Augmented and Virtual Reality Training and Its Contribution to Safety Behaviour Readiness: A Descriptive Evaluation of the SMITAC Programme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/jkkki.v2i1.1358Keywords:
augmented reality, virtual reality, safety behaviour, immersive training, descriptive evaluationAbstract
This study examines workforce readiness towards Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality based safety training implemented under the SMITAC programme. Despite growing interest in immersive technologies within high-risk industries, empirical evidence on user readiness in the electrical utility context remains limited. A descriptive cross-sectional evaluation was conducted involving 240 non-executive technical personnel who participated in 17 training sessions delivered at ILSAS (Selangor), Johor, and Penang. Readiness was operationalised across four perception domains, namely suitability of AR for electrical work, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and organisational implementation support, measured using a five-point Likert scale. The findings indicate generally high acceptance of immersive training, with participants reporting clearer procedural understanding, reduced learning pressure, and improved task confidence following exposure to AR and VR modules. Instructor facilitation was also rated as an important supporting factor for effective learning transfer. Overall readiness scores were high across domains, suggesting favourable workforce disposition towards immersive safety training adoption. However, as the evaluation relied on self-reported perceptions and descriptive analysis, the results should be interpreted as early readiness indicators rather than evidence of behavioural change. The study provides an empirical baseline for scaling immersive training within the electrical utility sector and highlights the need for future longitudinal and Structural Equation Modeling based research incorporating objective safety performance measures.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2022). Innovative Pedagogical Principles and Technological Tools Capabilities for Immersive Blended Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 6523–6560.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Bowdler, M., Steijn, W., & van der Beek, D. (2023). Effective Components of Behavioural Interventions Aiming to Reduce Injury Within the Workplace: A Systematic Review. Safety, 9(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9030046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9030046
Carra, S., Bottani, E., Vignali, G., & others. (2024). Implementation of Behavior Based Safety in the Workplace: A Review of Conceptual and Empirical Literature. Safety, 10(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310195
Cheung, G. W., Cooper Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Kwong, C. Y. Y. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best practice recommendations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 3–23
Choi, Y. S. (2017). Relationships among Self Efficacy, Regulatory Focus, and Perceived Managerial Safety Practice for Employees Safety Performance. Safety and Health at Work, 8(4), 481–488.
Clarke, S. (2006). The Relationship between Safety Climate and Safety Performance: A Meta Analytic Review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315
Cordeiro, A., Ferreira, Y., Leite, R., & others. (2025). Immersive Technologies for Evaluating Industrial Safety Training in High Risk Environments: A Review on Opportunities and Challenges. Virtual Reality. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1726058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1726058
Cornelissen, P. A., van Hoof, J. J., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017). Determinants of Safety Outcomes and Performance: A Systematic Literature Review of Research in Four High Risk Industries. Safety Science, 99, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.009
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dyreborg, J., Lipscomb, H. J., Nielsen, K. J., & Tingleff, E. B. (2022). Safety Interventions for the Prevention of Accidents at Work: A Systematic Review. Journal of Safety Research, 80, 268–282.
Fleury, S., Bernard, F., Paquin, R., & others. (2023). Augmented and Virtual Reality Simulation in Industry. In Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXVI (pp. 198–203). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3283311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3283311
Gao, Y., González, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2022). The Effectiveness of Traditional Tools and Computer Aided Technologies for Health and Safety Training in the Construction Sector: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(20), 13386.
Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
Gunnell, D. O. A., Kunar, M. A., & Norman, D. G. (2019). The Hazards of Perception: Evaluating a Change Blindness Demonstration within a Real World Driver Education Course. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 122, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0165-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0165-4
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hofmann, D. A., Burke, M. J., & Zohar, D. (2017). One Hundred Years of Occupational Safety Research: From Basic Protections and Work Analysis to a Multilevel View of Workplace Safety and Risk. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000114
Hou, L., Chi, H. L., & Tarng, W. (2017). A Framework of Innovative Learning for Skill Development in Complex Operational Tasks. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 15(1), 1–19.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kassem, M., Benomran, L., & Teizer, J. (2017). Virtual Environments for Safety Learning in Construction and Engineering: Seeking Evidence and Identifying Gaps for Future Research. Safety Science, 97, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0054-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0054-1
Lehikko, A., Nykänen, M., Lukander, K., & others. (2024). Exploring Interactivity Effects on Learners Sense of Agency, Cognitive Load, and Learning Outcomes in Immersive Virtual Reality. Computers and Education: X Reality, 4, 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100066
Mousavi, S. M. A., Powell, W., Louwerse, M. M., & others. (2023). Behavior and Self Efficacy Modulate Learning in Virtual Reality Simulations for Training: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Virtual Reality, 27, 2165–2180. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1250823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1250823
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A Study of the Lagged Relationships among Safety Climate, Safety Motivation, Safety Behavior, and Accidents at the Individual and Group Levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
Nielsen, K., Shepherd, R., Vignoli, M., & others. (2021). The Integrated Migrant Worker Safety Training Evaluation Model: IMSTEM. Safety Science, 137, 105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105246
Peña Ríos, A., Hagras, H., Owusu, G., & others. (2018). Furthering Service 4.0: Harnessing Intelligent Immersive Environments and Systems. Computers in Industry, 100, 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSMC.2017.2769199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSMC.2017.2769199
Peng, M. (2023). Evaluation and Analysis of the Implementation Effects in Practical Course Blended Learning Based on Virtual Reality Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 164–182.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in Education. Computers and Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Reason, J. (1997). Human Error: Models and Management. Cambridge University Press.
Rizqullah, N., Fabroyir, H., Yonia, D. L., & others. (2024). Integrating AR into School Fire Safety Training: Enhancing Knowledge, Motivation, and Self Efficacy. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 13(1), 1–7.
Smirnova, A., Zaychenko, I., Bagaeva, I., & others. (2020). Digital Technologies in the Industry: Application of Immersive Training Technologies in the Oil and Gas Complex. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1582, 12061. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208403003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208403003
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Zhang, Y., Abdullah, M. R. T. L., Khan, N. H. A. L., & others. (2022). High Safety Risk Assessment in the Time of Uncertainties: An Industrial Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 834361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834361
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
