Digital Reform and Civil Service Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Implementation of SIASN, MyASN, and MOLA in Indonesia

Authors

  • Jarot Sembodo Suroso Universitas Pradita
  • Barisan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/data.v3i3.925

Keywords:

Administrative Efficiency, Civil Service Reform, Digital Governance, E Government, SIASN, Difference in Differences

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of integrated digital personnel systems namely SIASN, MyASN, and MOLA on administrative efficiency within Indonesia’s civil service. These platforms were introduced as part of a broader e government reform initiative designed to simplify civil servant workflows, reduce delays, and improve transparency. This study specifically evaluates whether the systems shorten turnaround time (TAT) for services including promotions, retirements, and inter-agency transfers. Employing a Difference in Differences (DiD) approach, this research analyzes panel data from regional civil service offices, comparing outcomes in treated and control regions before and after the implementation of digital systems in late 2022. Data sources include timestamped service records from MOLA, performance reports (LKjIP and LAKIP), and SPBE index scores as a proxy for digital readiness. Key outcomes assessed include average TAT and the percentage of services completed within national performance benchmarks. The findings reveal a statistically significant reduction in TAT across all service categories in treated regions. Retirement processing times dropped by an average of 3.4 days, while promotion and transfer services saw reductions of 1.7 and 2.0 days respectively. The percentage of on time promotions increased by 26.4%. Results were more pronounced in regions with higher SPBE scores, underscoring the importance of institutional digital capacity. Robustness checks affirmed the reliability of the findings across various model specifications. The study concludes that digital personnel systems substantially enhance administrative performance when supported by institutional capacity and strategic implementation frameworks. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers seeking to scale digital reforms across the public sector. By reinforcing efficiency, accountability, and responsiveness, integrated systems represent a critical step toward modernizing governance in Indonesia.

References

Amatya, V., & Pathranarakul, P. (2021). Coping With Digital Divide in Governance: A Nepalese Perspective of Civil Service Reform. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 11(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i2.18681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i2.18681

Aminah, S., & Saksono, H. (2021). Digital Transformation of the Government: A Case Study in Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkmjc-2021-3702-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3702-17

Basu, S., Meghani, A., & Siddiqi, A. (2017). Evaluating the Health Impact of Large-Scale Public Policy Changes: Classical and Novel Approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(1), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044208

Bitler, M., Gelbach, J. B., & Hoynes, H. (2017). Can Variation in Subgroups’ Average Treatment Effects Explain Treatment Effect Heterogeneity? Evidence From a Social Experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(4), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00662

Bonner, M., & Ellender, G. (2022). Military Training: Does It Predispose Service Personnel to Negative Mental Health Issues? 2(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.33696/mentalhealth.2.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33696/mentalhealth.2.012

Chien, N. B., & Thanh, N. N. (2022). The Impact of Good Governance on the People’s Satisfaction With Public Administrative Services in Vietnam. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010035

Cyan, M., & Pasha, O. (2017). A Symbiosis of Civil Service and Politics in Transfers: The Case of Pakistan’s Management Cadres. Public Administration, 95(4), 1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12355

din, M. Z. u., yuan, X. Y., & Khan, N. U. (2023). The Impact of Public Leadership on Collaborative Administration and Public Health Delivery. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3198803/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3198803/v1

Dwicaksono, A., & Fox, A. (2018). Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies. Milbank Quarterly, 96(2), 323–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12327

Gil-García, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2017). Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181

Hammerschmid, G., Walle, S. V. d., Andrews, R., & Mostafa, A. (2018). New Public Management Reforms in Europe and Their Effects: Findings From a 20-Country Top Executive Survey. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632

Henson, R. W. (2023). Human Resource Management in Information Technology System-Based Public Services in Developing Regions of Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study, 3(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v3i4.357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrems.v3i4.357

Katoue, M. G., Cerda, A. A., García, L. Y., & Jakovljević, M. (2022). Healthcare System Development in the Middle East and North Africa Region: Challenges, Endeavors and Prospective Opportunities. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045739

Kazachenko, V. O., & Paço, A. (2022). Digital Communication Tools in a Public Sector: Ukraine Case-Study of National Security Providing. Strategy of Economic Development of Ukraine, 50, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.33111/sedu.2022.50.094.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33111/sedu.2022.50.094.105

Kirana, N. W. I., & Majid, N. (2022). Challenges of Digital Transformation on Good Governance for Improving Public Services Quality. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2022.2307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2022.2307

Künzel, S. R., Sekhon, J. S., Bickel, P. J., & Yu, B. (2019). Metalearners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Machine Learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 4156–4165. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804597116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804597116

Lolo, J. M. N., & Cabigas, M. E. A. (2023). The School Heads’ and Personnels’ Perception on Administrative Services. International Journal of Research Publications, 126(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001261620225032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001261620225032

Mansyur, N. A. (2023). The Challenges of Personnel Management for Public Service Organizations in the Era of Technological Disruption in Indonesia. Journal of Management and Administration Provision, 3(3), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v3i3.287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v3i3.287

Nugroho, A. A., Rahayu, N. S., & Yusuf, R. R. (2023). The Role of E-Government to Improve the Implementation of Merit System in Indonesian Local Goverments. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13570

Odegov, J., Malakhova, E. V., & Гарнов, А. (2019). Digitalization of Business Processes in Human Resources Management of Russian Industrial Enterprises. https://doi.org/10.2991/csis-18.2019.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/csis-18.2019.19

Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019). Public Value Creation in Digital Government. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421

Polyakova, A. (2020). Civil Service, HR Potential, and Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 6(4), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040174

Poulos, C., Wakeford, C., Kinter, E., Mange, B., Schenk, T., & Jhaveri, M. (2020). Patient and Physician Preferences for Multiple Sclerosis Treatments in Germany: A Discrete-Choice Experiment Study. Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217320910778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217320910778

Rattus, R., & Randma‐Liiv, T. (2018). Leaving the Senior Civil Service – Public Service Bargain and Beyond: The Case of Estonia. Public Policy and Administration, 34(4), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718804862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718804862

Saeed, S., Altamimi, S. A., Alkayyal, N. A., Alshehri, E., & Alabbad, D. A. (2023). Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity Challenges for Businesses Resilience: Issues and Recommendations. Sensors, 23(15), 6666. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156666

Silverblatt, J. A., Ziff, O. J., Dancy, L., Daniel, A., Carter, B., Scott, P. A., Sado, D., Shah, A. M., & Bromage, D. I. (2019). Therapies to Limit Myocardial Injury in Animal Models of Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Basic Research in Cardiology, 114(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-019-0754-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-019-0754-x

Simonova, M., Lyachenkov, Y., & Kravchenko, A. (2020). HR Innovation Risk Assessment. E3s Web of Conferences, 157, 04024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015704024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015704024

Sudha, S., Azam, S. M. F., & Tham, J. (2023). Transformational Leadership and Job Performance of Maldives Civil Service Employees, Mediated by Organisational Commitment. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-09-2022-0198 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2022-0198

Tươi, N. T., & Thanh, N. N. (2023). The Impact of Digital Capabilities on the Work Performance of Provincial Civil Servants in Vietnam. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), e560. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i4.560

Wager, S., & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), 1228–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839

Wing, C., Simon, K., & Bello-Gómez, R. A. (2018). Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39(1), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507

Yesennikov, K. (2021). Efficiency of the Civil Service System as a Factor of Sustainable Development of Society. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Public Administration, 13(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2021/13-3/9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2021/13-3/9

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Suroso, J. S., & Barisan. (2025). Digital Reform and Civil Service Performance: Empirical Evidence from the Implementation of SIASN, MyASN, and MOLA in Indonesia. Data : Journal of Information Systems and Management, 3(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.61978/data.v3i3.925

Issue

Section

Articles