Authorship and Contributorship Policy
Scholarly Contribution • Transparency • Accountability
Authorship and Contributorship Policy
Data : Journal of Information Systems and Management requires authorship to accurately reflect substantial scholarly contributions to research in information systems, information management, digital transformation, business intelligence, enterprise systems, data-driven decision making, IT governance, e-business, digital platforms, and related fields.
SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION CRediT TAXONOMY FULL ACCOUNTABILITY
Authorship represents both academic credit and responsibility. A person should be listed as an author only when they have made a meaningful intellectual contribution to the research and accept responsibility for the integrity, accuracy, transparency, and scholarly quality of the published work.
1. Criteria for Authorship
All listed authors must demonstrate substantial scholarly involvement in the study. Authorship should normally include all of the following:
|
1
|
Substantial Research Contribution Significant contribution to the research problem, conceptual framework, information-systems model, research design, data collection, system requirements, digital-process analysis, dataset preparation, methodology, statistical analysis, qualitative analysis, business analytics, or interpretation of findings. |
|
2
|
Intellectual Contribution to the Manuscript Active participation in drafting the manuscript or critically revising its theoretical framework, information-system architecture, methodology, data analysis, system evaluation, discussion, or scholarly contribution. |
|
3
|
Final Approval Review and approval of the final manuscript, including the accuracy of author names, affiliations, information-system findings, data interpretations, declarations, system-performance claims, and references. |
|
4
|
Accountability Agreement to take responsibility for the author's contribution and to cooperate in resolving questions concerning data, software, models, analysis, system evaluation, research integrity, authorship, or other aspects of the published work. |
Activities That Do Not Alone Qualify for Authorship
The following activities, when performed alone, are generally insufficient to justify authorship:
| • Providing research funding only | • Providing access to organizational databases, information systems, platforms, or company data only |
| • General academic or administrative supervision | • Holding an IT, managerial, executive, institutional, or organizational position |
| • Routine data entry, technical support, or clerical assistance | • Language editing, proofreading, or formatting only |
| • Providing servers, software licenses, devices, system access, or technical infrastructure only | • General encouragement or mentorship without scholarly contribution |
Individuals providing these forms of assistance may be recognized in the Acknowledgments section, subject to their permission where appropriate.
2. Author Contribution Statement – CRediT
Every accepted manuscript must include an Author Contribution Statement. Authors are encouraged to use the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) to identify each author's contribution transparently.
| Conceptualization Development of research ideas, information-system problems, research questions, hypotheses, digital-business models, or conceptual frameworks. |
Methodology Development or design of quantitative, qualitative, mixed, system-evaluation, design-science, survey, case-study, analytics, or other research methods. |
| Formal Analysis Statistical, business-intelligence, information-system, organizational, user-behavior, process, qualitative, or other analytical work. |
Investigation Conducting surveys, interviews, observations, usability studies, organizational case investigations, system assessments, or empirical data collection. |
| Data Curation Collecting, cleaning, coding, organizing, documenting, anonymizing, integrating, or maintaining research and information-system datasets. |
Software Programming, database development, analytics scripts, information-system prototyping, system implementation, or development of analytical tools. |
| Validation Verification of analytical results, models, system functions, calculations, measurements, usability outcomes, or research outputs. |
Visualization Preparation of research tables, figures, system diagrams, process models, dashboards, architectures, or data visualizations. |
| Writing – Original Draft Preparation of the initial scholarly manuscript. |
Writing – Review & Editing Critical intellectual review and substantive manuscript revision. |
| Resources Provision of essential datasets, system access, organizational records, platforms, instruments, software, or other resources combined with scholarly contribution. |
Supervision Intellectual oversight and scholarly guidance of the research process. |
| Project Administration Coordination and management of research activities. |
Funding Acquisition Acquisition of financial support for the research project. |
Note: Assignment of a CRediT role does not automatically qualify an individual for authorship. The individual must also satisfy the journal's authorship requirements and accept accountability.
3. Example of Author Contribution Statement
Example – Quantitative Information Systems / Digital Business Research
Author Contributions: A.B.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing – Original Draft. C.D.: Data Curation, Software, Validation, Visualization. E.F.: Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for their contributions.
Example – Information Systems / Organizational Case Study
Author Contributions: A.B.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft. C.D.: Investigation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis. E.F.: Validation, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
4. Author Order
Author order must be determined and agreed upon collectively by the author group before manuscript submission. The journal does not assign or determine author order.
The authorship list and order must be consistent across the submitted manuscript, OJS metadata, Author Contribution Statement, declarations, and final published article.
5. Corresponding Author
One author must be identified as the corresponding author and serve as the primary contact between the journal and all co-authors.
| ✓ Ensures all authors approve manuscript submission | ✓ Verifies author names, affiliations, email, and ORCID information |
| ✓ Coordinates responses to reviewers | ✓ Ensures all authors approve substantive revisions |
| ✓ Verifies funding and Conflict of Interest Statements | ✓ Coordinates the Data Availability Statement where applicable |
| ✓ Coordinates final proof approval | ✓ Responds to post-publication inquiries when necessary |
6. Unacceptable Authorship Practices
| ✕ Guest / Honorary Authorship Adding senior academics, executives, IT managers, institutional leaders, or respected individuals who did not make sufficient scholarly contributions. |
✕ Ghost Authorship Excluding individuals who made substantial contributions that qualify for authorship. |
| ✕ Gift / Reciprocal Authorship Exchanging or granting authorship without genuine scholarly contribution. |
✕ Purchased Authorship Buying, selling, or transferring authorship positions. |
| ✕ Coercive Authorship Requiring inclusion because of supervisory, technical, institutional, organizational, managerial, or professional authority. |
✕ Unauthorized Authorship Listing a person without their knowledge and approval. |
7. Changes to Authorship
Addition, removal, or rearrangement of authors after submission must be exceptional and supported by a clear explanation and written consent from all affected authors.
| BEFORE ACCEPTANCE May be considered with full written agreement |
AFTER ACCEPTANCE Exceptional and subject to editorial approval |
AFTER PUBLICATION May require a formal Correction Notice |
8. Authorship Disputes
The Editorial Team may request explanations and documentation when an authorship dispute arises. However, the journal does not normally adjudicate disputes concerning who should or should not qualify as an author. Unresolved disputes may be referred to the authors' institution, research-integrity office, or another appropriate authority. Editorial processing may be suspended until the dispute is resolved.
9. Artificial Intelligence and Authorship
Artificial intelligence tools, large language models, and generative AI systems must not be listed as authors or co-authors. AI cannot accept accountability, approve a manuscript, declare conflicts of interest, or take responsibility for research integrity. Relevant AI-assisted activities must instead be disclosed according to the journal's Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage Policy.
Authorship Checklist Before Submission
| ✓ Every listed author has made a genuine scholarly contribution | ✓ No eligible contributor has been omitted |
| ✓ Author order has been approved by all authors | ✓ All authors approved the submitted manuscript |
| ✓ Author Contribution Statement is complete | ✓ Corresponding author has been identified |
| ✓ OJS metadata matches the manuscript | ✓ All authors accept responsibility for the published work |
Authorship Principle
In Data : Journal of Information Systems and Management, authorship is based on substantive intellectual contribution and accountability. Academic rank, technical authority, managerial or institutional position, access to organizational databases or information systems, ownership of software or infrastructure, funding alone, supervisory status, or professional seniority does not by itself justify authorship.
