted material is properly cited.

10. Open Access, Copyright, and Publication Charges

Harmonia is an open-access journal. Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Authors retain copyright while granting the journal a non-exclusive right to publish and disseminate the work.

Third-Party Materials: The CC BY license does not automatically apply to copyrighted third-party images, artworks, music, photographs, scores, or other materials. Authors must obtain necessary permissions and provide appropriate credit.
Article Processing Charge (effective July 2026): Accepted articles are subject to the journal's current APC policy. The journal states an APC of USD 120 for international authors and Rp 2,000,000 for Indonesian authors. There is no article submission charge. Authors should consult the current Journal Business Model page for waiver eligibility and any later updates before submission.
Before You Submit

Final Manuscript Quality Check

The title contains no more than 16 words and clearly reflects the manuscript's focus.
Author names, affiliations, correspondence information, and metadata are complete and consistent.
The abstract is a single paragraph and clearly communicates background, novelty, method, findings, and conclusion/implications.
Exactly four keywords are provided and separated by semicolons.
The official template and automatic line numbering have been retained.
The manuscript follows Introduction – Method – Result and Discussion – Conclusion.
The Method section is transparent and appropriate to the research or artistic design.
Musical examples, images, scores, figures, and audiovisual materials are clear, credited, and permission-cleared where required.
The Result and Discussion section interprets findings critically rather than merely describing them.
Applicable author contribution, funding, conflict of interest, AI, ethics/consent, and data availability statements are included.
At least 30 references are included, at least 80% are journal articles, and APA 7th edition is used consistently.
The manuscript has been proofread and a Turnitin report below 20% has been prepared.

Important Points to Remember

Clear Contribution
Scholarly or artistic contribution must be explicit.
Ethical Representation
Respect participants, performers, communities, and cultural rights.
Template Discipline
Retain preset formatting and line numbering.
Quality Scholarship
Use current, relevant, peer-reviewed references.

Related Journal Policies

Authors should consult the current journal website for the complete and most recent versions of all editorial policies:

Author Guidelines journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/aguid
Focus and Scope journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/focus
Peer Review Process journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/prp
AI Usage Policy journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/ai
Plagiarism Policy journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/pp
Data Sharing Policy journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/datasharing
Conflict of Interest journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/conflictofinterest
Journal Business Model / APC journal.idscipub.com/index.php/harmonia/jbm

Before Final Submission

Authors should carefully review the manuscript, official template, permissions for artistic materials, publication ethics, similarity report, declarations, supporting data, submission metadata, and the journal's current policies before completing submission. Compliance with these requirements will assist the Editorial Team in conducting an efficient initial screening and peer-review process.