Fiscal, Political, and Developmental Dimensions of Decentralization: Global Insights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v3i1.961Keywords:
Decentralization, Regional Autonomy, Fiscal Decentralization, Governance Reforms, Local Governance, Accountability, Socio-Economic DevelopmentAbstract
Decentralization and regional autonomy have become central themes in governance reforms worldwide, raising critical questions about their effectiveness in improving accountability, service delivery, and socio-economic outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes existing scholarship to evaluate the effectiveness of decentralization across fiscal, political, administrative, and developmental dimensions. Literature was collected from databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, using targeted keywords and applying inclusion criteria focused on relevance, methodological rigor, and empirical evidence. The review highlights three main findings. First, fiscal decentralization demonstrates potential to enhance accountability and service delivery, but its success is constrained by elite capture and dependence on central transfers. Second, political and administrative autonomy fosters policy innovation and conflict resolution when embedded in strong institutional and legal frameworks, but in weaker contexts it may aggravate corruption and inefficiency. Third, socio-economic outcomes show significant variation: while OECD and some Asian regions report improvements in education, health, and infrastructure, many African and fragile states experience uneven benefits. These findings underscore that decentralization is not a uniform process; instead, its outcomes are shaped by systemic factors such as institutional design, political culture, and legal guarantees. Effective policy interventions should strengthen local capacity, promote transparency, and establish balanced fiscal frameworks. Future research should expand to underrepresented regions and adopt longitudinal approaches to capture long-term impacts, ensuring decentralization reforms achieve sustainable governance and inclusive development.
References
Akadun, A. (2024). Analysis of pseudo-decentralization and financial dependency in the implementation of regional autonomy in Sumedang regency of Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration, 23(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.23.1.33295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.23.1.33295
Amin, R., & Isharyanto, I. (2022). Asymmetrical sequential decentralization: Resetting the paradigm of regional autonomy. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(4), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i4art3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i4art3
Aray, H. (2018). More on decentralization and economic growth. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 97(4), 971-994. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12305
Bonal, X., Pagès, M., Verger, A., & Zancajo, A. (2023). Regional policy trajectories in the Spanish education system: Different uses of relative autonomy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.8031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.8031
Calderón, R., Barbieri, N., Gispert, C., González, S., & Vilalta, M. (2018). Constraints on political autonomy in decentralized Spain? Analysing the impact of territorial financing and governments’ ideology on regional policy-making. Revista De Estudios Políticos, (180), 131-162. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.180.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.180.05
Checkland, K., Dam, R., Hammond, J., Coleman, A., Segar, J., Mays, N., … & Allen, P. (2017). Being autonomous and having space in which to act: Commissioning in the ‘new NHS’ in England. Journal of Social Policy, 47(2), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279417000587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000587
Eilenberg, M. (2017). A state of fragmentation: Enacting sovereignty and citizenship at the edge of the Indonesian state., 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119384816.ch7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119384816.ch7
Faguet, J. (2013). Can subnational autonomy strengthen democracy in Bolivia?. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 44(1), 51-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt020
Fauzan, M., Prasojo, H., Ardhanariswari, R., & Elfudllatsani, B. (2025). Balancing power and resolving conflicts in the collaboration between regional heads and DPRD in Indonesia's decentralized governance. E3S Web of Conferences, 609, 07004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560907004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560907004
Filippetti, A., & Cerulli, G. (2018). Are local public services better delivered in more autonomous regions? Evidence from European regions using a dose‐response approach. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 97(3), 801-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12283
Fiseha, A. (2020). Local level decentralization in Ethiopia: Case study of Tigray regional state. The Law and Development Review, 13(1), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2019-0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2019-0006
Hamid, Z., Rehman, K., Senkus, P., Ahmed, N., Wysokińśka-Senkus, A., & Hadryjańska, B. (2023). Environmental regulation, fiscal decentralization, and agricultural carbon intensity: A challenge to ecological sustainability policies in the United States. Sustainability, 15(6), 5145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065145
Krysovatyy, A., Desyatnyuk, O., & Tkachyk, F. (2022). Theoretical logos of fiscal decentralization in the conditions of permanent transformation of interbudgetary relations. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(43), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.2.43.2022.3630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.2.43.2022.3630
Lee, J., & Suh, J. (2021). Decentralisation and government trust in South Korea: Distinguishing local government trust from national government trust. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 8(1), 68-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.317
Mihálik, J., Horváth, P., & Švikruha, M. (2019). Give me liberty or give me money: The fiscal decentralization and autonomy of regional governance in Slovakia. European Journal of Government and Economics, 8(1), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2019.8.1.4573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2019.8.1.4573
Muhtada, D. (2017). The prospects for public management reform in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 2(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v2i02.19437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v2i02.19437
Novi, C., Piacenza, M., Robone, S., & Turati, G. (2019). Does fiscal decentralization affect regional disparities in health? Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 78, 103465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103465
Ogweno, J., & Semedo, G. (2025). Fiscal performance and intergovernmental fiscal relations in developing countries. Public Finance Review, 53(4), 468-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421241305733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421241305733
Ping, Z., Zheng, H., & Ren, Q. (2020). The impacts of fiscal decentralization on the quality of government in China: A test of market-preserving federalism at the provincial level. Chinese Public Administration Review, 11(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v11i2.281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v11i2.281
Rahim, F., & Shirazi, N. (2018). Fiscal decentralization and citizen’s satisfaction from local public service delivery in Pakistan. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(1), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-04-2017-0066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-04-2017-0066
Rijal, S., Ilmar, A., Maskun, M., & Rahman, N. (2024). Restoration of central power or betrayal of regional autonomy? Analysis of the impact of recentralization of mining authority in the era of limited autonomy. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(4), 1793-1820. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.14466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.14466
Rodríguez‐Pose, A., & Muštra, V. (2022). The economic returns of decentralisation: Government quality and the role of space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(8), 1604-1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221118913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221118913
Rompuy, P. (2020). Does subnational tax autonomy promote regional convergence? Evidence from OECD countries, 1995–2011. Regional Studies, 55(2), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1800623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1800623
Sambanis, N., & Milanović, B. (2014). Explaining regional autonomy differences in decentralized countries. Comparative Political Studies, 47(13), 1830-1855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013520524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013520524
Sumah, A., & Baatiema, L. (2018). Decentralisation and management of human resource for health in the health system of Ghana: A decision space analysis. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 8(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.88
Sukri, S., Armunanto, A., Nadir, S., & Ekawaty, D. (2019). Environmental dilemma under implementation of Indonesian regional autonomy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1), 012088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012088
Syarif, A. (2023). Fiscal decentralization and corruption: The facts of regional autonomy policies in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 27(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.69007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.69007
Tonelli, D., & Gibson, D. (2023). Financial decentralization and third-mission outputs: A comparative study of higher education contexts in Brazil and the United States. Industry and Higher Education, 38(4), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231208438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231208438
Wiryawan, B., & Otchia, C. (2022). The legacy of the reformasi: The role of local government spending on industrial development in a decentralized Indonesia. Journal of Economic Structures, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00262-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00262-y
Yang, A., Rounsevell, M., & Haggett, C. (2015). Multilevel governance, decentralization and environmental prioritization: How is it working in rural development policy in Scotland?. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(6), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1690
Yimenu, B. (2023). Measuring and explaining fiscal de/centralization: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia, 1995–2020. Public Administration and Development, 43(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2020
Zamzami, F., & Rakhman, F. (2023). Determinants of local government financial performance in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(5), 332. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0148




