Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Catalyx: Journal of Process Chemistry and Technology employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure high-quality publications:
- Preliminary Evaluation: The Editor-in-Chief screens submissions for scope alignment and adherence to guidelines.
- External Expert Assessment: Manuscripts passing initial screening are assigned to a handling editor, who forwards them to at least two subject matter experts for double-blind review.
- Decision Making: Based on at least two expert reviews, possible outcomes include:
- Rejection
- Request for minor revisions
- Request for major revisions
- Acceptance without changes
- Recommendation for resubmission
In cases of conflicting reviews, a third reviewer may be engaged. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision with editorial board approval.
- Revision Phase: Authors have three weeks to revise their manuscripts. The handling editor reassesses revised versions, potentially initiating further revision cycles if necessary.
- Final Verdict: The handling editor determines whether the revised manuscript meets the journal's standards, leading to either acceptance or rejection.
This comprehensive process ensures that all published articles in Catalyx: Journal of Process Chemistry and Technology meet high standards of academic quality and originality.
