Implementation of Education Digitalization Policy in Central Kalimantan: IFP/Smart Board Utilization Readiness in Pulang Pisau Senior High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v4i1.1446Keywords:
Policy Implementation, Education Digitalization, Interactive Flat Panel, Smart Board, Central KalimantanAbstract
This article maps implementation readiness for the education digitalization policy in Central Kalimantan Province through the use of Interactive Flat Panels (IFPs)/smart boards at senior high schools in Pulang Pisau Regency. Using an integrated lens (Edwards III + TAM + TPACK), the study distinguishes between “devices being available” and “devices being used meaningfully” by examining governance arrangements, infrastructure conditions, and pedagogical integration. A multi-site case study across nine schools (eight subdistricts) combined a review of policies/documents, administrative facility profiles (Kemendikdasmen Education Data), and a descriptive survey of school-level implementers (n = 25). The analysis shows that the use of IFPs/smart boards has the potential to strengthen interactive learning and support the Merdeka Curriculum. A consistent pattern was frequent and positively perceived use: 73.3% of respondents reported using IFPs at least five times per week, most commonly for collaborative projects (40.0%) and presentations (33.3%), while 80.0% reported using interactive features in more than 50% of sessions. Nevertheless, readiness varies according to operational conditions and governance, particularly reliance on personal hotspots when connectivity is limited (53.3%), uneven consistency in SOP implementation (20.0% reported written SOPs that were not implemented consistently; 13.3% reported relying only on informal SOPs), and technical-support arrangements (only 40.0% reported formal reporting channels with rapid responses and/or service-time targets). This study does not measure classroom learning outcomes; rather, it reports readiness and governance conditions that shape routine use. A feasible minimum implementation package should prioritize: (1) standardized SOPs for use, access, and asset governance; (2) sustained TPACK-oriented mentoring; and (3) tiered maintenance/helpdesk arrangements and utilization monitoring focused on usage indicators rather than procurement.
References
Anggraini, T. (2019). Inovasi birokrasi pelayanan publik di Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (DPMPTSP) Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Politeia, 11(2), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v11i2.1122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v11i2.1122
ANTARA. (2025). Pemprov Kalteng siapkan perangkat interaktif digital sejak 2024.
Budianti, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Platform Merdeka Mengajar dalam meningkatkan kompetensi guru di daerah 3T. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 24390–24396.
Central Kalimantan Provincial Education Office. (2025). Tampil Memukau! Kalteng UKT Memanfaatkan Papan Tulis Interaktif, Login Guru Sebelum Mengajar.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Directorate General of Early Childhood Primary, & Education, S. (2025). Konfirmasi Program Digitalisasi Pendidikan.
Edwards III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Faizah, H., Auzar, Yusma, M., & Yeni, S. (2024). Efektivitas penggunaan media papan tulis interaktif terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia (n.d.) di MAN 2 Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 23226–23232.
Fatrisna, Y., Sesmira, M., Mudarti, H., & Rahmi, S. (2024). Analisis kebijakan digitalisasi dan teknologi dalam pendidikan. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i6.2253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i6.2253
Jayanthi, R., & Dinaseviani, A. (2022). Kesenjangan digital dan solusi yang diterapkan di Indonesia selama pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal IPTEK-KOM, 24(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.17933/iptekkom.24.2.2022.187-200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17933/iptekkom.24.2.2022.187-200
Kyriakou, A., & Higgins, S. (2016). Systematic review of the studies examining the impact of the interactive whiteboard on teaching and learning. Preschool & Primary Education, 4, 254–275. https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.9873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.9873
Lai, Y.-O. (2019). The application of meta-analytic SEM on exploring factors that influence teachers’ usage of interactive whiteboard. Pedagogical Research, 4(3), em0038. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/5854
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Nanda, D. W., Salahuddin, A., & Jumaris, R. F. (2024). Pengembangan media pembelajaran smartboard pada keterampilan menulis teks narasi siswa kelas V SD Negeri 09 Koto Baru. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD FKIP Universitas Mandiri, 10(3), 345–351.
Olivares, D. D., & Castillo, R. R. (2018). ICT in the classroom: Student teachers’ perceptions of the interactive whiteboard. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2309–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9716-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9716-4
Onitsuka, K., Hidayat, A. R. T., & Huang, W. (2018). Challenges for the next level of digital divide in rural Indonesian communities. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84, e12021. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12021
Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045
President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025, November 17). Presiden Prabowo Resmi Luncurkan Program Digitalisasi Pembelajaran untuk Indonesia Cerdas di 38 Provinsi. Press Release of the President of the Republic of Indonesia.
Purwanto, P. (2013). Penggunaan papan tulis interaktif di kelas. Jurnal Teknodik, 17(3), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v17i3.565
Pusdatin Kemendikdasmen. (n.d.). Data Pendidikan Kemendikdasmen (Data Referensi Pendidikan): Profil satuan pendidikan jenjang SMA di Kabupaten Pulang Pisau. Accessed January 16, 2026.
Regif, S. (2019). Analisis penggunaan CCTV Kota Medan pada aplikasi e-government Sumut Smart Province. Politeia, 11(2), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v11i2.1081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v11i2.1081
Sari, P. N., & Miyono, N. (2023). Peran digitalisasi sekolah dalam meningkatkan manajemen mutu pendidikan pada Taman Kanak-Kanak Negeri Pembina Kabupaten Semarang. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran di Sekolah, 4(2), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i2.177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i2.177
Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, H., & Yang, H. H. (2021). Effects of interactive whiteboard-based instruction on students’ cognitive learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769683
Šumak, B., & Šorgo, A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037
Teng, M. F. (2021). Interactive whiteboard supported collaborative writing. System, 97, 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102426
Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Çubukçu, Z., & Beauchamp, G. (2021). Factors affecting interactive whiteboard usage. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3575–3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10428-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10428-z
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977500600404
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Politeia : Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
