AUKUS: A Manifestation of Balance of Power in the Indo-Pacific Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v2i4.406Keywords:
AUKUS, Balance of Power, Neorealism, Indo-PacificAbstract
This research analyzes Australia's foreign policy in the context of the Trilateral Security Pact AUKUS (Australia, United Kingdom, United States) as a manifestation of the concept of balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region. Announced on September 15, 2021, AUKUS is a trilateral agreement to strengthen diplomatic, defense, and security relations among the three countries, with Australia receiving three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from the United States. The Indo-Pacific, which is geographically and economically strategic, has become a focal point of global geopolitical competition, particularly with the rise of China's influence, perceived as a threat by the United States and its allies. Through AUKUS, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia seek to balance power in the region by enhancing military capabilities and defense technologies, in line with neorealist theory, which emphasizes the importance of security and power equilibrium in an anarchic international system. This study employs a descriptive qualitative methodology with secondary data analysis to understand the dynamics behind the formation of AUKUS and its implications for regional stability. The findings indicate that AUKUS is a strategic response to global and regional power balancing and reflects Australia's efforts to strengthen its position in facing security challenges posed by the rise of China.
References
Batudoka, M. D. E. (2023). -ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF THE AUKUS (AUSTRALIA, UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) DEFENSE PACT ON INDO-PACIFIC SECURITY:-. Mediasi: Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 32–48.
Boylan, B. M., McBeath, J., & Wang, B. (2021). US–China relations: Nationalism, the trade war, and COVID-19. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(1), 23–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00302-6
Buana, A. C., Riyanto, A. V., Talita, B., Margareta, S., IMBIRI, T. F. B. M., & NATASYA, Y. P. (2023). DAMPAK PAKTA AUKUS PADA KEAMANAN ASIA-PASIFIK DALAM GEOPOLITIK INDO-PASIFIK DENGAN ASIA-PASIFIK. JURNAL EKONOMI, SOSIAL & HUMANIORA, 4(05), 58–68.
Chan, S. (2013). Looking for balance: China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqsdp1m
Dolan, C. J. (2024). Perspective Chapter: AUKUS Pillar 2–Technology, Interoperability, and Advanced Capabilities in the Evolving Trilateral Security Partnership.
Donnelly, J. (2019). Systems, levels, and structural theory: Waltz’s theory is not a systemic theory (and why that matters for International Relations today). European Journal of International Relations, 25(3), 904–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118820929
Dugis, V. (2018). TEORI HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL: Perspektif-Perspektif Klasik Edisi Revisi. Airlangga University Press.
Glaser, C. L. (1997). The security dilemma revisited. World Politics, 50(1), 171–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100014763
Keohane, R. O. (2019). Sovereignty, interdependence, and international institutions. In Ideas And Ideals (pp. 91–107). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429033957-7
Kumar, S. (2024). Shifting balance of power and the formation of AUKUS in the Indo-Pacific region. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 16(4), 456–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2023.2271254
Lopez, A. C., & Johnson, D. D. P. (2020). The determinants of war in international relations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 983–997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.010
NIAZI, Z. A. (2024). Future of Maritime Security: Navigating Complex Waters in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, 7(2).
Ogunbanjo, M. A. (2021). Neo-realism and neo-liberalism in global politics: Towards assessing the intellectual siblings. NIU Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 57–76.
Powell, R. (1994). Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization, 48(2), 313–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204
Purnamasari, N. P. E. T. (2023). Pembentukan AUKUS: Solusi atau Polemik di Kawasan Indo-Pasifik? Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional LINO, 3(2), 105–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31605/lino.v3i2.2735
Quinn, R., & Gibson, B. (2017). An Analysis of Kenneth Waltz’s Theory of International Politics. Macat Library.
Sari, M. N., & Ningsih, P. E. A. (2023). An Analysis Of Students’ Anxiety In Learning English At The Eleventh Grade Of SMA Negeri 10 Kerinci. EDU RESEARCH, 4(3), 83–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47827/jer.v4i3.115
Shihundu, F. (2024). A Geo-Strategic Metaverse? Examining Security Perceptions and Narratives of the AUKUS Strategic Alliance in the Indo-Pacific Rivalry. East Asia, 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-024-09437-9
Soltani, F., Naji, S., & Amiri, R. E. (2014). Levels of analysis in international relations and regional security complex theory. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 4(4), 166–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v4i4.6973
Suparman, S. (2024). Analysis of British Foreign Policy Forming the Australia, United Kingdom, and United States (AUKUS) Security Alliance in 2021. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 3(3), 548–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i3.260
Tunsjø, Ø. (2018). The return of bipolarity in world politics: China, the United States, and geostructural realism. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/tuns17654
Türkcan, M. L. (2021). AUKUS and the Return of Balance of Power Politics. Policy Outlook, 76–89.
Utami, S. T. (2022). Keamanan Regional Asia Tenggara Pasca Perjanjian AUKUS dan Implementasinya Pada Ketahanan Wilayah Indonesia. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 28(2), 11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.75593
Walt, S. M. (2009). Alliances in a unipolar world. World Politics, 61(1), 86–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000045
Wardhani, N. F. (2021). The concept of polarity and centres of power in international relations. Jurnal Politik Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Politics), 7(2), 106–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jpi.v7i2.31126
