The Influence of Work Culture and Communication on Public Reporting Quality via Qlue in Tanjung Duren
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v2i3.511Keywords:
Work Culture, Communication, Service Reporting Quality, Qlue ApplicationAbstract
This study examines the influence of work culture and communication among public officials on the quality of public reporting services at the Head of the Subdistrict Office in Tanjung Duren, West Jakarta, with a specific focus on the implementation of the Qlue application. Using a descriptive quantitative research method, the study investigates two independent variables—work culture and communication—and their effects on the dependent variable, namely the quality of public reporting services. Data collection was carried out through a census technique involving 150 respondents. The findings show that work culture significantly influences the quality of public services, contributing 53.9% to the variance. Communication also has a significant effect, accounting for 54.5%. When both variables are combined, they explain 57.1% of the variance in the quality of public reporting services. These results indicate that improving both internal culture and communication practices among public officials can substantially enhance the effectiveness of digital public service platforms such as Qlue. The study emphasizes the importance of good leadership, effective policy implementation, and active community participation in optimizing service delivery. It is recommended that the Head of the Subdistrict Office take strategic steps to strengthen the work culture by improving officials’ attitudes, perspectives, and behaviors to maximize the potential of digital tools in public administration.
References
Bleibtreu, C., & Stefani, U. (2024). The interdependence between market structure and the quality of audited reports: the case of non-audit services. Review of Accounting Studies, 29(2), 1524–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09734-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09734-9
Chua, K.-C., Henderson, C., Grey, B., Holland, M., & Sevdalis, N. (2023). Evaluating quality improvement at scale: A pilot study on routine reporting for executive board governance in a UK National Health Service organisation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102222
Cornelissen, J. (2020). Corporate Communication A Guide to Theory & Practice. In SAGE Publications Ltd: Vol. Edition 6.
Feliren, V., Nugraha, Y., Nasution, B. I., Febria Finola, C., Kanggrawan, J. I., & Suherman, A. L. (2021). The Effect of Plastic Bag Ban Policy towards Waste Complaints in Jakarta through JAKI and Qlue. 8th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: Digital Twin for Smart Society, ICISS 2021 - Proceeding. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS53185.2021.9533236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS53185.2021.9533236
Firmansyah, M., Masrun, M., & Yudha S, I. D. K. (2021). ESENSI PERBEDAAN METODE KUALITATIF DAN KUANTITATIF. Elastisitas - Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i2.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i2.46
Frinaldi, A. (2014). PENGARUH BUDAYA KERJA PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL TERHADAP PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI DINAS CATATAN SIPIL DAN KEPENDUDUKAN KOTA PAYAKUMBUH. Humanus, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/jh.v13i2.4727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jh.v13i2.4727
Gebler, R., Lehmann, M., Löwe, M., Gruhl, M., Wolfien, M., Goldammer, M., Bathelt, F., Karschau, J., Hasselberg, A., Bierbaum, V., Lange, T., Polotzek, K., Held, H.-C., Albrecht, M., Schmitt, J., & Sedlmayr, M. (2024). Supporting regional pandemic management by enabling self-service reporting-A case report. PLoS ONE, 19(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297039
Jo, H. (2025). Interplay among collaborative culture, empowerment leadership, and IT work environment in the public sector: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102883
Kareem, O., Aliyu, O. A., & Salimon, M. G. (2025). Does the Islamic work ethic moderate the relationship between organizational culture and enterprise performance? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(2), 298–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2022-0480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2022-0480
Kurnia, N., & Gunawan, G. (2023). Pengaruh Budaya Kerja dan Pembagian Kerja terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan di Kecamatan Sumur Kabupaten Pandeglang. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i3.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i3.191
Lambert, E., Gibson, J., & Bail, K. (2025). ‘I tried to get into their shoes and their culture’. Care worker experiences in cultural end-of-life care: Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 34(3), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17314
Lan, J., & Feng, T. (2025). Role of remote working center in a hybrid work culture. Cities, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105754
Lima, H. D. O., Da Silva, L. M., de Araújo, A. C. L. F., Torres, V. D. M. S., Tavares, L. R., Simões, D., Silveira, S. Q., Ho, A. M. H., Mizubuti, G. B., & Edson Vieira, J. (2025). Patient safety culture through the perspectives of healthcare workers: a longitudinal study in a private healthcare network in Brazil. BMJ Open Quality, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003020
Lindsey-Hall, K. K., Michel, E. J., Kepes, S., Qi, J., Weinzimmer, L. G., Wheeler, A. R., & Leon, M. R. (2023). A Q&A primer and systematic review of meta-analytic reporting in organizational frontline service research. Journal of Service Management, 34(5), 995–1020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-07-2022-0229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-07-2022-0229
Pan, C., & Alizadeh, F. (2025). External Communication of Costume Culture in Chinese Film and Television Works. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i1.7170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i1.7170
Rahman, S.-U., Chen, S., Al-Faryan, M. A. S., Ahmad, I., Hussain, R. Y., & Saud, S. (2023). Audit services and financial reporting quality: The role of accounting expertise auditors. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2164142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2164142
Røe, C., Gutenbrunner, C., Bökel, A., Kirkevold, M., Nugraha, B., Andelic, N., Juan, L. U., Bautz-Holter, E., Perrin, P. B., Anke, A., Jahnsen, R., Månum, G., Howe, E., Kildal Bragstad, L., & Soberg, H. L. (2024). Proposed categories for reporting of service organization in rehabilitation in clinical trials: a discussion paper. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 60(6), 1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08494-6
Saputra, M. P. P., & Adnyani, I. G. A. D. (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi, Komunikasi Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24843/ejmunud.2019.v08.i01.p01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24843/EJMUNUD.2019.v08.i01.p01
Setiawan, A., Saputra, H. A., & Fridayani, H. D. (2021). POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC SPHERE DEMOCRACY (AN ANALYSIS: THE HASHTAGS USAGE OF REJECTION THE OMNIBUS LAW 2020 ON TWITTER). Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v14i1.2106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v14i1.2106
Shi, L., Hong Teoh, S., & Zhou, J. (2023). Non-Audit Services in Audit Committee Interlocked Firms, Financial Reporting Quality, and Future Performance. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 38(4), 804–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211015552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211015552
Siebers, J. (2020). Philosophy as communication theory. Sign Systems Studies, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.1.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2020.48.1.08
Stojkov, A. D., Schein, R. M., Berner, T., Beauregard, T., & DiGiovine, C. P. (2024). Common reasons for non-participation during the outcome measurement process: wheeled mobility service delivery quality improvement reporting. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(4), 1210–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2159077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2159077
Sullivan, J. L., Shin, M. H., Chan, J., Shwartz, M., Miech, E. J., Borzecki, A. M., Yackel, E., Yende, S., & Rosen, A. K. (2024). Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the “Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook.” Health Services Research, 59(S2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14317
Syahputri, A. Z., Fallenia, F. Della, & Syafitri, R. (2023). Kerangka berfikir penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(1).
Tian, S., Xie, G., Xu, F., & Zhang, J. (2024). Development of regional pharmacy intravenous admixture services data reporting and analysis platform for enhanced quality control ability. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10696-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10696-8
Zulkifli, Z. (2017). PENGARUH BUDAYA KERJA DAN PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK KANTOR URUSAN AGAMA KECAMATAN ALUH ALUH KABUPATEN BANJAR. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.35972/jieb.v3i2.101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35972/jieb.v3i2.101
