Energy-Optimized Design of Multicomponent High-Purity Distillation: Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and Intensified Configurations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/catalyx.v2i1.1275

Keywords:

high-purity distillation, energy efficiency, Dividing-Wall Column, heat-pump distillation, thermodynamic targeting, process intensification, sustainability

Abstract

This study presents a comparative assessment of energy-saving configurations for high-purity multicomponent distillation, focusing on conventional column sequences, Dividing-Wall Columns (DWCs), side utility integration, and heat-pump-assisted systems. The objective is to evaluate each configuration’s potential for energy reduction, economic feasibility, and operational robustness. A ternary system was analyzed using shortcut design (Fenske–Underwood–Gilliland), rigorous MESH simulation, and thermodynamic targeting via Column Grand Composite Curve (CGCC). Optimization parameters included reflux ratio, stage count, feed location, and pressure. Simulations revealed that DWCs and heat-pump configurations achieved energy savings of 35–40% compared to the conventional setup. Side utility integration and feed stage/reflux optimization provided moderate reductions of 10–18%. Thermodynamic targeting identified a pinch temperature of 8°C, confirming potential for further heat integration through side reboilers and condensers. Sensitivity analysis indicated that DWCs and heat-pump systems maintained stable product purity and energy performance under ±5% feed variation. While DWCs and heat-pump systems involve higher capital costs, long-term operational savings justify investment. Control and integration complexity were addressed through discussion of adaptive strategies and predictive control methodologies. These findings suggest that intensified distillation configurations significantly enhance process efficiency and offer viable pathways toward sustainable chemical separation.

References

Aqar, D. Y., Rahmanian, N., & Mujtaba, I. M. (2017). Synthesis of Methyl Decanoate Using Different Types of Batch Reactive Distillation Systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(14), 3969–3982. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04255

Asadollahi, M. A., Farahani, F. J., & Seader, J. D. (2017). Optimization of Distillation Separations Using Feed Splitting by a Homotopy Continuation Method. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(15), 4463–4476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03947

Aurangzeb, M., & Jana, A. K. (2018). Pressure-Swing Dividing Wall Column With Multiple Binary Azeotropes: Improving Energy Efficiency and Cost Savings Through Vapor Recompression. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(11), 4019–4032. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03586

Carlos, B.-P. J., & Kolomaznı́k, K. (2019). Use of Approximate Methods to Determine Minimum Reflux Ratio in Distillation Process. Matec Web of Conferences, 292, 01050. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929201050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929201050

Chen, H., Cai, D., Chen, C., Wang, J., Qin, P., & Tan, T. (2018). Novel Distillation Process for Effective and Stable Separation of High-Concentration Acetone–butanol–ethanol Mixture From Fermentation–pervaporation Integration Process. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1284-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1284-8

Christopher, C. C. E., Dutta, A., Farooq, S., & Karimi, I. A. (2017). Process Synthesis and Optimization of Propylene/Propane Separation Using Vapor Recompression and Self-Heat Recuperation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(49), 14557–14564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03432

Feng, Z., Shen, W., Rangaiah, G. P., & Dong, L. (2018). Proportional-Integral Control and Model Predictive Control of Extractive Dividing-Wall Column Based on Temperature Differences. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(31), 10572–10590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02729

Franke, M. B. (2017). Design of Dividing‐Wall Columns by Mixed‐Integer Nonlinear Programming Optimization. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 89(5), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700005

Jamali, M. A., Bissenbay, A., & Nuraje, N. (2023). Thermodynamic Modeling and Process Simulation of Kumkol Crude Oil Refining. Eurasian Chemico-Technological Journal, 25(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1521

Jaubert, J., Guennec, Y. L., Piña‐Martinez, A., Ramírez‐Vélez, N., Lasala, S., Schmid, B., Nikolaidis, I. K., Economou, I. G., & Privat, R. (2020). Benchmark Database Containing Binary-System-High-Quality-Certified Data for Cross-Comparing Thermodynamic Models and Assessing Their Accuracy. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59(33), 14981–15027. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01734

Kartawiria, I. S. (2023). Energy Requirement Evaluation of Spray Distillation Technology as Green Alternative of Bioethanol Downstream Processing. Rekayasa Bahan Alam Dan Energi Berkelanjutan, 7(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rbaet.2023.007.01.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rbaet.2023.007.01.01

Kong, Z. Y., Wang, Q., Yang, A., Qin, Z., Heah, J. Y., & Sunarso, J. (2023). Control of New Energy‐intensified Triple Column Extractive Distillation Using Feed Split Technique. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 98(7), 1742–1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7398

Kroiss, D., Udugama, I. A., & Yu, W. (2017). Feasibility of Divided Wall Column for High Purity and High Recovery Methanol Separation. https://doi.org/10.2316/p.2017.853-025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2316/P.2017.853-025

Kunde, C., Keßler, T., Linke, S., McBride, K., Sundmacher, K., & Kienle, A. (2019). Surrogate Modeling for Liquid–Liquid Equilibria Using a Parameterization of the Binodal Curve. Processes, 7(10), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7100753

Liu, C., Huang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, T. C., Liu, L., & Liu, H. (2017). Total Environmental Impacts of Biofuels From Corn Stover Using a Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Model Combining Process Life Cycle Assessment and Economic Input–output Life Cycle Assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 14(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1969

Muhammad, N. I. S., & Rosentrater, K. A. (2020). Economic Assessment of Bioethanol Recovery Using Membrane Distillation for Food Waste Fermentation. Bioengineering, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7010015

Nhien, L. C., Long, N. V. D., & Lee, M. (2016). Design and Optimization of the Levulinic Acid Recovery Process From Lignocellulosic Biomass. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 107, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.09.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.09.013

Osuolale, F. N., & Zhang, J. (2016). Energy Efficiency Optimisation for Distillation Column Using Artificial Neural Network Models. Energy, 106, 562–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.051

Qian, X., Liu, R., Huang, K., Chen, H., Yuan, Y., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2020). Controllability Comparison of the Four-Product Petlyuk Dividing Wall Distillation Column Using Temperature Control Schemes. Processes, 8(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8010116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8010116

Querino, M. V., Machado, R. A. F., & Marangoni, C. (2019). Energy and Exergetic Evaluation of the Multicomponent Separation of Petrochemical Naphtha in Falling Film Distillation Columns. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 36(3), 1357–1365. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20190363s20180379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20190363s20180379

Ramapriya, G. M., Selvarajah, A., Cucaita, L. E. J., Huff, J., Tawarmalani, M., & Agrawal, R. (2018). Short-Cut Methods Versus Rigorous Methods for Performance-Evaluation of Distillation Configurations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(22), 7726–7731. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b05214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b05214

Recker, S., Gordon, C. M., Peace, A., Redepenning, C., & Marquardt, W. (2017). Systematic Design of a Butadiene Telomerization Process: The Catalyst Makes the Difference. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 89(11), 1479–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700055

Saxena, N., Mali, N. A., & Satpute, S. R. (2017). Study of Thermally Coupled Distillation Systems for Energy-Efficient Distillation. Sadhana, 42(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0580-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0580-x

Schack, D., Jastram, A., Liesche, G., & Sundmacher, K. (2020). Energy-Efficient Distillation Processes by Additional Heat Transfer Derived From the FluxMax Approach. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00134

Singh, A., & Rangaiah, G. P. (2018). Development and Optimization of a Novel Process of Double‐effect Distillation With Vapor Recompression for Bioethanol Recovery and Vapor Permeation for Bioethanol Dehydration. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 94(4), 1041–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5851

Torli, M., Geer, L., Kontogeorgis, G. M., & Fosbøl, P. L. (2021). Benchmarking of Separation Methods for Bioethanol (≪5 Wt %) Recovery. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 60(16), 5924–5944. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00087

Villareal-Hernández, A. C., Ramírez-Mendiola, M. D., Quiroz‐Ramírez, J. J., Sánchez‐Ramírez, E., Huerta-Rosas, B., Contreras‐Zarazúa, G., & Segovia‐Hernández, J. G. (2023). Intensification of the Oligomerization and Hydrogenation Stage for Biojet Fuel Production: Preliminary Outlines. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(22), 8820–8833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c00234

Wan, Z., Zhou, C., Lin, Y., Chen, L., & Tian, Z. (2024). Computational Understanding of Na-Lta for Ethanol–water Separation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 26(5), 4505–4510. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cp06046b DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP06046B

Worms, G., Meyer, M., Rouzineau, D., & Brehelin, M. (2017). Production Zone Method: A New Non-Ideal Shortcut Method for Distillation Column Design. 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63965-3.50126-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63965-3.50126-4

Ye, H., Zou, X., Zhu, W., Yang, Y., Dong, H., & Bi, M. (2020). Synthesis and Optimization of Reaction–Separation–Recycle Systems With Complex Distillation Sequences. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59(22), 10509–10530. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00392

Yuan, Y., Huang, K., Chen, H., Qian, X., Zang, L., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2020). Comparing Composition Control Structures for Kaibel Distillation Columns. Processes, 8(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8020218

Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Qin, B., Zhu, Z., Zhang, N., & Wang, Y. (2017). Control of a Ternary Extractive Distillation Process With Recycle Splitting Using a Mixed Entrainer. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57(1), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04071

Zhou, X., Wang, M., Song, E., & Wang, E. (2023). Integration of Dividing Wall Columns With Middle Vessels for Batch Distillation Under Total Reflux: Modeling and Optimization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 62(32), 12589–12599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01328

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

Ruchiyat. (2025). Energy-Optimized Design of Multicomponent High-Purity Distillation: Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and Intensified Configurations. Catalyx : Journal of Process Chemistry and Technology, 2(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.61978/catalyx.v2i1.1275