Optimizing Logistics Distribution in Archipelagic Economies: A Case Study of North Sulawesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61978/logistica.v2i2.668Keywords:
Logistics Efficiency, Delivery Time, Infrastructure and Technology, Distribution Cost, Archipelagic EconomyAbstract
This study aims to examine the determinants of logistics distribution efficiency in North Sulawesi, Indonesia, an archipelagic region with unique geographical challenges. Using a quantitative explanatory design, data were collected through structured questionnaires from 55 purposively selected logistics stakeholders, and analyzed using multiple linear regression with validity and reliability testing. The results show that delivery time has the strongest positive influence on distribution efficiency (β = 0.482; p = 0.001), followed by infrastructure and technology (β = 0.317; p = 0.021), while distribution cost negatively affects efficiency (β = −0.215; p = 0.034). These findings highlight the critical role of timeliness and technological adoption in overcoming logistical barriers in archipelagic settings. The study contributes by offering practical recommendations for multimodal transport integration, digital adoption, and infrastructure investment to strengthen logistics performance in geographically dispersed economies.
References
Haryanto H, Hapsari DW, HIDAYAH N. Unlocking the Power of Internal Control: How It Lowers Risk and Slashes Logistics Costs in Retail. J Orientasi Bisnis Dan Entrep Jobs. 2024;5(2):133–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33476/jobs.v5i2.4819
Gao H, Yang J, Yin H, Ma Z. The Impact of Partner Similarity on Alliance Management Capability, Stability and Performance. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 2017;47(9):906–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2016-0263
Leung TCH, Guan J, Lau Y. Exploring Environmental Sustainability and Green Management Practices: Evidence From Logistics Service Providers. Sustain Account Manag Policy J. 2023;14(3):461–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2022-0133
Zhang H. E-Commerce Enterprise Brand Image, Seller’s Reputation and Consumers’ Purchasing Intention: Basis for Online Buying Platform Improvement Framework. Int J Res Stud Manag. 2023;11(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsm.2023.1071
Gossler T, Sigala IF, Wakolbinger T, Buber R. Applying the Delphi Method to Determine Best Practices for Outsourcing Logistics in Disaster Relief. J Humanit Logist Supply Chain Manag. 2019;9(3):438–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-06-2018-0044
Yan Y, Cheng J, Wang Y, Li Y. Does Social Trust Stimulate Regional Eco-Efficiency? Evidence From China. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.700139
Thunberg M, Fredriksson A. A Model for Visualizing Cost Shifts When Introducing Construction Logistics Setups. Constr Innov. 2022;23(4):757–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2020-0168
Firdous H, Ramish A. Reverse Logistics Inefficiencies: A Multiple Case Study Analysis of Food Supply Chains From Pakistan and Malaysia. Oper Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2023;365–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0540396
Rudberg M, Maxwell D. Exploring Logistics Strategy in Construction. 2019;529–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30000-5_65
Assis TF d., Marujo LG, Victor Hugo Souza de Abreu, Costa MG d., Rodrigues LM, D’Agosto M d. A. Best Practices to Support the Transition Towards Sustainable Logistics From the Perspective of Brazilian Carriers. Sustainability. 2023;15(18):13434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813434
Gruchmann T, Seuring S. Explaining Logistics Social Responsibility From a Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Int J Logist Manag. 2018;29(4):1255–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2017-0200
Marcellin F, Cousin L, Beo VD, Mahé V, Rousset‐Torrente O, Carrieri P, et al. Impact of the COVID‐19 Crisis on Healthcare Workers: The Need to Address Quality of Working Life Issues. Respirology. 2022;27(6):469–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14265
Sivan S, Anuar R, Krishnasamy T, Bahrin AS, Narayanan NSP, Sundram VPK. Optimizing Safety Practices and Culture: A Comprehensive Examination Through Perception Surveys in Malaysia’s Logistics Industry. Inf Manag Bus Rev. 2024;16(1(I)S):33–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i1(I)S.3723
Gupta M, Malik T, Sinha C. Delivery of a Mental Health Intervention for Chronic Pain Through an Artificial Intelligence–Enabled App (Wysa): Protocol for a Prospective Pilot Study (Preprint). 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.36910
Nurmala N, Leeuw S d., Dullaert W. Humanitarian–business Partnerships in Managing Humanitarian Logistics. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 2017;22(1):82–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2016-0262
Nilsson F. A Complexity Perspective on Logistics Management. Int J Logist Manag. 2019;30(3):681–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-06-2019-0168
Liu S, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang L, Wang XV. An ‘Internet of Things’ Enabled Dynamic Optimization Method for Smart Vehicles and Logistics Tasks. J Clean Prod. 2019;215:806–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.254
Evangelista P, Santoro L, Thomas A. Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review From 2000–2016. Sustainability. 2018;10(5):1627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051627
Bag S, Gupta S. Examining the Effect of Green Human Capital Availability in Adoption of Reverse Logistics and Remanufacturing Operations Performance. Int J Manpow. 2019;41(7):1097–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0349
Chinomona E, Bikissa-Macongue MB. The Impact of Green Supply-Chain Management on Logistics Performance in the Construction Sector in South Africa. J Transp Supply Chain Manag. 2022;16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v16i0.752
