A Systematic Literature Review on Integrating Ethics and Axiology into Organizational Digital Transformation Strategies

Authors

  • Arus Reka Prasetia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-9641
  • Widy Muchamad Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Gilang Bhirawa Noraga Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Edi Suryadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Rasto Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/novatio.v4i1.1259

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Strategic Management, Ethics, Axiology, Digital Governance

Abstract

Digital transformation is a key organizational strategy, yet data-intensive systems and artificial intelligence amplify ethical dilemmas and contested value choices. Prior reviews cover digital transformation, AI ethics, and corporate digital responsibility, but rarely explain how ethical principles and axiological values are operationalized across the strategic lifecycle. This systematic literature review maps integration mechanisms in strategy formulation and implementation, identifies the ethical orientations that underpin them, and synthesizes recurring barriers and responses. We screened Scopus journal articles in English published from 2019 to 2025 and appraised quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; 70 medium or high quality studies were synthesized through narrative synthesis and reflexive thematic analysis. Ethics and axiology are most often embedded through governance arrangements and formal policies, supported by stakeholder engagement and transparency and accountability practices. Explicit references to classical normative theories are less frequent than applied framings grounded in stakeholder orientation, responsibility, and responsible AI. Common barriers include governance gaps, cultural resistance, cybersecurity risks, and privacy concerns, and responses emphasize strengthened governance, capability building, and auditable oversight. The review’s novelty is a lifecycle-oriented synthesis that links normative foundations to concrete, auditable strategic mechanisms. It translates fragmented debates into a transferable, mechanism-based map that can guide governance design and future empirical testing. Based on these patterns, we propose an axiological lens as a practical strategic compass for making value commitments explicit, actionable, and continuously evaluated.

References

Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465

Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean Ethics (R. Crisp, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802058

Bian, X., Wang, B., Li, K., & Du, Z. (2025). Navigating ethical decision-making in digital transformation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 920. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05184-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05184-1

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Carl, K. V, & Hinz, O. (2024). What we already know about corporate digital responsibility in IS research. Electronic Markets, 34(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00708-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-024-00708-0

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005

Floridi, L. (2018). Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the GDPR. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376(2133), 20180081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0081

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., & others. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Fülöp, M. T., Ionescu, C. A., & Topor, D. I. (2025). Digital business world and ethical dilemmas. Digital Finance, 7(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00119-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00119-y

Gouveia, S., de la Iglesia, D. H., Abrantes, J. L., & López Rivero, A. J. (2024). Transforming strategy and value creation through digitalization. Administrative Sciences, 14(11), 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14110307

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., & others. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., & others. (2019). Improving the content validity of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 111, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008

Illia, L., Romenti, S., Rodríguez-Cánovas, B., & others. (2017). Exploring corporations’ dialogue about CSR in the digital era. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2924-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2924-6

Imaniyati, N., Ramdhany, M. A., Rasto, & others. (2024). Neuroscience intervention for implementing digital transformation. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(2), 287–336. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v9i2.67763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v9i2.67763

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Kant, I. (2011). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (M. Gregor & J. Timmermann, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973741

Levine, L. (2019). Digital trust and cooperation. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04201-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04201-z

Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., & others. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006

Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5

Mill, J. S. (2014). Utilitarianism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139923927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139923927

Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4

Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From what to how. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2141–2168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5

Muchamad, W., Sukmawan, N. R., Agustin, L., & Afriyadi, R. (2025). Kinerja keuangan PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk di era pandemi melalui analisis rasio profitabilitas. JUSTIKA: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, 5(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.31294/justika.i5v1.9096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/justika.i5v1.9096

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., & others. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pransiska, D., Hasanah, A. S., & Noraga, G. B. (2024). Peran motivasi dan lingkungan kerja dalam meningkatkan kinerja karyawan. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 1(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmrd.v1i1.615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56916/jmrd.v1i1.615

Prasetia, A. R. (2025). AI-Powered Platform Business Models. ICEBEF, 1–5.

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3

Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., Heavey, C., & Liu, S. (2025). Methodological rigor in management research reviews. Journal of Management, 51(1), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241237222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241237222

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sobandi, A., Suryadi, E., Ramdhany, M. A., & Rasto. (2021). Knowledge management process, knowledge sharing, and teacher literacy skills at vocational high schools. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(3), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.42489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i3.42489

Stratton-Lake, P. (2005). G. E. Moore: Principia Ethica. Central Works of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653614.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773598126-004

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., & others. (2021). Digital transformation. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Prasetia, A. R., Muchamad, W., Noraga, G. B., Suryadi, E., & Rasto. (2026). A Systematic Literature Review on Integrating Ethics and Axiology into Organizational Digital Transformation Strategies. Novatio : Journal of Management Technology and Innovation , 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.61978/novatio.v4i1.1259