Fault Tree Analysis of Increased Pressure Drop in Hydrotreater Reactor

Authors

  • Zahru Wilda Pratiwi Polytechnic of Energy and Mineral Akamigas
  • Budi Sulistiyo Nugroho Polytechnic of Energy and Mineral Akamigas
  • Lian Safitri Polytechnic of Energy and Mineral Akamigas
  • Abdul Jalil Dumai Oil and Gas Company
  • Wanda Trihadi Dumai Oil and Gas Company
  • Ramli Dumai Oil and Gas Company

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61978/catalyx.v1i2.357

Keywords:

Hydrotreater, Pressure Drop, Reactor, Troubleshooting

Abstract

The treating stage in a Catalytic Reforming Unit (CRU) is a critical process to ensure the longevity and efficiency of the reforming catalyst. However, anomalies like sudden and significant increases in reactor pressure drop, as observed in this case, can disrupt operations and reduce the unit's overall performance. It is crucial to identify the root cause of the observed pressure drop anomaly using the Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) method to systematically investigate the issue from multiple perspectives, enabling the identification of both minor and significant contributing factors. The FTA results indicate that external debris introduced during a recent catalyst changeover (COC) activity is the most likely cause. This allegation is supported by the analysis of equipment operation data and feed condition records, which did not reveal any significant changes. Given the absence of internal factors, the external influence of the COC activity emerges as the primary explanation for the pressure drop increase. To prevent similar occurrences in the future, it is crucial to implement rigorous cleaning and inspection procedures during turn-around (TA) activities to minimize the risk of debris entering the system. Monitoring reactor pressure drop and feed quality can also help detect and address potential issues early on. By taking proactive measures, the reliability and efficiency of the treating stage can be maintained, ultimately improving the overall performance of the CRU.

References

Aznarez, A., Korili, S. A., & Gil, A. (2024). Progress and Recent Novelties in Naphtha Reforming Catalyst. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 1–27.

Centeno, G., Ancheyta, J., Alvarez, A., Marroquin, G., Alonso, F., & Castillo, A. (2012). Effect of different heavy feedstocks on the deactivation of a commercial: Vol. Fuel (pp. 73–79).

Chang, J.-C., & Chou, T.-C. (2011). Improve the operation cycle time of a naphtha hydrotreating unit by controlling the pressure drop. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 73–80.

Commision, U. N. (n.d.). Systems and Reliability Research. United States Government.

Cui, Q., Ma, X., Nakano, K., Nakabayashi, K., Miyawaki, J., Al-Mutairi, A., & Mochida, I. (2021). Effect of blending on hydrotreating reactivities of atmospheric residues : Synergistic effects. Fuel, 293(120429), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120429

Ferdiana, T., & Priadythama, I. (2016). Analisis Defect Menggunakan Metode Fault Tree Analysis (Fta) Berdasarkan Data Ground Finding Sheet (Gfs) Pt.Gmf Aeroasia. Universitas Sebelas Maret Proceeding Conference, 34–41.

Huda, H., Renanto, B., R., T., Fathoni, R., & Larasati, T. D. (2022). Prediction Analysis of Fouling Model on Heat Exchanger In The Crude Oil Refinery.

Ibrahim, H. A.-H., Safwat, A., & Hussany, N. (2005). Investigation of The Fouling Mechanism In The Heat Exchanger of A Hydrotreater. Engineering Journal of The University of Qatar, 18, 9–14.

Ishiyama, E. M., Kennedy, J., & Pugh, S. J. (2019). Modelling Fouling In Hydrodesulfurization Unit Heat Exchangers. Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning, 1–9.

Jackowski, L., Risse, P. J., & Smith, R. O. (2015). Impact of Non-Uniform Fouling on Operating Temperatures in Heat Exchanger Networks. Proceedings of International Conference on Heat Exchanger Fouling and Cleaning, 191–198.

Kartika, W. Y., Harsono, A., & Permata, G. (2016). Usulan Perbaikan Produk Cacat Menggunakan Metode Fault Mode And Effect Analysis Dan Fault Tree Analysis Pada Pt.Sygma Examedia Arkanleema. In Jurnal Online Institut Teknologi Nasional (pp. 345–357). Jurusan Teknik Industri Itenas.

Kohli, K., Prajapati, R., Maity, S. K., Sau, M., & Sharma, B. K. (2019). Deactivation of a hydrotreating catalyst during hydroprocessing of synthetic crude by metal bearing compounds. Fuel, 579–589.

Kolitcheff, S. (2021). Sulphur Spiking Agents for Hydroprocessing Units Activation. Digital Refining, al, 1–3.

Kooperen, A. V, Esteban, J., & Murphy, B. (2018). Hydroprocessing Rate Increase Using Shaped Charges. Digital Refining.

Korenev, V. V, Tomin, V. P., Zhdaneev, O. V, & Kapustin, V. M. (2022). Phase Equilibriums of Ammonium Chloride Systems as Model Hydrogenolysis Products of Organochlorine Compounds under Naphtha Hydrotreating Conditions. Petroleum Chemistry, 62(4), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544122020177

Novaes, L. R., Secchi, A. R., Salim, V. M., & Resende, N. S. (2021). Enhancement of hydrotreating process evaluation: correlation between feedstock properties, in-line monitoring and catalyst deactivation. Catalysis Today, 1–13.

Samimi, A., Zarinabadi, S., Kootenaei, A. H., Azimi, A., & Mirzaei, M. (2019). Optimization of The Naphtha Hydrotreating Unit (NHT. In in order to Increase Feed In The Refinery. Eurasian Chemical Communications (pp. 150–162).

Scotti, K. L., Voorhees, P. W., & Dunand, D. C. (2024). Lamellar structures in directionally solidified naphthalene suspensions. Journal of Materials Research, 39(15), 2228–2235. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-024-01381-x

Shaban, H. I., & Khan, A. R. (n.d.). Pressure-related operational problems and their remedies in hydrotreating reactors in petroleum refineries. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 14, 79–88.

Subagjo, & Ulfah, M. (2013). KINETIKA HIDRODESULFURISASI DIBENZOTHIOPHENE (HDS DBT) MENGGUNAKAN KATALIS NiMo/γ-Al2O3. Reaktor.

Topsoe, H. (2009). Pressure Drop Control. Lyngby.

Wallnofer-Ogris, E., Poimer, F., Koll, R., Macherhammer, M.-G., & Trattner, A. (2024). Main Degradation Mechanisms of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Stacks-Mechanisms, Influencing Factors, Consequences, and MItigation Strategies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

Wibowo, K., Sugiyarto, & Setiono. (2018). Analisa dan Evaluasi : Akar Penyebab dan Biaya Sisa Material Konstruksi Proyek Pembangunan Kantor Kelurahan di Kota Solo, Sekolah, dan Pasar Menggunakan Root Cause Analysis (RCA) dan Fault Tree Analysis (FTA. Matriks Teknik Sipil.

Yang, Y., Li, C., Yang, L., Zhu, H., Xie, Z., Falandysz, J., Weber, R., Qin, L., & Liu, G. (2024). Linking industrial emissions and dietary exposure to human burdens of polychlorinated naphthalenes. Science of the Total Environment, 951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175733

Yusuf, A. Z., John, Y. M., Aderemi, B. O., Patel, R., & Mujtaba, I. M. (2020). Effect of hydrogen partial pressure on catalytic reforming process of Naphtha. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Pratiwi, Z. W., Nugroho, B. S., Safitri, L., Jalil, A., Trihadi, W., & Ramli. (2024). Fault Tree Analysis of Increased Pressure Drop in Hydrotreater Reactor. Catalyx : Journal of Process Chemistry and Technology, 1(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.61978/catalyx.v1i2.357

Issue

Section

Articles