Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Intellecta: Journal of Artificial Intelligence employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure high-quality publications:
- Preliminary Evaluation: The Editor-in-Chief screens submissions for scope alignment and guideline adherence.
- External Expert Assessment: Passing manuscripts are assigned to a handling editor, who forwards them to at least two subject matter experts for double-blind review.
- Decision Based on Collective Input: A minimum of two expert reviews are required before decision-making. Possible outcomes include rejection, minor or major revision requests, acceptance, or recommendation for resubmission. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision with editorial board approval.
- Internal Revision Phase: Authors have three weeks to revise their manuscripts. The handling editor reassesses the revisions, potentially repeating the process if changes are insufficient.
- Final Verdict: The revised manuscript is either accepted or rejected based on whether it meets the journal's publication standards.
This comprehensive process ensures that published articles in Intellecta: Journal of Artificial Intelligence maintain high standards of academic quality and originality.
